Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on August 11, 2009
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arp120
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Female túngara frogs vary in commitment to mate choice
a Section of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas, 1 University Station C0930, Austin, TX 78712, USA b Institute for Neuroscience, The University of Texas, 1 University Station C0930, Austin, TX 78712, USA c Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P.O. Box 0943-03092 Balboa Ancón, Republic of Panamá
Address correspondence to A.T. Baugh, 1 University Station, C0930 University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. E-mail: alex.baugh{at}gmail.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
Mate choice studies most often examine female preferences based on population responses, thus potentially overlooking individual differences in behavior. Moreover, such studies typically use invariant stimulus conditions to infer preferences. By using population responses and static stimulus presentations, it is difficult to thoroughly understand the complexity of the mate choice process, including variation present between individuals. Here, we investigated phonotactic mate choice behavior in female túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus) in response to temporally dynamic presentations of male advertisement calls. We tested females on repeated trials to examine individual differences and found considerable variation in the extent to which females update their mate choice decisions. Females in our study were bimodally distributed and thus broadly classified as either committed or uncommitted to an initial mate approach. We compared body condition measures of females differing behaviorally and determined that females with larger residual body masses were more committed to initial mate choices than less massive individuals, despite the fact that all females were in reproductive condition and field collected in amplexus. Our results suggest that anuran phonotaxis, once considered to be a highly stereotyped behavior, is more complex and variable than previously thought.
Key words: body condition, choosiness, dynamic behavior, individual differences, mate choice, phonotaxis.
Received 24 February 2009; revised 8 July 2009; accepted 19 July 2009.