Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 2: 193-200
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Reproductive skew among males in a female-dominated mammalian society
a Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA b Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK c Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA d Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF1 3TL, UK e Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
Address correspondence to A. Engh. E-mail: enghanne{at}msu.edu .
Received 18 September 2000; revised 27 February 2001; accepted 18 May 2001.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purpose of this study was to document patterns of reproductive skew among male spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), a species in which many normal mammalian sex roles are reversed. We used paternity determined from 12 microsatellite markers together with demographic and behavioral data collected over 10 years from a free-living population to document relationships among reproductive success (RS), social rank, and dispersal status of male hyenas. Our data suggest that dispersal status and length of residence are the strongest determinants of RS. Natal males comprise over 20% of the adult male population, yet they sire only 3% of cubs, whereas immigrants sire 97%. This reproductive advantage to immigrants accrues despite the fact that immigrants are socially subordinate to all adult natal males, and it provides a compelling ultimate explanation for primary dispersal in this species. High-ranking immigrants do not monopolize reproduction, and tenure accounts for more of the variance in male reproductive success than does social rank. Immigrant male hyenas rarely fight among themselves, so combat between rivals may be a relatively ineffectual mode of sexual selection in this species. Instead, female choice of mates appears to play an important role in determining patterns of paternity in Crocuta. Our data support a "limited control" model of reproductive skew in this species, in which female choice may play a more important role in limiting control by dominant males than do power struggles among males.
Key words: Crocuta, dispersal, hyena, mate choice, rank, reproductive skew, reproductive success, tenure.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mammalian societies vary in the extent to which reproduction is skewed toward one or a few socially dominant individuals. In societies organized by hierarchical rank relationships, reproductive success (RS) among males is often positively correlated with social rank, which in turn is largely determined by fighting ability. Rank-related reproductive skew among males has now been documented with behavioral and molecular data in many group-living mammals (ungulates; Clutton-Brock, 1988
Reproductive success among female Crocuta is strongly correlated
with social rank (Frank et al.,
1995
; Holekamp et al.,
1996
), but little is known about RS in males. Limited observations
of wild spotted hyenas have suggested that only the highest-ranking immigrant
male fathers offspring in this species
(Frank, 1986
;
Mills, 1990
). However,
copulations are rarely observed, so the extent of reproductive skew among male
hyenas remains unknown. Here we combine field observations with the use of
genetic markers as indicators of paternity to examine patterns of reproductive
skew among male hyenas, as well as to test predictions of competing models
suggesting alternative relationships between male rank and RS in this species.
The first, null, hypothesis suggests that males of all social ranks should be
equally likely to father cubs. Second, a dominance-based priority of access
model predicts that the number of offspring sired by a given male should
depend on both his social rank and the number of females simultaneously in
estrus. In a less restrictive test of the priority of access model, we inquire
whether the highest-ranking male observed with a fertile female is the male
most likely to sire her cubs.
Spotted hyenas are gregarious carnivores that live in social groups, called
clans, composed of multiple matrilines of adult females and their offspring,
as well as one or more adult immigrant males. An individual's social rank
determines its priority of access to food
(Frank, 1986
;
Kruuk, 1972
;
Tilson and Hamilton, 1984
).
Both male and female cubs "inherit" their mothers' ranks; that is,
they attain ranks in the dominance hierarchy immediately below those of their
mothers (Engh et al., 2000
;
Holekamp and Smale, 1993
;
Smale et al., 1993
). Females
are usually philopatric, whereas males invariably emigrate from their natal
clans at 25 to 62 months of age (Frank,
1986
; Henschel and Skinner,
1987
; Holekamp and Smale,
1998
; Smale et al.
1997
). Adult natal males dominate adult females ranked lower than
their own mothers in the clan's dominance hierarchy for as long as they remain
in their natal clans. However, when males disperse, they behave submissively
to all new hyenas encountered outside the natal area
(Holekamp and Smale, 1998
;
Smale et al., 1993
,
1997
). Thus, by joining a new
clan, each immigrant assumes the lowest rank in that clan's dominance
hierarchy, and his status only improves through attrition by death or
secondary dispersal of the immigrant males that arrived before him
(Smale et al., 1997
).
Because males typically remain in their natal clans for several months or
years after puberty, there are two classes of reproductively mature males in
every Crocuta clan: adult natal males born in the clan and adult
immigrant males born elsewhere. Since all natal animals outrank all
immigrants, a male's rank-determined priority of access to food is inevitably
worse after he emigrates from his natal clan than before dispersal
(Holekamp and Smale, 1998
;
Smale et al., 1993
,
1997
). Nevertheless, all males
eventually disperse. If dispersal is adaptive, then the fitness benefits of
dispersing must exceed the costs associated with reduced access to food. The
ultimate cause of male dispersal in this species remains unknown. The most
plausible hypothesis to account for a behavior pattern with such dire
nutritional consequences is that males may only be able to mate outside of
their natal clans. Therefore, in addition to using our genetic data to examine
patterns of reproductive skew among males, we also use them to test this
hypothesis.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study population
We conducted this study in the Talek area (1°40' S, 35°50' E) of the Masai Mara National Reserve. This is an area of open grasslands grazed year round by large concentrations of several ungulate species. The subject population was one large Crocuta clan inhabiting a home range of approximately 65 km2. We monitored Talek hyenas from June 1988 to January 1999.
We identified all hyenas in the Talek clan by their unique spot patterns,
and we determined their sex from the dimorphic glans morphology of the erect
phallus (Frank et al., 1990
).
All hyenas initially appearing in the Talek home range as adults were
photographed when first sighted, and the day an individual was first seen in
Talek was considered its date of arrival. Immigrant males remaining in Talek
for at least 6 months were called "resident immigrant males,"
whereas males remaining for shorter periods were called
"transients." The duration of residence of any given immigrant
male in the Talek clan was called his "tenure" in the clan.
Between 1988 and 1999, the Talek study clan varied in size from 50 to 78
individuals, and usually contained 20 to 22 adult females (range: 16-28) and
their juvenile offspring. On average during the study period, 13.8 ±
2.1 resident immigrant males and 4.4 ± 0.6 adult natal males were
present in the clan. In addition, two or three transient immigrant males
appeared in the clan's territory each month and remained for shorter periods,
usually only a few days (Smale et al.,
1997
).
Mother-offspring relationships were established on the basis of regular
nursing associations, which last up to 21 months in this species
(Hofer and East, 1995
;
Holekamp et al., 1996
). We
assigned birth dates to litters by estimating cub ages when they were first
observed above ground at natal or communal dens. Cub ages could be estimated
to ± 7 days based on pelage, size, and other aspects of cub appearance
and behavior (Holekamp et al.,
1996
). Male Crocuta have viable sperm in their testes by
24 months of age (Matthews,
1939
), and we therefore considered natal males older than 24
months to be adults. We estimated the ages of immigrant males based on the
degree of tooth wear (Van Horn R, unpublished data).
We conducted behavioral observations from vehicles between 0530 and 0900 h
and between 1700 and 2000 h. During the study period, we observed hyenas for
over 30,000 person hours during 35,040 observation sessions. We defined an
observation session to include all of the time spent watching hyenas located
within 200 m of one another. We identified all individual hyenas present in
these sessions, and we excluded from analyses any sessions in which one or
more unidentified hyenas were present. Throughout the study period, all
mounting behavior and complete copulatory sequences (those involving
intromission and ejaculation) were recorded during critical incident sampling
(the "all occurrence sampling" of
Altmann, 1974
).
We determined social ranks of individuals based on outcomes of several
thousand dyadic agonistic interactions during which one individual exhibited
appeasement behavior to the other, as described previously
(Holekamp and Smale, 1990
;
Smale et al., 1993
). All
resident immigrants present in the clan concurrently were organized into a
matrix based on direction, not number, of interactions
(Martin and Bateson, 1988
).
The resident immigrant matrix was composed of 997 dyadic agonistic
interactions in which 38 interactions (3.8%) were inconsistent with assigned
ranks. By convention, the highest-ranking immigrant, who was able to win
against all other immigrants in agonistic interactions, was called the
"alpha male," and was assigned a rank of 1. The period during
which any male held alpha status was referred to as his "reign."
Due to male attrition and the arrival of new immigrants, not all resident
males present in Talek during a given reign were necessarily there
concurrently. For tenure-based analyses, only resident immigrant males whose
tenure began after the start of the study period were used.
Sample collection and paternity analysis
Most DNA samples originated from venous blood collected while hyenas were
anaesthetized with Telazol (2.5 mg/kg) delivered from a CO2-powered
darting rifle (Telinject, Saugus, California, USA). Most cubs were darted
between 8 and 12 months of age, and immigrant males were darted as early in
their tenure as possible. We collected body and tooth measurements from all
immobilized hyenas. We used a Puregene (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, USA) kit to extract DNA from blood shortly after collection, and
then stored the DNA in liquid nitrogen. We also collected tissue samples from
dead hyenas whenever we found them. DNA was isolated from tissues using either
standard phenol-chloroform extraction techniques or Qiagen kits (Qiagen,
Bothel, Washington, USA). We genotyped sampled individuals using eleven
autosomal microsatellite loci and one X-linked microsatellite locus (CCrAndr3)
as described elsewhere (Funk SM and Engh AL, unpublished data;
Libants et al., 2000
). Across
the 12 loci, on average, there were 5.1 alleles/locus (range: 2-8), and the
expected heterozygosity was 0.62. We estimated typing error (1.0%) from the
frequency of mother-cub mismatches. Overall exclusion probability was.998.
All resident immigrant, transient, and unrelated adult natal males present
in the clan at conception of a particular litter were considered as potential
fathers. Males were considered unrelated to particular females when their
maternal coefficients of relatedness, calculated from genealogies, were less
than 0.125. We employed a maximum likelihood-based approach
(Meagher, 1986
;
Thompson, 1975
) to assign
paternity to cubs with known, genotyped mothers using the program CERVUS
(Marshall et al., 1998
). We
used the following parameters in CERVUS: 85 candidate males (total number of
resident immigrant males + adult natal males + sampled transient males), 92%
of candidate males sampled, 91% of loci typed, and a 1% error rate. A male was
considered the father of a cub when CERVUS assigned him at 95% confidence.
Confidence levels were derived based on population allele frequencies at each
locus and represent levels of tolerance of false paternity that would be
assigned to males whose genotypes are consistent with those of cubs by chance
alone (see Marshall et al.,
1998
for details).
Modeling the relationship between male rank and male RS
We used results of our paternity analysis to examine predictions of two
mutually exclusive models, each suggesting a different relationship between
male rank and RS in Crocuta. The first hypothesis suggests that males
of all social ranks should be equally likely to father cubs. A second,
dominance-based priority of access model predicts that the number of offspring
fathered by a given male should depend on both his dominance status and the
number of females simultaneously in estrus
(Altmann et al., 1996
). Since a
male can monopolize only one fertile female at a time, the priority of access
model predicts that the alpha immigrant male will father all offspring
conceived when only one female in the group is in estrus, the alpha and beta
males will equally share paternity of cubs sired when two females are
simultaneously in estrus, and so on
(Altmann et al., 1996
).
Conception dates of hyena litters were calculated by subtracting the gestation
period of 110 days (Schneider,
1926
) from birthdates. The 2-week interval surrounding each
conception date was considered the fertile period during each breeding cycle
of each female hyena. In addition, we determined whether the highest-ranking
male present with a particular female during her fertile period was the male
most likely to father her cubs. To do so, we recorded the identities and
social ranks of all males found with that female during her fertile period.
Finally, to evaluate whether access to females was affected by male rank, we
calculated the percent of all adult Talek females that were encountered by
each immigrant male per observation session during 26 2-week intervals in 1994
as ([number of females encountered/ number of females present in the clan]/
number of sessions each male observed) *100.
Statistical analysis
Correlations between behavioral variables or measures of male RS and male
social rank were evaluated with Spearman correlation coefficients using SYSTAT
software. Other correlations were assessed using Pearson's R.
Probabilities of fathering cubs were compared for adult natal and adult
immigrant males using chi-square tests, as were observed and predicted values
obtained in testing the priority of access model. We compared reproductive
rates of age-matched immigrant and adult natal males with a Mann-Whitney
U test, and we used analysis of variance to evaluate differences in
measures of RS among males based on total tenure and highest rank achieved.
For analyses in which the dependent variable was a proportion (percent of
assigned cubs sired), we used an arcsine-square root transformation to
normalize the distribution of the data. Differences between groups were
considered significant when p <.05.
Please note that the data presented in Figures1 and 6 represents the same male at more than one rank or in more than 1 year. Almost all resident immigrant males were present for several years (range = 0.67-8.08) and occupied several ranks (range = 1-12) during their tenure in the clan, and we believe that using data from these same individuals over multiple years and ranks presents a more complete view of long term male reproductive success than simply presenting a "snapshot" of RS at only one point in a male's life. However, to avoid pseudoreplication, we include additional analyses in which individual males are represented only once or repeated measures where each male is represented over the same time/rank span.
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Paternity assignment and multiple paternity
DNA samples from 199 hyenas were collected between December 1990 and August 2000, including 85 natal females, 74 natal males, 5 transient males, and 35 resident immigrant males. Between December 1990 and January 1999, each of eight different resident immigrant males held alpha status in Talek for 1 to 34 months. DNA was sampled from at least 92% of all resident immigrant and adult natal males during this period, and paternity was verified in 75 (68.2%) out of 110 cubs sampled (Table 1). Twelve of the 75 cubs assigned fathers had mismatches with their putative fathers at one locus. The rate of cub-father mismatches is 0.97%, which is similar to the 1.0% mismatch rate for known mother-cub pairs. No male assigned paternity by CERVUS at 95% confidence had more than a single mismatch with his putative offspring.
|
Seventeen cubs for which paternity could be assigned were from singleton litters, and 58 were from 31 twin litters. Of 14 twin litters in which sires could be assigned for both littermates, three (21.4%) were fathered by two different males, and 11 (78.6%) were fathered by single males. In five (38.5%) of an additional 13 twin litters in which only one cub could be assigned a father, the assigned father could be excluded from siring the other cub at two or more loci. Because litter size varied from one to two cubs and the proportion of cubs in a litter sired by a single male differed in this population, all analyses below use individual cubs rather than litters as the units of analysis unless otherwise indicated.
Male dispersal status
Of the 75 cubs for which paternity could be assigned, 73 (97.3%) were
fathered by immigrant males, and two (2.7%) by adult natal males
(Table 1). No cubs were found
to be sired by transient immigrant males; however, only five transients were
sampled. Of 31 sampled cubs conceived during the 24 months when all five natal
and 22 resident immigrant males were sampled (August 1995-September 1997), 22
(71.0%) were fathered by immigrants and none were sired by natal males.
Twenty-nine of these 31 cubs (93.5%) could be assigned to Talek males using
CERVUS at 80% or greater confidence, and the remaining two cubs (6.5%) could
not be assigned with confidence to any Talek males. Uncertain paternity of
these two cubs could be due to their having been sired either by unsampled
transient males in the Talek area or by males encountered during female
excursions into surrounding territories. We observed several transient males
in the Talek home range each month (Smale
et al., 1997
), and females occasionally made forays into
surrounding territories. On average, 94.4 ± 1.9% of all locations at
which adult Talek females are found fall within the clan's territorial
boundaries (Boydston et al.,
2001
).
Mean annual RS among immigrant males was 0.66 ± 0.12 cubs/year (range, 0-2.33; N = 35), and was thus over 10 times higher than mean annual RS among adult natal males (mean = 0.06 ± 0.06 cub/year; range, 0-2.15; N = 35). Natal males were less likely to father any cubs at all than were immigrants (1 of 35 sampled adult natal males versus 22 of 35 immigrants; X12 = 28.6, p <.001). When we restricted our analysis of RS to immigrant males estimated to be less than 3 years old, the mean annual RS of immigrant males (mean = 0.33 ± 0.19 cubs/year; N = 12) was still higher than that of adult natal males (Mann-Whitney U1 = 255.0; p =.02). It is therefore unlikely that adult natal males are simply too young to reproduce. These data indicate that adult natal males generally experience very low RS compared to that of males managing to join a new clan after emigration from their natal groups.
Male rank and the priority of access model
Most immigrant males that eventually attained alpha status sired at least
one cub (range, 0-13 cubs; N = 8 males), but these males sired an
average of 87.5 ± 11.0% of their sampled offspring before they attained
alpha status. Clearly, alpha males were not monopolizing reproductive
opportunities (Table 1 and
Figure 1).
Social rank of resident immigrant males was positively correlated with their annual reproductive rate (Figure 1; Rs = -0.31; p =.041; N = 35 males). In a conservative analysis in which each male's rate of yearly cub production was calculated for a single, randomly assigned rank, we still found a positive correlation between male rank and RS (Rs = -0.30; p <.042; N = 35). These data allowed us to rule out the null hypothesis, which suggested that males of all ranks were equally likely to sire cubs. However, although the correlation we found between male rank and RS was significant, rank failed to account for even half of the variance in male RS, and the pattern of RS observed among Talek males failed to match that predicted by the priority of access model (Figure 2; X12 = 170.2, p <.001).
|
One potential problem with the application of the priority of access model to the fission-fusion society of the spotted hyena is that it assumes that males obtain perfect information about the whereabouts and reproductive status of breeding females. In fact, however, higher-ranking immigrants typically encountered a larger proportion of clan females per time interval than did lower-ranking immigrants (Figure 3; Rs = -0.66; p <.005; N = 20 males). Thus high-ranking immigrant males may be more efficient than their lower-ranking peers with respect to moving around the Talek territory or meeting up with multiple females. On average, males are only observed with 22.7% of females during each two-week period, suggesting that even high-ranking males may not have accurate information about the reproductive status of most clan females.
|
We next assessed the possibility that the sire of a female's litter is
likely to be the highest-ranking male meeting up with her during her fertile
period. We recorded the behavior of 29 females during 53 fertile periods in
which we assigned paternity to the litter conceived. On average, each fertile
female was observed for 260 ± 32 min in 11.4 ± 1.4 sessions. In
10 (18.9%) of the 53 fertile periods, the highest-ranking male observed with
the mother fathered at least half of the litter she produced 110 days later.
However, in 43 (81.1%) of these fertile periods, the highest-ranking male
observed with the female failed to sire any of her cubs. In fact, the
highest-ranking male observed with a fertile female was no more likely to sire
her cubs than any other immigrant male observed with her
(
12 = 1.37, p <.25, N = 64
cubs). On average during these fertile periods, females were found with 2.51
± 0.33 immigrants that were higher-ranking, and with 1.17 ± 0.19
unrelated adult natal males that were higher-ranking, than the sires of the
cubs conceived.
Copulatory behavior
We watched Talek hyenas for over 30,000 person hours during the study
period, but we observed only 39 mounting bouts and 20 bouts of complete
copulation (Figure 4). Each
bout typically included several mounts or complete copulations over a period
of hours. Five of 39 mounting bouts (12.8%) were performed by five different
adult natal males, and the remainder (87.2%) by 16 different immigrant males.
Adult natal males were never observed to achieve intromission, so all complete
copulations involved immigrants. Neither the number of mounting bouts
performed (Rs = -0.38; ns) nor the number of copulations achieved
(Rs = -.14; ns) was significantly correlated with immigrant male
social rank (N = 25 ranks), although this may have been due to the
small sample size of observed copulations. Alpha males achieved only 1 (5.0%)
of 20 complete copulations observed, and over 50% of all observed copulations
were achieved by animals ranked fourth through sixth in the immigrant male
hierarchy. No observed mounts or copulations involved transient males. The
overall trends of the behavioral data are similar to those observed in the
molecular paternity data. During a single estrous period, Talek females were
mounted by one to three different males (mean = 1.18 ± 0.08
males/estrous; N = 33 estrous periods). On average, each resident
immigrant male seen copulating mated with 1.42 ± 0.29 different
females. Thus mating appears to be highly promiscuous in both sexes.
|
Male rank and tenure
Immigrant male social rank in this species is highly correlated with
arrival order in the new clan (Pusey and
Packer, 1997
; Smale et al.,
1997
), so we next attempted to evaluate effects of immigrant male
tenure on RS. Among immigrant males who fathered any cubs, the mean period
between arriving in Talek and fathering a first cub was 20.8 ± 4.0
months (range, 0-55.2; N = 24 males), and long term male RS was
positively correlated with total time in the clan
(Figure 5; Rp =
0.82; p <.001; N = 24 males). One possible explanation
for this pattern is that males failing to reproduce soon after immigrating to
Talek engaged in secondary dispersal whereas successful males remained there
longer. However, this interpretation seems unlikely since immigrant males that
remained in Talek for several years were no more likely to have fathered cubs
during their first two years in Talek than were immigrants that disappeared
during their third year (2 of 6 versus 3 of 8 males,
12 with Yates's correction for small samples =
0.18; ns).
|
To disentangle the effects of rank and tenure in Talek on immigrant male RS, we simultaneously regressed the transformed dependent variable of percent of assigned cubs sired against total male tenure in the clan and highest social rank achieved during that tenure. Whereas both of these independent variables were significantly related to percent cubs sired by immigrant males, total tenure (p =.02) explained 60% of the total variance in this model whereas highest rank achieved (p =.45) explained only 18% of the variance (N = 24 males). The rate at which males produce cubs is low early in their tenure, then it increases after they have resided in the clan for several years (Figure 6; F7,128 = 2.457; p =.021). Repeated measures analysis of the three males who were present in the clan for a minimum of 5 years and eight social ranks detected a similar relationship between tenure and reproductive rate despite the small sample size and low power (F4,8 = 4.25; p =.04), but found no relationship between rank and reproductive rate (F7,14 = 0.58; ns).
Tenure was not significantly correlated with any measure of male body size, including body length (Rp = 0.277, ns; N = 35), skull length (Rp = 0.289, ns; N = 35) and shoulder height (Rp = 0.201; ns; N = 35). Thus immigrant males who had been present in the Talek clan for an extended period were not any larger than those males that had arrived more recently, and the observed relationship between male tenure and RS did not appear to be due to an effect of increasing body size.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The spotted hyenas in our Kenyan study clan exhibit a promiscuous mating system. Approximately one fifth of all twin litters are sired by multiple males. Genetic paternity tests have revealed that multiple paternity similarly occurs in many other carnivore species (Eurasian badgers; Da Silva et al., 1994
Among resident immigrant males, social rank is correlated with male RS, but
tenure is a far better predictor of RS than is rank. Our data do not conform
to predictions of a dominance-based priority of access model
(Altmann et al., 1996
), and the
data documenting associations between males and fertile females are
inconsistent with the hypothesis that the highest-ranking male present with a
female during her fertile period is most likely to sire some or all of her
offspring. Our results thus stand in striking contrast to those obtained from
other mammalian carnivores in which male RS increases with social dominance
and ability to win fights with other males (e.g., sea lions;
Campagna and LeBoeuf, 1988
;
Cape hunting dogs; Creel et al.,
1997
; raccoons; Gehrt and
Fritzell, 1999
; meerkats;
Griffin, 1999
; kinkajous;
Kays et al., 2000
; wolves;
Packard et al., 1985
; polar
bears; Ramsay and Stirling,
1986
). The social lives of spotted hyenas are similar in many
respects to those of most cercopithecine primates
(Frank, 1986
;
Holekamp et al., 1999
).
However, most studies of paternity in wild cercopithecine primates generally
find that, as in most other mammals
(Ellis, 1995
), male social
rank is highly correlated with reproductive success
(Altmann et al., 1996
;
de Ruiter et al., 1994
;
Melnick, 1987
).
Several different hypotheses might explain why high-ranking male hyenas are
not monopolizing reproduction. Social rank of male hyenas is not correlated
with body size, so unlike high-ranking males in other polygynous mammals,
high-ranking male hyenas cannot necessarily physically exclude lower-ranking
males from mating. In fact, fighting among male hyenas is rare, and when it
does occur, it is usually restricted to low-level threats
(Frank, 1986
;
Kruuk, 1972
). The only stage
in the life history of this species in which males confront intense aggression
from other males is during the process of immigrating into a new clan, and
male-male fighting is rare even under these circumstances. Whereas all males
disperse, few successfully immigrate. From 1988 to 1997, although 49% of 291
prospective immigrants remained in Talek for more than 1 month, only 15%
remained there for longer than 2 years
(Smale et al., 1997
).
Aggression directed toward potential immigrants might permit only the best
fighters to gain entry into the clan, and successful immigrants might then be
too well matched to risk escalated fights. This scenario, however, seems
unlikely, since most new immigrants behave extremely submissively to both male
and female residents when trying to enter a new clan
(Smale et al., 1997
), and
because substantial variation in body size, and thus presumably in fighting
ability, exists within the immigrant male hierarchy.
High-ranking male hyenas may not be able to monopolize reproduction because
they cannot adequately keep track of female location and reproductive state.
Hyenas live in fission-fusion societies in which subgroup composition changes
from day to day, or even hour to hour
(East et al., 1993
;
Holekamp et al., 1997
), so
tracking multiple reproductive females might be difficult. Our analysis of
male rank in relation to the proportion of clan females encountered shows that
high-ranking males have a slight advantage over low-ranking males with respect
to encountering females, so high-ranking males may fare better in scramble
competition over mates. However, unlike lions, hyenas do not appear to respect
"ownership" of estrous females by the first male to mate
(Packer and Pusey, 1983
).
Indeed, we have observed two males alternately mounting a single estrous
female (Szykman, 2001
).
Furthermore, our behavioral data show that even when high-ranking males are
observed with fertile females, they are unlikely to father cubs. This is
unlikely to be the result of sperm depletion
(Preston et al., 2001
), since
estru is asynchronous in female hyenas, and 60% of fertile periods do not
overlap at all with those of any other females
(Szykman et al., 2001
). Thus,
neither difficulty in finding receptive females nor inability to fertilize
them can satisfactorily explain the patterns of reproductive skew observed
among male hyenas.
Prohibitive energetic costs might keep high-ranking males from monopolizing
reproduction. We frequently observed males following particular females for
days or even weeks (Szykman,
2001
). These "consorting" males may undergo serious
energetic stress unless they periodically leave the females to feed. Female
hyenas always have higher priority of access to food than immigrant males, so
it may be difficult for a male to guard a female continuously for extended
periods of time without starving. Male hyenas with the highest priority of
access to food at ungulate kills may be best able to fortify themselves for
extended attendance of females, and thereby obtain an advantage during
male-male scramble competition (see also
Bercovitch, 1997
; Bercovitch
and Nurnberg, 1996
,
1997
). If this were true,
however, we would expect to see a stronger relationship between male rank and
RS than between tenure and RS.
Finally, high-ranking males may not be able to monopolize reproduction if females choose not to mate with them. Female hyenas are dominant to immigrant males, and their unusual genital morphology makes forced copulation impossible. Several lines of evidence suggest that female choice has important effects on patterns of paternity in Crocuta. First, despite the fact that adult natal males can always win in fights with immigrants, and although they express sexual interest in Talek females, natal males rarely father any cubs. These patterns suggest that females strongly prefer immigrants over natal males, perhaps to avoid the deleterious consequences of inbreeding. Second, patterns of association between Talek females and immigrant males show that the highest-ranking male present with a female during her fertile period fathers her cubs in only 19% of cases, and mid-ranking males do better than expected based on their ability to win in either agonistic interactions or scramble competition with other males. Third, RS varies substantially within most male rank positions, and also within any given year of immigrant tenure in the Talek clan, suggesting that some males present during each alpha reign are more attractive to females than others. These data suggest that female choice of mates may limit control of reproduction by high-ranking male hyenas.
Optimal skew models (e.g., Reeve et
al., 1998
; Vehrencamp,
1983
) suggest that dominant individuals have full control of
subordinate reproduction and allow subordinates to breed only when necessary
to entice them to remain in the group and cooperate. Although optimal skew
models may be applicable to some animal societies, they fail to account for
observed partitioning of reproduction within many vertebrate social groups,
including those of other mammalian carnivores (e.g.,
Clutton-Brock et al., 2001
).
Instead, these recent empirical data are more consistent with predictions of
limited control models of reproductive skew which predict that subordinates
will breed when dominants' capacity for control of reproduction is reduced.
Similarly, the data presented here for male spotted hyenas are more compatible
with limited control than optimal skew models, but control in this species is
clearly limited by variables other than those associated with male-male
fighting. Indeed, as suggested recently by Koenig and Haydock
(2001
), interactions between
males and females, including incest avoidance and mate choice, may limit
dominant's control of reproduction.
In contrast to what occurs in most polygynous mammals, male-male contest competition appears to have little influence over male reproductive success in the spotted hyena. The highest-ranking (natal) males have very low reproductive success, and high-ranking immigrant males cannot prevent lower-ranking males from copulating with females. Rather than favoring big, fierce males, sexual selection in hyenas has apparently favored males who compete by successfully immigrating, persisting in their new clans for several years, and overcoming the energetic handicaps imposed by low social rank.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the Office of the President of Kenya for permission to conduct this research. We thank the Kenya Wildlife Service, the National Museums of Kenya, the Narok County Council, and the Senior Warden of the Masai Mara National Reserve for their cooperation. We thank P. Arctander, T. Coote, T. Burland, T. Friedman, S. Jenks, P. Kat, D. Wasao, and R.K. Wayne for their efforts in the laboratory, and N.E. Berry, E.E. Boydston, S.M. Cooper, M. Durham, J. Friedman, P. Garrett, I. Graham, T.H. Harty, C.I. Katona, K. Nutt, G. Ording, K. Weibel, and B. White for their assistance in the field. We thank T. Getty, A. Tessier, and C. Packer for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article. This work was supported by grants from the Institute of Zoology to S.M.F. and M.B., and by National Science Foundation grants IBN9309805, IBN9630667, and IBN9906445 to K.E.H. and L.S.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altmann J, 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227-267.[Medline]
Altmann J, Alberts SC, Haines SA, Dubach J, Muruthi P, Coote T,
Gefen E, Cheesman DJ, Mututua RS, Saiyalel SN, Wayne RK, Lacy RC, Bruford MW,
1996. Behavior predicts genetic structure in a wild primate
group. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:
5797-5801.
Bercovitch FB, 1997. Reproductive strategies of rhesus macaques. Primates 38: 247-263.
Bercovitch FB, Nurnberg P, 1996. Socioendocrine and morphological correlates of paternity in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Repro Fert 107: 59-68.
Bercovitch FB, Nurnberg P, 1997. Genetic determination of paternity and variation in male reproductive success in two populations of rhesus macaques. Electrophoresis 18: 1701-1705.[ISI][Medline]
Boydston EE, Morelli TL, Holekamp KE, 2001. Sex differences in territorial behavior exhibited by the spotted hyena (Hyaenidae, Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 107: 369-385.
Campagna C, Le Boeuf BJ, 1988. Reproductive behaviour of southern sea lions. Behaviour 104: 233-260.
Chepko-Sade BD, Halpin ZT, 1987. Mammalian dispersal patterns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clutton-Brock TH (ed), 1988. Reproductive success. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Russell AF, O'Riain MJ, Gaynor D,
Kansky R, Griffin R, Manser M, Sharpe L, McIlrath GM, Small T, Moss A,
Montfort S, 2001. Cooperation, control, and concession in meerkat
groups. Science 291:
478-481.
Creel S, Creel NM, Mills MGL, Montfort SL, 1997. Rank and reproduction in cooperatively breeding African wild dogs: behavioral and endocrine correlates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8: 298-306.
Da Silva J, Macdonald DW, Evans PGH, 1994. Net costs
of group living in a solitary forager, the Eurasian badger. Behav
Ecol 5:
151-158.
Darwin C, 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
De Ruiter JR, Van Hooff JARAM, Scheffrahn W, 1994. Social and genetic aspects of paternity in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behaviour 129: 203-224.
Dobson SF, 1982. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav 30: 361-369.
East ML, Hofer H, Wickler W, 1993. The erect `penis' as a flag of submission in a female-dominated society: greetings in Serengeti spotted hyaenas. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 355-370.
Ellis L, 1995. Dominance and reproductive success among non-human animals: a cross-species comparison. Ethol Sociobiol 16: 257-333.
Engh AL, Esch K, Smale L, Holekamp KE, 2000. Mechanisms of maternal rank `inheritance' in the spotted hyaena. Anim Behav 60: 323-332.[ISI][Medline]
Frank LG, 1986. Social organisation of the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) II. Dominance and reproduction. Anim Behav 35: 1510-1527.
Frank LG, Glickman SE, Powch I, 1990. Sexual dimorphism in the spotted hyena. J Zool London 221: 308-313.
Frank LG, Holekamp KE, Smale L, 1995. Dominance, demography, and reproductive success of female spotted hyenas. In: Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem (Sinclair ARE, Arcese P, eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 364-384.
Gehrt SD, Fritzell EK, 1999. Behavioural aspects of the raccoon mating system: determinants of consortship success. Anim Behav 57: 593-601.[ISI][Medline]
Girman DJ, Mills MGL, Geffen E, Wayne RK, 1997. A molecular genetic analysis of social structure, dispersal, and interpack relationships of the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40: 187-198.
Gottelli D, Sillero-Zubiri C, Applebaum GD, Roy MS, Girman DJ, Garcia-Moreno J, Ostrander EA, Wayne RK, 1994. Molecular genetics of the most endangered canidthe Ethiopian wolf Canis simensis. Molec Ecol 3: 301-312.[Medline]
Greenwood PJ, 1980. Mating systems, philopatry, and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28: 1140-1162.
Griffin AS, 1999. A genetic analysis of cooperative breeding in meerkats (PhD dissertation). Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh.
Henschel JR, Skinner JD, 1987. Social relationships and dispersal patterns in a clan of spotted hyaenas (Crocuta crocuta) in the Kruger National Park. S Afric J Zool 22: 18-24.
Hofer H, East ML, 1995. Population dynamics, population size, and the commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyaenas. In: Serengeti II: dynamics, management, and conservation of an ecosystem (Sinclair ARE, Arcese P, eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 332-363.
Holekamp KE, Boydston EE, Szykman M, Graham I, Nutt KJ, Birch S, Piskiel A, Singh M, 1999. Vocal recognition in the spotted hyaena and its possible implications regarding the evolution of intelligence. Anim Behav 58: 383-395.[ISI][Medline]
Holekamp KE, Smale L, 1990. Provisioning and food-sharing by lactating spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). Ethology 86: 191-202.
Holekamp KE, Smale L, 1993. Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyaenas: juvenile rank relations with other immature individuals. Anim Behav 46: 451-466.
Holekamp KE, Smale L, 1998. Dispersal status influences hormones and behavior in the male spotted hyena. Horm Behav 33: 205-216.[Medline]
Holekamp KE, Smale L, Szykman M, 1996. Rank and reproduction in the female spotted hyaena. J Reprod Fert 108: 229-237.[Abstract]
Holekamp KE, Cooper SM, Katona CI, Berry NA, Frank LG, Smale L, 1997. Patterns of association among female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). J Mamm 78: 55-64.
Kays RW, Gittleman JL, Wayne RK, 2000. Microsatellite analysis of kinkajou social organization. Mol Ecol 9: 743-751.[Medline]
Keane B, Waser PM, Creel SR, Creel NM, Elliot LF, Minchella DJ, 1994. Subordinate reproduction in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav 47: 65-75.
Koenig WD, Haydock J, 2001. Dividing up the kids.
Science 291:
442-443.
Kruuk H, 1972. The spotted hyena: a study of predation and social behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Libants S, Olle E, Oswald K, Scribner KT, 2000. Microsatellite loci in the spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta. Mol Ecol 9: 1443-1445.[Medline]
Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM, 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.[Medline]
Martin P, Bateson P, 1988. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews LH, 1939. Reproduction in the spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta (Erxleben). Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 230: 1-78.
Meagher TR, 1986. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chemaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. Am Nat 128: 199-215.[ISI]
Melnick DJ, 1987. The genetic consequences of primate social organization: a review of macaques, baboons, and vervet monkeys. Genetica 73: 117-135.[ISI][Medline]
Mills MGL, 1990. Kalahari hyaenas: comparative behavioural ecology of two species. London: Unwin Hyman.
Packard JM, Seal US, Mech DL, Plotka ED, 1985. Causes of reproductive failure in two family groups of wolves (Canis lupus). Z Tierpsychol 69: 24-40.
Packer C, Pusey AE, 1983. Adaptations of female lions to infanticide by incoming males. Am Nat 121: 716-728.
Packer C, Gilbert DA, Pusey AE, O'Brien SJ, 1991. A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature 351: 562-565.
Pemberton JM, Albon SD, Guiness FE, Cluttonbrock TH, Dover GA,
1992. Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA
fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav Ecol
3: 66-75.
Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Wilson K, 2001. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409: 681-682.[Medline]
Pusey A, Packer C, 1987. Dispersal and philopatry. In: Primate societies (Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT, eds). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 250-266.
Pusey A, Packer C, 1997. The ecology of relationships. In: Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th ed (Krebs JR, Davies NB, eds). Oxford: Blackwell; 254-283.
Ramsay MA, Stirling I, 1986. On the mating system of polar bears. Can J Zool 64: 2142-2151.
Reeve HK, Emlen ST, Keller L, 1998. Reproductive
sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by
dominant breeders? Behav Ecol 9:
267-278.
Schneider KM, 1926. Uber Hyanenzucht. Die Pelztierzucht 2: 1-14.
Sherman PW, Jarvis JUM, Alexander RD, 1991. The biology of the naked mole-rat. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Smale L, Frank LG, Holekamp KE, 1993. Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyenas: juvenile rank relations with adults. Anim Behav 46: 467-477.
Smale L, Nunes S, Holekamp KE, 1997. Sexually dimorphic dispersal in mammals: patterns, causes and consequences. Adv Study Behav 26: 181-250.
Smith DG, 1993. A 15-year study of the association between dominance rank and reproductive success of male rhesus macaques. Primates 34: 471-480.
Stenseth NC, Lidicker WZ, 1992. Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Szykman M, 2001. Sexual behavior and male mate choice in the spotted hyena, Crocuta crocuta (PhD dissertation). East Lansing: Michigan State University.
Szykman M, Engh AL, Scribner KT, Van Horn RC, Funk SM, Holekamp KE, 2001. Association patterns among male and female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) reflect male mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50: 231-238.
Thompson EA, 1975. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet 39: 173-188.[ISI][Medline]
Tilson RT, Hamilton WJ, 1984. Social dominance and feeding patterns of spotted hyaenas. Anim Behav 32: 715-724.
Vehrencamp SL, 1983. A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim Behav 31: 667-682.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Awata, D. Heg, H. Munehara, and M. Kohda Testis size depends on social status and the presence of male helpers in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Julidochromis ornatus Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Heg, R. Bergmuller, D. Bonfils, O. Otti, Z. Bachar, R. Burri, G. Heckel, and M. Taborsky Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 419 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Harrison, J. K. Mazet, K. E. Holekamp, E. Dubovi, A. L. Engh, K. Nelson, R. C. Van Horn, and L. Munson ANTIBODIES TO CANINE AND FELINE VIRUSES IN SPOTTED HYENAS (CROCUTA CROCUTA) IN THE MASAI MARA NATIONAL RESERVE J. Wildl. Dis., January 1, 2004; 40(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||







