Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on October 21, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(6):1299-1306; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp139
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/1299    most recent
arp139v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leighton, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. L.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leighton, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How depth alters detection and capture of buried prey: exploitation of sea turtle eggs by mongooses

Patrick A. Leightona, Julia A. Horrocksb and Donald L. Kramera

a Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montreal H3A 1B1, Canada b Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Barbados, West Indies

Address correspondence to P.A. Leighton. E-mail: patrick.leighton{at}mail.mcgill.ca.


   Abstract

Predators are an important source of mortality for animals that lay their eggs in buried nests. We asked how depth alters the process of predation for buried prey. We outlined a general model of predation risk where depth may alter both prey detection and subsequent capture: deeper prey are detected less often because the strength of olfactory cues decreases with burial depth and, once detected, are further protected by the costs of digging. Using this framework, we examined how burial depth influenced egg predation for critically endangered hawksbill sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) by introduced mongooses (Herpestes javanicus) in Barbados. We tested the effects of nest depth on detection and subsequent predation using observational data on hawksbill nests over a 2-year period and an experiment with artificial nests. For both real and artificial nests, depth had little effect on nest detection by mongooses, but once detected, shallower nests were much more likely to be preyed on. Mongooses appear to use depth-invariant surface cues to detect nests but increase digging persistence in response to olfactory cues. We argue that excavation cost is an important but overlooked mechanism protecting deeply buried resources. For reptiles with buried nests, the relationship between depth and predation risk leads to important predictions about how changes to nesting habitat or the predator community will affect egg survival and offspring sex ratio. More generally, identifying the mechanisms by which burial depth protects prey is essential for understanding how resource burial strategies evolved and are maintained in predator–prey systems.

Key words: cache recovery, conservation, hatching success, Herpestes auropunctatus javanicus, invasive species, temperature-dependent sex determination.

Received 19 February 2009; revised 20 July 2009; accepted 25 August 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.