Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbosa, A
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barbosa, A
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 1: 112-114
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology


Forum

Sexual selection and tail streamers in the barn swallow: appropriate tests of the function of size-dimorphic long tails

A Barbosa and AP Møller

Laboratoire d'Ecologie, CNRS URA 258, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bat. A, 7eme etage, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

Address correspondence to A. Barbosa, who is now at Departamento de Ecologia Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Jose Gutierrez Abascal, 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain.

Received 13 November 1997; accepted 8 May 1998.

In their recent forum paper, Thomas and Rowe (1997)Go question our tail manipulation experiments used to test sexual selection theory (Cuervo et al., 1996Go; de Lope and Møller, 1993Go; Møller, 1988Go, 1989Go, 1992bGo, 1994bGo; Møller and de Lope, 1994Go; Saino and Møller, 1996Go; Saino et al., 1997aGo, bGo). In summary, Thomas and Rowe claim that manipulations shortening and elongating the outermost tail feathers of barn swallows Hirundo rustica (see Møller, 1988Go, for a description of methods) are based on faulty logic and therefore cannot test the function of long tails. Several of their statements are unclear, incorrect, or need clarification for understanding the significance of tail manipulation experiments, and we will discuss these statements here. Thomas and Rowe repeat what has already been stated by Evans and Thomas (1997)Go. We have responded to that paper elsewhere (Møller et . . . [Full Text of this Article]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

REFERENCES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. J. Cuervo, A. P. Moller, and F. de Lope
Experimental manipulation of tail length in female barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) affects their future reproductive success
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 451 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. V. Rowe, M. R. Evans, and K. L. Buchanan
The function and evolution of the tail streamer in hirundines
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2001; 12(2): 157 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]