Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on May 7, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2007 18(4):701-708; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm033
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The role of breeding system on ant ecological dominance: genetic analysis of Ectatomma tuberculatum
a Laboratoire d'Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée UMR CNRS 7153, Université Paris 13, 99 avenue J.-B. Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France b UPA Laboratório de Mirmecologia, Convênio UESC/CEPLAC, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, C.P.7, 45600-000 Itabuna, Bahia, Brazil c Laboratoire Fonctionnement et Evolution, des Systèmes Ecologiques, UMR CNRS 7625, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bat A, 7ème étage, 7 quai St Bernard, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France
Address correspondence to L. Zinck. E-mail: lea.zinck{at}leec.univ-paris13.fr.
Received 16 January 2007; revised 20 March 2007; accepted 21 March 2007.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
Social insects exhibit a great variability in their social organization, and this affects colony kin structure, relatedness among nest mates, and population genetic structure. In the mosaic of arboreal ants of neotropical habitats, mutually exclusive dominant ant species occupy different territories, and their nest distribution is spatially aggregated in patches influencing patterns of population genetic structure. In this study, we performed an analysis of the population and colony genetic structure of the facultative polygynous ant Ectatomma tuberculatum to investigate how the particular breeding and social system of this species can explain its ecological dominance in the mosaic. Within-nest genetic analysis revealed that relatedness between nest mate workers was significantly greater than zero (r = 0.30) with an effective number of queens per nest of Ne = 2.5–3, indicating that polygyny is functional in this species. Moreover, we found that queen number was highly variable, probably due to queen adoption events, leading to the prevalence of polygyny over monogyny. Finally, the strong population genetic structure and the significant isolation by distance suggested that both budding and polydomy take place in this species. The respective role of secondary polygyny, budding, and polydomy are then discussed in the context of the mosaic of arboreal ants, and we propose that this particular social organization ensures the ecological dominance of E. tuberculatum by optimizing the colonization of new available nesting sites and by increasing territory size.
Key words: ants, ecological dominance, interspecific competition, polydomy, polygyny.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
Hamilton's (1964)
kin selection theory provides a coherent framework to explain the evolution of altruistic behaviors that emphasizes the importance of genetic relatedness between altruistic and recipient individuals. In social insects, the pattern of relatedness between individuals of the colony plays a crucial role for predicting social conflicts and their outcomes (Keller and Chapuisat 2001; Tarpy et al. 2004; Ratnieks et al. 2006). Not surprisingly, with the development of highly variable markers such as microsatellites (Queller et al. 1993; Goldstein and Schlötterer 1999; Ross et al. 1999), a large number of molecular studies have been conducted to estimate this parameter (Bourke and Franks 1995; Crozier and Pamilo 1996; Pamilo et al. 1997; Ross 2001). In ants, the relatedness between nest mate workers appears to be highly variable ranging from full-sister relationships (r = 0.75) to completely unrelated nest mate workers (r = 0) (Ross and Keller 1995; Giraud et al. 2002; Van der Hammen et al. 2002).
The pattern of relatedness within a social group and the population genetic structure are affected by the breeding system and the colony mode of foundation (Bourke and Franks 1995; Ross 2001). The breeding system corresponds to the number of breeders in the social group, their genetic relationships (in association with their dispersal abilities), and the distribution of reproduction among them (Ross 2001). Polygyny (i.e., several queens coexisting in the same colony) and polyandry (i.e., queen mating with several males) are the 2 main reproductive strategies known to decrease the relatedness among nest mate workers (Pamilo 1991). The dispersal abilities of reproductive individuals are closely linked to the mode of colony foundation (Bourke and Franks 1995). Independent colony foundation by one or several queens without the help of workers is generally associated with nuptial flights with long-range dispersal and mating away from the natal nest. This high dispersal ability results in random mating with no genetic structure within a population. In contrast, when the queen founds a new colony with the help of workers (dependent colony foundation), the dispersal ability is restricted to the walking distance of workers that can result in population genetic viscosity with neighboring colonies being genetically more similar than distant ones (Pamilo et al. 1997).
Natural habitat characteristics (e.g., fragmented or continuous) can also affect the pattern of population genetic structure through effects on dispersal of sexuals (Clémencet et al. 2005). Moreover, in seemingly continuous habitats, species distribution can be influenced by ecological factors such as food resources, environmental conditions, and interspecific competition (Leston 1978; Davidson 1997). Typically in Neotropical environments, the characteristic "patchwork" or "mosaic" distribution of the arboreal ants results from such ecological features (Room 1971; Leston 1978; Majer 1993). Thus, in these habitats, mutually exclusive dominant ant species occupy different groups of trees and their nests are spatially aggregated in patches, influencing in turn patterns of population genetic structure.
In the mosaic of arboreal ants of cocoa plantations in Bahia State, Brazil, 3 main species are considered as ecologically dominant: Wasmannia auropunctata, Azteca chartifex spiriti, and Ectatomma tuberculatum (Majer et al. 1994; de Medeiros et al. 1995). Interestingly, different breeding systems and social organizations characterize these species. Wasmannia auropunctata (Myrmicinae) is a highly polygynous and polydomous species, known to be unicolonial with no aggressive behavior occurring between individuals from different colonies. Moreover, new colonies are thought to be founded by budding (Hölldobler and Wilson 1977, 1990; Passera 1994). In contrast, A. chartifex spiriti (Dolichoderinae) is a monogynous and polydomous species highly territorial and aggressive (de Medeiros 1992). Ectatomma tuberculatum (Ectatomminae) is a facultatively polygynous species with half of the nests containing 2–26 queens (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005). However, nothing is known about the colony mode of foundation or the dispersal strategies of sexuals in this region. Polydomy has been suggested to occur in populations from Mexico (Garcia-Perez et al. 1991), French Guiana (Richard FJ, personal communication) and Brazil (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005). However, polydomy remains less clear in E. tuberculatum than in A. chartifex spiriti, for example, because of low level of intraspecific aggression in Brazilian population of E. tuberculatum (Fénéron et al. 1999).
The aim of our work was to further investigate the breeding system and population genetic structure of the ecological dominant ant E. tuberculatum, which seems to show a particularly complex social organization. We thus perform a genetic analysis using microsatellite markers to answer 3 specific questions. 1) what is the level of relatedness among nest mates in this facultative polygynous ant species? 2) what are the dispersal abilities and the mode of colony foundation? and 3) how the breeding system and the social organization of this ant can explain its ecological dominance?
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
Sampling and genetic analysis
To investigate the aggregated nest distribution of E. tuberculatum, 3 hierarchical levels were distinguished: the nest, the patch, and the locality levels. The nest level refers to the nest itself, built at the basis of a tree, along the main root, and containing one or several queens (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005
). A visible chimney of 10–30 cm long constructed at the nest entrance (Delabie 1990) allows the location, marking, and mapping of nests in the field. Nest distribution is heterogeneous and forms areas of tens to hundreds of square meters with clusters of nests (Delabie 1989, 1990) that we identified as patches. Nests within a same patch were typically distant from a few meters from one another, whatever the number of nests per patch, which appeared to be highly variable (ranging from 16 to 306 with mean ± standard error [SE] = 57.8 ± 69.7). Between 2 patches not a single nest of E. tuberculatum can be found, and the minimum distance between nests used in this study to consider that they belonged to 2 different patches was of 100 m. The locality level corresponds to a cluster of patches grouped in a few square kilometers area. In this study, 3 localities in Bahia, Brazil, were studied: Itabuna, Uruçuca, and Buerarema, distant from 17 to 34 km (Figure 1).
|
The genetic structure at a large spatial scale was investigated by sampling workers from Itabuna, Uruçuca, and Buerarema localities, in 5 patches per locality and 10 nests per patch (n = 150) (Figure 1). A single worker per nest was analyzed to avoid use of nonindependent genotypes caused by sampling genetically related workers. Sampled patches within a locality were distant from a mean of 1.6 ± 0.2 km (range 0.1–3.8 km for the most distant ones, see Figure 1).
To study genetic structure at a fine spatial scale and to reliably estimate the number of queens per nest, 20 workers per nest were sampled in 3 patches of Itabuna locality (Patch 1–3 surrounded in Figure 1) (n = 1080). Within each patch, nests were sampled along a transect. These 3 transects were 131 m, 74 m, and 49 m long (transect length was depending on patch size) and consisted of 29, 13, and 12 nests, respectively, with an average distance between nests of 4.8 m (±0.7).
DNA was extracted from the head and thorax of workers using a standard 10% Chelex protocol. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed as described in Hora, Doums, et al. (2005) with 6 fluorescent-labeled microsatellite primers: L17, L84, L90, L92, L134, and L164 (Poteaux et al. 2003). We assessed PCR products length with an ABI 310 automated sequencer and scored allele sizes with the GENESCAN corresponding software.
Population genetic analysis
For the large-scale sampling, genetic diversity was estimated for each locality by the number of alleles and the expected heterozygosity using the web implementation (version 3.1c) of the program GENEPOP (Raymond and Rousset 1995). The inbreeding coefficients (Fis) were estimated using the locality or the patch as the reference population with the F statistics (SmallF) of Weir and Cockerham (1984) using FSTAT 2.9.3.2
[EC]
(Goudet 2001). The SEs were obtained by jackknifing over loci. Exact tests for Hardy–Weinberg proportions were tested by using 15 000 randomizations of alleles within samples with the same software. Genetic differentiation (Fst) was estimated at 2 hierarchical levels: between patches within each locality (i.e., patches considered as populations) and between localities (i.e., localities considered as populations), and the SEs were obtained by jackknifing over loci with FSTAT 2.9.3.2
[EC]
. Genetic differentiations were tested using the GENEPOP program, and a Bonferroni correction was performed over the obtained P values. To evaluate the amount of genetic variance at the different hierarchical levels (among localities and among patches within locality), we performed an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) using the program ARLEQUIN (Schneider et al. 2000). Tests for differences among localities and patches for allelic richness, observed heterozygosity, gene diversity, inbreeding coefficient, and genetic differentiation were performed with patches considered as populations, using comparison among groups of samples option of FSTAT 2.9.3.2
[EC]
software, 2-sided P values being obtained after 10 000 permutations. A pattern of isolation by distance (IBD) between patches over all localities was tested using a Mantel test with 10 000 permutations performed with the GENEPOP web implementation program of Raymond and Rousset (1995). Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated between the transformed matrix of pairwise Fst (i.e., Fst/(1 – Fst)) and the matrix of ln-transformed geographical distances.
For the fine-scale sampling, genetic differentiation (Fst) was estimated as described above, F statistics being estimated between nests (i.e., nests considered as populations), and genetic differentiations were tested between nests with the GENEPOP program. A second AMOVA was performed with this genetic data set to evaluate the amount of genetic variance at a fine spatial scale among patches and among nests using the program ARLEQUIN. A pattern of IBD between nests within each transect was tested by plotting the modified Fst (i.e., Fst/(1-Fst)) against the ln-transformed geographical distance and using a Mantel test with 10 000 permutations as described above to estimate the level of significance of the obtained Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Moreover, to analyze the spatial genetic structure within patch, spatial autocorrelation analysis was performed using the program SPAGEDI 1.2 (Hardy and Vekemans 2002). Moran's I statistics were calculated for diploid multilocus worker genotypes for class of geographical distances of 25 m. P values on Moran's I statistics were obtained by performing 10 000 permutations of spatial locations of individuals within each class.
Within-nest genetic analysis
The inbreeding coefficient (Fit) of nest mate workers were estimated with the F statistics (CapF) using FSTAT 2.9.3.2
[EC]
(Goudet 2001) and the genetic data of the 3 transects (i.e., 20 workers per nest) using the transect as the reference population. SEs were obtained by jackknifing over loci. The significance of the inbreeding estimates was evaluated with exact tests of Hardy–Weinberg proportions over all nests at the transect level using 15 000 randomizations (Goudet et al. 1996). Regression relatedness coefficients among nest mate workers were calculated using the same genetic data set and the 3 transects being labeled as different deme with the program RELATEDNESS 4.2 (Queller and Goodnight 1989). SEs of r were obtained by jackknifing over colony, and colonies were weighted equally. Student's t-tests were performed to compare inbreeding coefficients to the reference value of zero and relatedness estimates to the theoretical value of r = 0.75 (Sokal and Rohlf 1995).
We looked for the presence of multiple queens per nest using the program MATESOFT 1.0 (Moilanen et al. 2004), which performed parentage analysis based on worker genotypes found in the 54 nests sampled in the 3 patches. Allele frequencies for computations in MATESOFT were calculated for each patch using the program RELATEDNESS 4.2 (Queller and Goodnight 1989).
The effective number of reproductive queens (Ne) was estimated from the relatedness among nest mate workers (rw–w) with the formula Ne(1) = 3/(4rw–w) assuming 1) unrelated equally fecund queens, 2) no inbreeding, and 3) monoandry. Alternatively, assuming equal relatedness among queens and workers (i.e., queens stay in their natal nests and mate with unrelated males), the effective number of related queens was estimated as Ne(2) = (3 – rw–w)/(3rw–w) (e.g., Pamilo 1991). We compared our results with the data already known about the number of queens per nests in E. tuberculatum (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005). Considering both the monogynous (n = 40) and polygynous colonies (n = 48) collected in the same site of Itabuna, Hora, Vilela, et al. (2005) found a harmonic mean number of queens per nest equal to Nh = 1.5 (±3.3).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
Population genetic analysis
Considering the entire sample, the average number of alleles per locus was 6.8, ranging from 3 to 12 alleles with a mean gene diversity of 0.56 (0.23–0.79) (Table 1).
|
The level of gene diversity was very similar for the 3 localities studied (Table 1). The 3 localities did not differ by their allelic richness (range 5.5–6, P = 0.611), observed heterozygosity (P = 0.710), gene diversity (0.55–0.58, P = 0.236), or inbreeding coefficient (Fis) (P = 0.637). Even if inbreeding coefficient values for each locality (Fis) were found to be negative (range –0.18 to –0.14, Table 1), they did not differ significantly from zero (Itabuna: t = 0.94, P = 0.45; Uruçuca: t = 1.25, P = 0.34; Buerarema: t = 1.18, P = 0.36; and all localities: t = 3.00, P = 0.10), and Hardy–Weinberg proportions were found to be respected within each locality. Moreover, at the patch level, Fis were either positive or negative depending on the locus and the patch but similarly no patch at any locus departed from Hardy–Weinberg's equilibrium (Supplementary data). This indicates that random mating seems to occur both at the locality and the patch level.
At the large spatial scale, the estimates of genetic differentiation between localities and between patches within a locality were all highly significant although they showed low Fst values (ranging from 0.029 to 0.073, Table 2). Furthermore, the 3 localities did not differ significantly by their level of genetic differentiation Fst (P = 0.399). The AMOVA showed that 97.17% of genetic variance was due to genetic differentiation within patch and that most of the remaining genetic variance was observed between patches rather than between localities (Table 3). When examining pairwise genetic differentiation between patches, 51 out of the 105 pairs of patches showed a significant genetic differentiation after a Bonferroni correction. Moreover, a significant positive correlation was found between pairwise genetic differentiation of patches and their geographical distances (Rs = 0.012, P < 10–5), indicating that IBD occurs at a large spatial scale.
|
|
At the fine spatial scale, genetic differentiation between nests within each patch was strong with a mean Fst (±SE) = 0.128 ± 0.02. The 3 focal patches did not differ significantly by their level of genetic differentiation (P = 0.493). Genetic differentiation between nests was equal to Fst = 0.147 ± 0.02 in patch 1; Fst = 0.137 ± 0.02 in patch 2; and Fst = 0.100 ± 0.01 in patch 3, all the exact tests for genetic differentiation being highly significant (P < 0.0001). The AMOVA revealed that genetic variance was due to between nests and between patches differences, both variances being significantly different from zero (Table 4). Nevertheless, a larger part of the genetic variance was explained by differentiation among nests. A significant positive correlation between pairwise genetic differentiation of nests and their geographical distances was found in 2 patches (patch 1, Rs = 0.048, P < 0.0001 and patch 3, Rs = 0.022, P = 0.004), whereas a similar pattern of IBD was marginally significant in patch 2 (Rs = 0.021, P = 0.075). Similarly, along each transect, Moran's indexes that reflect genetic similarities among individuals were found to decrease linearly with geographical distance, confirming that neighboring nests are more genetically related than more distant ones. Spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed a similar shape of spatial structuring in the 3 transects even if they were of different lengths (Figure 2), indicating that patterns of genetic viscosity were comparable among patches.
|
|
Within-nest genetic analysis
For the 3 focal patches, the inbreeding coefficients of workers (Fit) did not differ significantly from zero (Table 5). Moreover, the exact tests of randomizations for testing Hardy–Weinberg proportions were not significantly different from zero (Table 5).
|
The average within-nest genetic relatedness among nest mate workers was significantly greater than zero with rw–w (±SE) = 0.30 ± 0.03 (t = 9.53, P = 0.011) and lower than 0.75 (t = 14.26, P = 0.005). Genetic relatedness among nest mate workers did not differ significantly between patches (tpatch 1/patch 2 = 0.10, P = 0.93; tpatch 1/patch 3 = 0.55, P = 0.64; tpatch 2/patch 3 = 0.54, P = 0.64) (Table 5). The breeding system varied greatly among nests because within-nest genetic relatedness varied from 0 to 0.74 (Figure 3). The distribution of nest mate worker relatedness estimates was not bimodal in any studied patch but rather continuous with intermediate values of relatedness (Figure 3). Most of the nests likely had a polygynous social organization with low intranest relatedness. Matesoft analysis of parentage gave similar results with 35 nests (64.8%) detected as polygynous and only 5 nests (9.3%) corresponding to full-sib genotypes that is monogynous and monoandrous nests. The mean relatedness within nest rw–w = 0.30 ± 0.03 corresponds to an effective queen number Ne(1) = 2.5 (95% CI: 2.1–3.1), if queens are not related, and Ne (2) = 3.0 (95% CI: 2.5–3.8), if queens are assumed to be as related as workers (Table 5). These values were indeed consistent with the harmonic mean number of queens per nest Nh = 1.5 (±3.3) found by Hora, Vilela, et al. (2005)
by collecting 88 colonies in this same locality of Itabuna between 1996 and 2001.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
The genetic analysis of nest mate workers of the ant E. tuberculatum established that polygyny is functional in this species, several mated queens being involved in the reproduction within a colony, as previously shown by behavioral data (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005
). The relatedness between nest mate workers was indeed found to be significantly higher than zero and lower than 0.75 with an average of 0.30. Moreover, the effective number of reproductive queens estimated from this relatedness value (2.5 unrelated queens or 3 related queens per nest) was not significantly different from the harmonic mean number of queens collected per nest (Nh = 1.5 ± 3.3; Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005), indicating that polygyny alone can explain within-nest genetic relatedness. Thus, neither polyandry (i.e., several mates per queen) nor reproductive skew among queens is likely to occur in this species. The absence of polyandry is not surprising because it is rather rare in social insects and particularly in polygynous species (Keller and Reeve 1994; Crozier and Fjerdingstad 2001; Strassmann 2001). However, reproductive skew among queens is often found in polygynous colonies (Bourke and Franks 1995), and our results reveal that all queens of E. tuberculatum actually contribute equally to the production of workers. This is in agreement with behavioral observations that showed that all queens were egg layers and that no apparent dominance hierarchy or agonistic behavior took place in these Brazilian polygynous colonies (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005).
The large variation of relatedness values showed that the social organization varied greatly among nests in queen number and/or in the degree of relatedness among them. The continuous distribution of nest mate worker relatedness within patch suggested that monogyny and polygyny are not 2 distinct alternative strategies. Moreover, because only 5% of the studied nests were found to be monogynous, polygyny clearly prevails in E. tuberculatum, and it likely results from queen adoptions (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005) and queen turnover (i.e., queen loss and/or queen replacement) as in most polygynous species (Keller 1995). Monogyny therefore corresponds to a transitory state of the colony, which is likely to be succeeded by polygyny.
Population genetic analysis of E. tuberculatum revealed strong genetic structuring both at fine and large spatial scales. Limited dispersal of sexuals (female and/or male) and polydomy (i.e., several nests constituting a single colony unit) can both explain the pattern of IBD found within a given patch. Genetic IBD from limited dispersal of females generally corresponds to dependent colony foundation (i.e., queens found new colonies with the help of workers in the proximity of their natal nests) (Hölldobler and Wilson 1977; Pamilo 1991; Rosengren et al. 1993; Bourke and Franks 1995; Keller 1995). In contrast, limited dispersal of flying queens followed by independent colony foundation is unlikely to give rise to such genetic viscosity. Dependent colony foundation thus seems to occur in E. tuberculatum, and the absence of inbreeding suggests that male dispersal is not as restricted as female dispersal. Differential dispersal strategies between males and females may exist in E. tuberculatum, but mitochondrial genetic analysis would be required to confirm this hypothesis. In this case, mating in E. tuberculatum could therefore take place as in other polygynous species (Bourke and Franks 1995), near the female natal nest, between nonrelatives.
In addition to the low female dispersal, in polydomous species, nests can stay interconnected after budding through worker exchanges (Pamilo and Rosengren 1984; Boomsma et al. 1990; Chapuisat et al. 1997; Pedersen and Boomsma 1999). Given that worker exchanges between nests are likely to decrease with geographical distance, polydomy also results in a pattern of genetic viscosity with microgeographic genetic structure. Pattern of IBD has been detected in many polygynous and often also polydomous species (Pamilo 1983; Crozier et al. 1984; Pamilo and Rosengren 1984; Seppä and Pamilo 1995; Chapuisat et al. 1997; Tay et al. 1997; Pedersen and Boomsma 1999). In E. tuberculatum, polydomy has already been suggested to occur (e.g., Garcia-Perez et al. 1991; Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005) and our population genetic analysis tends to confirm that. The similar pattern of spatial autocorrelation found in the 3 patches for the same classes of geographical distances suggested that worker exchanges between neighboring nests, occurring over fixed distances of the order of colony boundaries, likely play an important role in the observed genetic viscosity. Moreover, around a given distance (20–30 m, Figure 2), the pattern of IBD does not seem to hold any more suggesting that nests could not belong to the same colony over this distance. The absence of aggression between workers coming from nests distant from 3 m (Zinck et al. submitted) also strongly supports the occurrence of polydomy in this species.
Secondary polygyny, budding, and polydomy are biological traits often linked to each other in ants. Indeed, polygyny resulting from queen adoptions typically leads to larger colony size (e.g., Janzen 1973; Satoh 1989; Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005), and it also favors reproduction by budding (Keller 1991). Moreover, budding can easily produce multinest organization if buds stay connected through worker exchanges (Rosengren, et al. 1993). Considering our genetic analysis and previous behavioral study (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005), we assume first that larger colony size is achieved in E. tuberculatum by polygyny and polydomy; second that variable queen number results from queen adoptions and budding.
In the mosaic of arboreal ants, given that 90–97% of the trees are occupied by dominant ants (Majer 1993), living space is one of the resources in the shortest supply (Leston 1973; Davidson 1997). In these habitats where available space without dominant ants is rare, competition can take place at 2 stages: either between adjacent mature colonies or between young queens and recently established colonies (Majer 1976, 1993). As the success rate to found new colonies is generally higher by budding than by independent colony foundation (Rosengren 1993; Peeters and Ito 2001), and especially in the mosaic of arboreal ants (Majer 1976, 1993), dependent colony foundation appears to be particularly advantageous in these habitats. Colonization of new nesting site therefore corresponds to lateral spread of existing colonies, either in space between colonies or after the death of neighboring colonies (Majer 1976). Polygyny also plays an important role in the colonization process because larger sizes of multiple-queen colonies in comparison with monogynous colonies (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005) lead to increased colony productivity (Herbers 1984; Walin et al. 2001). Moreover, polygyny and polydomy, in increasing the ability to monopolize resources (McIver 1991; Human and Gordon 1996; Davidson 1997; Holway and Case 2000) and the protection of the colony against predators and competitors (Nonacs 1988; Herbers 1993; McGlynn et al. 2004; Denis et al. 2006), ensure colony longevity and as a consequence, E. tuberculatum occurrence.
Three main species are characterized as ecologically dominant in the mosaic of cocoa agrosystems of Bahia, Brazil: E. tuberculatum, W. auropunctata, and A. chartifex spiriti (de Medeiros 1995). Ecological dominance is considered to result from both numerical and behavioral dominance (i.e., dominance in interspecific competition due to superior fighting and/or recruitment abilities) (Adams 1994; Davidson 1998). In W. auropunctata and A. chartifex spiriti, dominance seems to be achieved through unicoloniality and opportunistic strategy for W. auropunctata (Wetterer and Porter 2003) and high levels of aggression and territoriality for A. chartifex spiriti (de Medeiros 1992; Adams 1994). In E. tuberculatum, reduced queen fecundity (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005) is likely compensated by polygyny. The flexibility of queen number may also be a key factor responsible of the ecological dominance of this ant. The regulation of queen number and colony size by queen adoptions and worker exchanges could indeed allow budding to occur at any time. Such plasticity could thus assure E. tuberculatum to take advantage of any nesting site opportunities, particularly at the edge of the patches. Colony size is indeed determinant in between-colonies competition at territory edges (Adams 1990), and environmental factors are known to affect reproductive allocation among polydomous nests (Sundström 1995; Walin et al. 2001). Moreover, variation in queen number can be due to queen transport between nests as observed in other polygynous polydomous species (e.g., Wilson 1971; Mabelis 1979). In addition, E. tuberculatum workers could play a direct role in queen number regulation because they are directly involved in queen adoption and actively bring back new queens for adoption inside the nest (Hora, Vilela, et al. 2005). They could therefore choose on the basis of the information they get about the different polydomous nests, the one requiring a new queen most.
To conclude, dominant species in the mosaic of arboreal ants share common properties such as being broad-spectrum predators, tending Homoptera and collecting honeydews and extrafloral nectaries (Leston 1973, 1978). However, different breeding systems and social organizations can be found in association with these general traits and result in ecological dominance. In E. tuberculatum, secondary polygyny with flexible queen number and budding result in a social organization within a given patch that ensures to maintain its ecological dominance in the mosaic of cocoa agrosystems. Further investigations about the relationship between nests might be interesting to do to determine in which extent a patch of E. tuberculatum could correspond to a supercolony. Indeed, if no aggression occurs between nonnest mate workers within a given patch, the definition of unicoloniality would be fulfilled (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990) and unicoloniality could contribute to E. tuberculatum ecological dominance as in W. auropunctata (Ulloa Chacón and Cherix 1990).
|
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
Supplementary data can be found at http://www.beheco.oxfordjournals.org/.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank N. Châline, J. Clémencet, C. Tirrard, and T. Monnin for their helpful comments on the manuscript, and J. H. C. Delabie and the CEPLAC staff for their great help during our field trips. This work was supported by a French research grant "Action Concertée Incitative jeunes chercheurs 2001" ACI n°5183 and the "Bureau des Relations Internationales de l'Université Paris 13". R.R.H. received financial support from CNPq, Brazil (3098552003-9). Research was permitted by the Brazilian Minister of Science and Technology (licence n°0107/2004).
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALREFERENCES |
|---|
Adams ES. Boundary disputes in the territorial ant Azteca trigona: effects of asymmetries in colony size. Anim Behav (1990) 39:321–328.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Adams ES. Territory defense by the ant Azteca trigona: maintenance of an arboreal ant mosaic. Oecologia (1994) 97:203–208.
Boomsma JJ, Brouwer AH, Van Loon AJ. A new polygynous Lasius species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from central Europe. II. Allozymatic confirmation of species status and social structure. Insect Soc (1990) 37:363–375.[CrossRef]
Bourke AFG, Franks NR. Social evolution in ants (1995) Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
Chapuisat M, Goudet J, Keller L. Microsatellites reveal high population viscosity and limited dispersal in the ant Formica paralugubris. Evolution (1997) 51:475–482.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Clémencet J, Viginier B, Doums C. Hierarchical analysis of population genetic structure in the monogynous ant Cataglyphis cursor using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Mol Ecol (2005) 14:3735–3744.[CrossRef][Medline]
Crozier RH, Fjerdingstad EJ. Polyandry in social Hymenoptera—disunity in diversity? Ann Zool Fenn (2001) 38:267–285.
Crozier RH, Pamilo P. Evolution of social insect colonies: sex allocation and kin selection (1996) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crozier RH, Pamilo P, Crozier YC. Relatedness and microgeographic genetic variation in Rhytidoponera mayri, an Australian arid-zone ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1984) 15:143–150.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Davidson DW. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol J Linn Soc (1997) 61:153–181.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Davidson DW. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol (1998) 23:484–490.[CrossRef]
Delabie JHC. Escolha do local de nidificação em Ectatomma tuberculatum (Formicidae: Ponerinae). (1989) In: Resumos do Simpósio Latino Americano sobre Insetos Sociais Neotropicais. IUSSI, Seção Latinoamericana, Regional Brasileira, F. Caetao(org.), UNESP, Rio Claro, São Paulo (Brazil). p. 23.
Delabie JHC. The ant problems of cocoa farms in Brazil. In: Applied myrmecology, a world perspective—Vander Meer RK, Jaffe K, Cedeno A, eds. (1990) Boulder (CO): Westview Press. 555–569.
de Medeiros MA. Ecologia e comportamento de Azteca chartifex spiriti Forel (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) e sua perspectiva como agente de controle biologia natural de pragas de cacueiros em Ilheus, Bahia (1992) Rio Claro (Brazil): UNESP.
de Medeiros MA, Fowler HG, Bueno OC. Ant (Hym. Formicidae) mosaic stability in Bahian cocoa plantations: implications for management. J Appl Entomol (1995) 119:411–414.
Denis D, Orivel J, Hora RR, Chameron S, Fresneau D. First record of polydomy in a monogynous ponerine ant: a means to allow emigration between Pachycondyla goeldii nests. J Insect Behav (2006) 19:279–291.[CrossRef]
Fénéron R, Nowbahari E, Dutrou F. Reconnaissance intercoloniale et niveau d'agression chez la fourmi ponérine, Ectatomma tuberculum. Actes Coll Insect Soc (1999) 12:33–36.
Garcia-Perez JA, Pena-Sanchez R, Camargo-Huiqui P, Champalbert A. Rutas de forrajeo utilizadas por Ectatomma tuberculatum O. (Hymenoptera, Ponerinae) en una plantacion de cacao en el Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. Folia Entomol Mex (1991) 82:161–171.
Giraud T, Pedersen JS, Keller L. Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99:6075–6079.
Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C. Microsatellites: evolution and applications (1999) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GoudetJ. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3) [Internet]. Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Accessed 2005 Jan 26.
Goudet J, Raymond M, de-Meeus T, Rousset F. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics (1996) 144:1933–1940.[Abstract]
Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I, II. J Theor Biol (1964) 7:1–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes (2002) 2:618–620.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Herbers JM. Queen-worker conflict and eusocial evolution in a polygynous ant species. Evolution (1984) 38:631–643.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Herbers JM. Ecological determinants of queen number in ants. In: Queen number and sociality in insects—Keller L, ed. (1993) Oxford: Oxford University Press. 262–293.
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften (1977) 64:8–15.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. The ants (1990) Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press.
Holway D, Case T. Mechanisms of dispersed central-place foraging in polydomous colonies of the Argentine ant. Anim Behav (2000) 59:433–441.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hora RR, Doums C, Poteaux C, Fénéron R, Valenzuela J, Heinze J, Fresneau D. Small queens in the ant Ectatomma tuberculatum: a new case of social parasitism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2005) 59:285–292.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Hora RR, Vilela E, Fénéron R, Pezon A, Fresneau D, Delabie J. Facultative polygyny in Ectatomma tuberculatum (Formicidae, Ectatomminae). Insect Soc (2005) 52:194–200.[CrossRef]
Human KG, Gordon DM. Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia (1996) 105:405–412.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Janzen DH. Evolution of polygynous obligate acacia-ants in western Mexico. J Anim Ecol (1973) 42:727–750.[CrossRef]
Keller L. Queen number, mode of colony founding, and queen reproductive success in ants (Hymenoptera formicidae). Ethol Ecol Evol (1991) 3:307–316.
Keller L. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends Ecol Evol (1995) 10:355–360.[CrossRef]
Keller L, Chapuisat M. Eusociality and cooperation. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (2001) London: Nature Publishing Group. 1–8.
Keller L, Reeve HK. Genetic variability, queen number, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. Evolution (1994) 48:694–704.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Leston D. The ant mosaic—tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. PANS (1973) 19:311–341.
Leston D. A neotropical ant mosaic. Ann Entomol Soc Am (1978) 71:649–653.[Web of Science]
Mabelis AA. Nest splitting by the red wood ant (Formica polyctena Foerster). Neth J Zool (1979) 29:109–125.
Majer JD. The maintenance of the ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. J Appl Ecol (1976) 13:123–144.[CrossRef]
Majer JD. Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia: its structure and influence on ant diversity. In: Hymenoptera and biodiversity—LaSalle J, Gauld ID, eds. (1993) Oxford: CAB International. 115–141.
Majer JD, Delabie JHC, Smith MRB. Arboreal ant community patterns in Brazilian cocoa farms. Biotropica (1994) 26:73–83.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
McGlynn TP, Carr RA, Carson JH, Buma J. Frequent nest relocation in the ant Aphaenogaster araneoides: Resources, competition, and natural enemies. Oikos (2004) 106:611–621.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
McIver JD. Dispersed central place foraging in Australian meat ants. Insect Soc (1991) 38:129–137.[CrossRef]
Moilanen A, Sundström L, Pedersen JS. MATESOFT: a program for deducing parental genotypes and estimating mating system statistics in haplodiploid species. Mol Ecol Notes (2004) 4:795–797.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Nonacs P. Queen number in colonies of social Hymenoptera as a kin-selected adaptation. Evolution (1988) 42:566–580.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Pamilo P. Genetic differentiation within subdivided populations of Formica ants. Evolution (1983) 37:1010–1022.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Pamilo P. Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. II. Number of reproductive individuals. Am Nat (1991) 138:412–433.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Pamilo P, Gertsch P, Thorén P, Seppä P. Molecular population genetics of social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst (1997) 28:1–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Pamilo P, Rosengren R. Evolution of nesting strategies of ants: genetic evidence from different population types of Formica ants. Biol J Linn Soc (1984) 21:331–348.[Web of Science]
Passera L. Characteristics of tramp species. In: Exotic ants: biology, impact and control of introduced species—Williams DF, ed. (1994) Boulder (CO): Westview Press. 23–43.
Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ. Genetic analysis of colony structure in polydomous and polygynous ant populations. Biol J Linn Soc (1999) 66:115–144.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Peeters C, Ito F. Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol (2001) 46:601–630.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Poteaux C, Hora RR, Vautrin D, Fresneau D, Solignac M. Isolation of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the ponerine ant Ectatomma tuberculatum. Mol Ecol Notes (2003) 3:635–637.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Queller DC, Goodnight KF. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution (1989) 43:258–275.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Queller DC, Strassmann JE, Hughes CR. Microsatellites and kinship. Trends Ecol Evol (1993) 8:285–288.[CrossRef]
Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol (2006) 51:581–608.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2) population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered (1995) 86:248–249.
Room PM. The relative distributions of ant species in Ghana's cocoa farms. J Anim Ecol (1971) 40:735–751.[CrossRef]
Rosengren R, Sundström L, Fortelius W. Monogyny and polygyny in Formica ants: the result of alternative dispersal tactics. In: Queen number and sociality in insects—Keller L, ed. (1993) Oxford: Oxford University Press. 308–333.
Ross KG. Molecular ecology of social behaviour: analyses of breeding systems and genetic structure. Mol Ecol (2001) 10:265–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ross KG, Keller L. Ecology and evolution of social organization: insights from fire ants and other highly eusocial insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst (1995) 26:631–656.[Web of Science]
Ross KG, Shoemaker DD, Krieger MJB, DeHeer CJ, Keller L. Assessing genetic structure with multiple classes of molecular markers: a case study involving the introduced fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Mol Biol Evol (1999) 16:525–543.[Abstract]
Satoh T. Comparisons between two apparently distinct forms of Camponotus nawai Ito (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc (1989) 36:277–292.[CrossRef]
Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. ARLEQUIN version 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis (2000) Genetics and Biometry Laboratory: Geneva (Switzerland): University of Geneva.
Seppä P, Pamilo P. Gene flow and population viscosity in Myrmica ants. Heredity (1995) 74:200–209.[Web of Science]
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry (1995) 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman. 174.
Strassmann J. The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymenoptera. Insect Soc (2001) 48:1–13.[CrossRef]
Sundström L. Sex allocation and colony maintenance in monogyne and polygyne colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): the impact of kinship and mating structure. Am Nat (1995) 146:182–201.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Tarpy DR, Gilley DC, Seeley TD. Levels of selection in a social insect: a review of conflict and cooperation during honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen replacement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2004) 55:513–523.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Tay WT, Cook JM, Rowe DJ, Crozier RH. Migration between nests in the Australian arid-zone ant Rhytidoponera sp. 12 revealed by DGGE analyses of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Ecol (1997) 6:403–411.[CrossRef]
Ulloa Chacón D, Cherix D. The little fire ant Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In: Applied myrmecology: a world perspective—Vander Meer RK, Jaffe K, Cedeno A, eds. (1990) Boulder (CO): Westview Press. 281–289.
Van der Hammen T, Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ. Convergent development of low-relatedness supercolonies in Myrmica ants. Heredity (2002) 89:83–89.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Walin L, Seppä P, Sundström L. Reproductive allocation within a polygyne, polydomous colony of the ant Myrmica rubra. Ecol Entomol (2001) 26:537–546.[CrossRef]
Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution (1984) 38:1358–1370.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Wetterer JK, Porter SD. The little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata: distribution, impact, control. Sociobiology (2003) 42:1–41.[Web of Science]
Wilson EO. The insect societies (1971) Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||