Skip Navigation



Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published online on November 11, 2009
Behavioral Ecology, doi:10.1093/beheco/arp153
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/33    most recent
arp153v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sabelis, M. W.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sabelis, M. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Context-dependent fitness effects of behavioral manipulation by a parasitoid

Arne Janssena, Amir H. Grosmana, Eduardo G. Cordeirob, Elaine F. de Britob, Juliana Oliveira Fonsecab, Felipe Colaresb, Angelo Pallinib, Eraldo R. Limab and Maurice W. Sabelisa

a Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Section Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands b Department of Animal Biology, Section Agricultural Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Address correspondence to A. Janssen. E-mail: arne.janssen{at}uva.nl.


  Abstract

Many true parasites and parasitoids modify the behavior of their host, and most of these changes are thought to benefit the parasites. However, field tests of this hypothesis are scarce. We previously showed that braconid parasitoids (Glyptapanteles sp.) induce their caterpillar host (Thyrinteina leucocerae) to behave as a bodyguard of the parasitoid's pupae; they stand bent over the pupae and violently lash out at predators approaching them, resulting in reduced predation of parasitoid pupae on guava trees in the field. In contrast, we show here that this behavioral manipulation does not result in increased parasitoid survival on eucalyptus trees, an introduced host plant species. Hence, the effects of behavioral manipulation of the host depend on the ecological context. We hypothesize that this is due to a different species composition of the community of predators and hyperparasitoids on the 2 host plant species. Our results show that fitness effects of behavioral manipulation should be evaluated in a setting that includes all relevant components of the natural food web.

Key words: defensive behavior, Glyptapanteles, host manipulation, parasitoid, Thyrinteina leucocerae, usurpation.

Arne Janssen and Amir H. Grosman contributed equally to this publication.

Received 3 July 2009; revised 29 September 2009; accepted 3 October 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.