Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on June 6, 2008

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arn059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/5/998    most recent
arn059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Royle, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Royle, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Metcalfe, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Context-dependent mate choice in relation to social composition in green swordtails Xiphophorus helleri

Nick J. Royle, Jan Lindström and Neil B. Metcalfe

Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Address correspondence to N.J. Royle, who is now at Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK. E-mail: n.j.royle{at}exeter.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Comparative evaluation mechanisms of mate choice in relation to social composition of potential mates have not been considered in nonhuman animals. Models of rational decision making suggest that when choice is based on absolute values, the addition of a third option should take choices from the original 2 options in proportion to their original shares and not result in an increase in the absolute preference for any of the 3 options in the set. However, studies of foraging behavior have shown that choice alternatives are often not irrelevant, specifically when preference is based on 2 or more dimensions (multiple cues) and when the third option is an asymmetrically dominated "decoy" (i.e., it has a lower value than both original options on one dimension but is only lower than one of the 2 original options on the other dimension). Asymmetrically dominated decoys are predicted to increase preference for the option that dominates it on both dimensions if mate choice is context dependent. We tested whether mate choice is dependent on or independent of social context in green swordtails, a species where females commonly use multiple cues in mate choice decisions. Addition of a third, decoy, male to the set of options resulted in females shifting preference away from the phenotype of male that each preferred in binary comparisons. Consequently, although mate choice was context dependent, the asymmetrically dominated decoy effect was not observed. Instead, females showed negative frequency-dependent preference for the rare-male phenotype, which may act to maintain genetic variation under sexual selection.

Key words: maintenance of variation, phenotypic plasticity, rational choice, sexual selection, social environment.

Received 4 December 2007; revised 24 April 2008; accepted 26 April 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. Heuschele, M. Mannerla, P. Gienapp, and U. Candolin
Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1223 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.