Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on October 7, 2009

Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arp134
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/1282    most recent
arp134v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozak, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boughman, J. W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kozak, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boughman, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks

Genevieve M. Kozaka and Janette W. Boughmanb

a Department of Zoology b Center for Rapid Evolution, 430 Lincoln Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Address correspondence to G.M. Kozak, Department of Zoology, 426 Birge Hall, 430 Lincoln Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. E-mail: kozak{at}wisc.edu.


   Abstract

Sexual isolation between species often depends on preferences for conspecific mates. Recent models suggest that whether conspecific preference is determined genetically or learned will affect the process of speciation: Learned conspecific preferences might make speciation more likely. However, we understand little about how often and for which taxa, conspecific preferences are learned. Some species learn conspecific preference by imprinting on conspecifics; others learn from experience with heterospecifics. Even when one sex learns conspecific preference, the other may not. We tested whether conspecific mate preference is learned through social experience in males and females from 2 three-spined stickleback species that show strong sexual isolation (benthics and limnetics: Gasterosteus spp.). We reared fish with either mostly conspecifics or mostly heterospecifics and measured how this experience affected conspecific preference. In both sexes, experience enhanced conspecific mate preference but the sexes differed in the outcome. Females learned to prefer their own species through experience with conspecifics; males learned to discriminate through experience with heterospecifics. We also found species differences in the effect of social experience related to differences in sociality. Our results suggest that learned conspecific mate preference may have facilitated rapid speciation in the post Pleistocene radiation of sticklebacks.

Key words: learning, mate recognition, sexual isolation, speciation, sticklebacks.

Received 10 May 2009; revised 14 August 2009; accepted 17 August 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.