Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on July 22, 2008
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arn083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallizzi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Richner, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gallizzi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Richner, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Fleas, parental care, and transgenerational effects on tick load in the great tit

Katharina Gallizzi, Ophélie Alloitteau, Estelle Harrang and Heinz Richner

Evolutionary Ecology Group, Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland

Address correspondence to K. Gallizzi. E-mail: kat{at}gallizzi.ch.


  Abstract

In the presence of parasites, parents can increase the amount of resources allocated to parasite defense and thereby enhance their chances of survival and future reproduction or allocate more resources to current reproduction and thus increase the condition of their offspring. Here we test how a common ectoparasite affects parental behavior and the trade-off between parasite defense and reproduction in a wild bird population. To avoid confounding effects of the parasite infestation on the offspring and to test purely for the effect of the parasite on parents, we exposed parents to parasites before the young hatched only, that is, in the early phases of reproduction. Experimental great tit (Parus major) nests were infested with hen fleas (Ceratophyllus gallinae) until the start of incubation, whereas control nests were left parasite free. Parasite-induced maternal and genetic effects were then eliminated by replacing all clutches with the clutches of unexposed parents. All fleas were removed after clutch completion and hence nestlings grew up in practically flea-free nests. The experimental flea infestation before incubation did not change parental feeding rates but reduced the frequencies of brooding and nestling care. Tick prevalence increased and tarsus growth was reduced in nestlings reared by previously exposed parents. It suggests that a fraction of the costs for parents of the flea exposure before incubation is shifted to offspring via reduced parental care. The flea infestation before incubation did not affect parental body condition. However, flea-exposed parents had higher tick loads, which may impair parental health and survival.

Key words: Ceratophyllus gallinae, parasitism, parental investment, Parus major, trade-off.

Received 25 September 2007; revised 19 June 2008; accepted 20 June 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.