Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on March 28, 2008

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arn031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/816    most recent
arn031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stiver, K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Balshine, S.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stiver, K.A.
Right arrow Articles by Balshine, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder

K.A. Stivera, J.L. Fitzpatrickb, J.K. Desjardinsc, B.D. Neffd, J.S. Quinnb and S. Balshinee

a Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Osborn Memorial Laboratories, 165 Prospect Street, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8106, USA b Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1 c Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA d Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7 e Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1

Address correspondence to K.A. Stiver. E-mail: kelly.stiver{at}yale.edu.


   Abstract

Breeding with relatives can have severe fitness consequences, so avoiding these costs is often evolutionarily favored. There are a number of mechanisms that reduce the likelihood of mating with relatives, including avoiding relatives as mates (through sex-biased dispersal and mate choice) and delayed sexual maturity in the presence of relatives. Here, we examine these mechanisms in Neolamprologus pulcher, a group-living cichlid fish that exhibits male-biased dispersal. Despite sex-biased dispersal in this species, mean relatedness between social mates was not different from that expected if pairs had formed randomly, suggesting individuals neither actively avoid nor prefer pairing with relatives. Furthermore, gonadal investment of subordinates living in social groups was not correlated with their relatedness to the opposite-sex dominant breeder in the group, suggesting that sexual maturation does not depend on the presence or absence of a relative. Highly related social pairs showed higher rates of within-pair aggression and lower rates of nonaggressive social affiliation than less-related social pairs. Breeder investment and indicators of female breeder and group quality were not correlated with relatedness values between social mates. However, scraping rates (a potential quality indicator) were lower in males paired with more closely related females. We consider whether the apparent lack of inbreeding avoidance reflects an evolutionary history of limited breeding opportunities in N. pulcher or a facultative strategy of more-fit individuals and discuss the behavioral results in light of the suggested nonassortative mating with regard to relatedness.

Key words: cichlidae, inbreeding avoidance, Lake Tanganyika, mate choice, relatedness, reproductive suppression.

Received 14 November 2006; revised 15 February 2008; accepted 15 February 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.