Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):272-278; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm128
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/272    most recent
arm128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonckaert, W.
Right arrow Articles by Wenseleers, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bonckaert, W.
Right arrow Articles by Wenseleers, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Worker policing in the German wasp Vespula germanica

Wim Bonckaerta, Kristel Vuerinckxa, Johan Billena, Rob L. Hammondb, Laurent Kellerb and Tom Wenseleersa

a Zoological Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, 3000 Leuven, Belgium b Department of Ecology and Evolution, Bâtiment de Biologie, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Address correspondence to W. Bonckaert, who is now at Laboratory of Entomology, Zoological Institute, Catholic University of Leuven, Naamsestraat 59, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: wim.bonckaert{at}bio.kuleuven.be.

Received 23 September 2007; revised 25 October 2007; accepted 28 October 2007.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
In some ants, bees, and wasps, workers kill or "police" male eggs laid by other workers in order to maintain the reproductive primacy of the queen. Kin selection theory predicts that multiple mating by the queen is one factor that can selectively favor worker policing. This is because when the queen is mated to multiple males, workers are more closely related to the queen's sons than to the sons of other workers. Earlier work has suggested that reproductive patterns in the German wasp Vespula germanica may contradict this theory, because in some colonies a large fraction of the adult males were inferred to be the workers' sons, despite the effective queen mating frequency being greater than 2 (2.4). In the present study, we reexamine the V. germanica case and show that it does support the theory. First, genetic analysis confirms that the effective queen mating frequency is high, 2.9, resulting in workers being more related to the queen's sons than to other workers' sons. Second, behavioral assays show that worker-laid eggs are effectively killed by other workers, despite worker-laid eggs having the same intrinsic viability as queen-laid ones. Finally, we estimate that approximately 58.4% of the male eggs but only 0.44% of the adult males are worker derived in queenright colonies, consistent with worker reproduction being effectively policed.

Key words: reproductive conflict, Vespinae wasps, Vespula germanica, worker policing, worker reproduction.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Major evolutionary transitions (Maynard Smith and Szathmáry 1995Go) require the evolution of mechanisms that moderate within-group conflict (Keller 1999Go; Queller 2000Go; Ratnieks et al. 2006Go). One such mechanism is mutual policing, whereby social control is used to either prevent individuals from acting selfishly or reduce the payoffs from doing so (Ratnieks 1988Go; Frank 1995Go; Frank 2003Go; Wenseleers et al. 2004aGo; Ratnieks and Wenseleers 2005Go, 2007Go; Ratnieks et al. 2006Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006bGo). One of the best examples of mutual policing behavior in nature is found in ants, bees, and wasps, where it is used to inhibit workers from producing their own male offspring (Ratnieks 1988Go; Ratnieks et al. 2006Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). In most species, workers are unable to mate, but they usually possess functional ovaries and are able to lay unfertilized, male-destined eggs (Trivers and Hare 1976Go; Bourke 1988Go; Hammond and Keller 2004Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). Nevertheless, in most species, egg-laying workers are aggressed or the eggs they lay are eaten by either the mother queen or by other workers, a process referred to as queen policing and worker policing, respectively (reviewed in Ratnieks et al. 2006Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo).

Kin selection theory (Hamilton 1964Go) predicts that the queen is selected to carry out such policing because she is more related to her sons (r = 1/2) than to her daughter workers' sons (grandsons, r = 1/4) (Trivers and Hare 1976Go). By contrast, the workers are selected to police particularly when the queen mates with multiple males. This is because the workers are then on average more closely related to queen's sons (brothers, r = 0.25) than to other workers' sons (a mix of full- and half-nephews, r < 0.25) (Starr 1984Go; Woyciechowski and Lomnicki 1987Go; Ratnieks 1988Go). Worker policing, however, can also be selected for under single mating if it has additional benefits, for example, when the policing of reproductive workers increases colony efficiency (Ratnieks 1988Go) or when the removal of worker-laid eggs, which are all male, could help the workers to cause a female-biased sex allocation ratio (Foster and Ratnieks 2001bGo).

Evidence supports both relatedness and secondary productivity or sex ratio benefits as important influences on the occurrence of worker policing (reviewed in Hammond and Keller 2004Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). In particular, worker policing has been found in all species surveyed where queens mate multiple times, for example, in Apis honeybees (Ratnieks and Visscher 1989Go; Halling et al. 2001Go; Oldroyd et al. 2001Go), the common wasp Vespula vulgaris (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo), and Pachycondyla and Acromyrmex ants (D'Ettorre et al. 2004Go; Dijkstra and Boomsma 2004Go) and also in approximately 20% of the species where queens generally mate only once, for example, in the hornet Vespa crabro (Foster et al. 2002Go) and the ant Camponotus floridanus (Endler et al. 2004Go) (reviewed in Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). This is consistent with limited selection for worker policing in species with low mating frequency due to productivity or sex ratio benefits and with strong, universal selection for worker policing in species with high queen mating frequency due to relatedness effects, possibly in combination with efficiency benefits (Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo).

To date, the only possible exception to the pattern that species with high mating frequency generally have low levels of worker reproduction has been found in the yellow jacket Vespula germanica (Goodisman et al. 2002Go). Based on a reanalysis of the original dataset, Hammond and Keller (2004)Go concluded that an average of 22% of the adult males were the workers' sons in this species. This was strongly against expectation, because the effective queen mating frequency in this species was high, 2.4, and worker reproduction would therefore have been expected to be effectively policed (Goodisman et al. 2002Go).

Given this highly anomalous result, we here reexamine the V. germanica and show that it does support the theory. In particular, we show using behavioral assays that worker-laid eggs are effectively killed by other workers, despite worker-laid eggs having the same intrinsic viability as queen-laid ones. The latter rules out the possibility that policing could be aimed at removing worker-laid eggs of low viability (Gadagkar 2004Go; Pirk et al. 2004Go; Nonacs 2006Go, but see Beekman and Oldroyd 2005Go; Helanterä et al. 2006Go). In addition, we estimate that approximately 58.4% of the male eggs but only 0.44% of the adult males are worker derived in queenright colonies. This again implies that worker reproduction is effectively policed, as predicted by theory.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Study organism
Our study is based on 10 colonies of the German wasp V. germanica, which we found in the vicinity of Leuven, Belgium, in August and September 2005 and 2006 (Table 1). Six of the colonies were nesting underground, and 4 were found under rooftops. Seven colonies could be collected in their entirety and were set up in observation boxes after male and female brood was sampled (see below). The actual nests of the other 3 were inaccessible, and so for those only workers were sampled from the nest entrance (Table 1). All collected colonies were queenright, that is, had a laying mother queen present. Nests have a short annual cycle, being founded in spring by a single overwintered and inseminated queen and dying out at the end of October (Spradbery 1973Go). All experiments were carried out at the end of September, at a time when colonies naturally produce new queens and males.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Male parentage, queen mating frequency, paternity skew, and sister–sister relatedness for 10 queenright Vespula germanica colonies

 
Queen mating frequency and worker relatedness
To determine queen mating frequency, we analyzed between 20 and 65 female offspring (queen or worker larvae, pupae, or adults, mean = 33.0, standard deviation [SD] = 17.7, Table 1) from each of the 10 nests at 2 highly polymorphic microsatellite loci, List2001 and List2003 (Daly et al. 2002Go). DNA was extracted using the Chelex method, whereby an antenna from an adult or pupa or the head of a larva was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground up using a plastic pestle, followed by an incubation at 95 °C for 15 min in 200 µL of a 10% Biorad Chelex 100 resin solution. Samples were vortexed and centrifuged before use. Standard polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were carried out for each locus separately in a 15-µL mixture containing 0.5 µM of the forward and reverse primers, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 µL of crude DNA extract, 0.6 units of Silverstar Taq polymerase (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium), and 1x enzyme buffer supplied by the manufacturer. PCR was performed after a touch-down programme, with an initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 20 cycles consisting of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 56 °C, but decreasing 0.5 °C in each step, and 45 s at 72 °C; 10 cycles consisting of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 46 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C; and a final 10-min extension step at 72 °C. After amplification, 1 µL of the PCR product was mixed with 5.8 µL formamide and 0.2 µL Genescan 500 LIZ size standard (Applied Biosystems, Lennik, Belgium), denatured, and loaded onto an ABI-3130 Avant capillary sequencer. Alleles were called using the supplied Gene Mapper software.

Genotypes of the mother queens were determined by direct genotyping (for the 7 nests that were collected in their entirety and the queens were recovered) or were reconstructed from worker offspring genotypes (for the 3 remaining colonies, Table 1). Once the mother queens' genotypes were established, the Matesoft program (Moilanen et al. 2004Go) was used to determine the number of males the queens had mated to (paternity) and to assign individual workers to particular patrilines. Individual patriline assignments were then used to calculate the effective paternity of each colony (Starr 1984Go), Formula where pi is the proportional contribution of the ith male mate. This is the effective number of males the queen mates with, correcting for unequal paternity contribution. The corresponding pedigree worker–worker relatedness was calculated for each colony as r = 1/4+1/2Me (Pamilo 1991Go). Arithmetic mean relatedness and the corresponding harmonic mean paternity were calculated as population summary values. Harmonic mean is used because relatedness and paternity are inversely related to each other (Boomsma and Ratnieks 1996Go).

Two types of errors potentially confound effective paternity estimates: nondetection and nonsampling (Boomsma and Ratnieks 1996Go). The nondetection error is the probability that father males have identical multilocus genotypes and hence cannot be distinguished; nonsampling error is the probability that one or more patrilines are actually present but are not sampled (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo; Nielsen et al. 2003Go). The magnitude of both errors was evaluated using the equations in Foster and Ratnieks (2001a)Go. The inequality in paternity contributions across father males in all colonies was evaluated using the paternity skew index S = (MtMe)/(Mt–1) (Pamilo and Crozier 1996Go), where Mt is the total number of male mates and Me the effective number of mates, for the given worker array. This index rises from 0 to 1 as paternity becomes more unequal. As a result of sampling error, unequal paternity is expected even when the fathers have equal total numbers of offspring (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo). Therefore, the paternity skews for each colony were compared with those expected under equal paternity using a paired t-test. Based on simulated binomial or multinomial distributions, we calculated that equal paternity should result in skews of 0.05–0.14 with the observed number of male mates and female brood analyzed (Table 1).

Behavioral observations of worker reproduction and policing
To carry out policing bioassays, 7 V. germanica colonies were transferred to 15 (width) x 17 (depth) x 40 cm (height) wooden observation boxes maintained outside the Institute for Botany and Microbiology in Leuven. Colonies were allowed to fly freely and forage naturally. Of the 7 nests, 4 successfully reestablished (colonies 17, 18, 20, and 23) and were used to carry out policing assays following a slightly modified version of the protocol of Foster et al. (2002)Go. Each trial involved 3 colonies: a queenright discriminator colony, a queenright colony that acted as a source of queen-laid eggs, and a queenless colony that acted as a source of worker-laid eggs (Table 2). Because the colonies used were small (ca. 200 workers), only 1.6% of the workers had active ovaries, and reproductive workers can only lay around 1 egg per day (see Results), we assumed that most or all of the eggs laid in our queenright source colonies were queen laid. The combs used from the source colonies were emptied a day before the trial so that the eggs used in the trials were approximately 1 day old. The eggs were then collected on a glass plate using flexible forceps, so we could check that the collected eggs were intact. Only the undamaged eggs were used in the trials, damaged eggs were discarded. Subsequently, the queen-laid and worker-laid eggs were glued into an empty test comb using 1% methylcellulose glue in alternating rows of queen-laid and worker-laid eggs. The test comb was the lowest comb of each discriminator colony and consisted of large cells which are used to rear both males and queens; the comb itself was emptied shortly before each experiment and glued onto a thin iron wire attached to a piece of children's modeling clay, allowing the comb to be taken in and out of the colony, thereby enabling us to monitor egg survival. The numbers of queen-laid and worker-laid eggs remaining were checked after 1 h, 1 day, and 2 days. Policing behavior was recorded using a small infrared night vision camera (Conrad Electronic, Oldenzaal, The Netherlands, catalog number 190865) placed at the bottom of each nest box and connected to a computer using an Avermedia EZMaker framegrabber and VirtualDub (http://www.virtualdub.org/) software. This allowed time-lapse digital video recording (5 frames/s) onto the computer hard disk. We did 4 trails with a total of 114 queen-laid eggs and 114 worker-laid eggs (Table 2). Observations were carried out between the 15th and 18th of September 2005.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Proportions of worker-laid and queen-laid eggs policed after 1 h, 1 day, and 2 days in 2 queenright colonies

 
The statistical significance of differences in the policing rate of introduced worker-laid and queen-laid eggs was tested both at the level of each individual trial using Fisher's Exact tests and across all trials using a generalized linear model (GLZ) with binomial error structure and logit link function, in which QUEEN VS. WORKER-LAID and TRIAL were included as factors in the analysis. Because we were limited by the number of healthy colonies we had available, some colonies were used twice in our assays, either as a source of eggs or as a discriminator colony (Table 2). This means that the 4 trials we performed cannot be considered as fully independent.

Egg viability
To exclude the possibility that worker-laid eggs could have a lower intrinsic viability than queen-laid ones (Pirk et al. 2004Go; Nonacs et al. 2006Go), we transferred 50 queen-laid eggs and 138 worker-laid eggs into combs, which we incubated at 25 °C and 68% relative humidity (Table 3). We also incubated combs with nontransferred eggs in their original combs under the same conditions (Table 3). All eggs were approximately 1 day old. Every 24 h, the combs were inspected to count the number of surviving eggs and the number of larvae that had hatched. Hatched larvae were removed, so they would not be counted twice. The combs were monitored for up to 6 days because the development of an egg to a first instar larva takes approximately 5 days (Spradbery 1971Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Survival and hatching of transferred and nontransferred queen-laid and worker-laid eggs

 
Percentage of worker-laid eggs and parentage of adult males
Following the method of Helanterä et al. (2006)Go, we estimated the percentage of worker-laid eggs in natural queenright colonies from the queen and worker fecundities as A = (nW · p · eW)/(nW · p · eW +eQ), where nW is the mean colony size, p the proportion of workers with activated ovaries, and eW and eQ the number of eggs laid by a single worker and by the queen per day. The mean colony size nW of reproductive stage queenright colonies in August/September is 1331 workers (n = 26 colonies, Spradbery 1971Go). The number of eggs laid per day by the queen eQ at the same time is 154 (n = 26 colonies, Spradbery 1971Go). To establish the proportion of workers that had activated ovaries (p) we dissected a total of 1008 workers taken from 5 mature queenright nests. Assuming that the egg-laying rates of workers with active ovaries in queenright and queenless colonies are identical, we determined eW by allowing 11–41 workers from 3 queenless colonies each to lay eggs for 5 days in an empty comb and dissecting them at the end. Ovary active workers were defined as those having ovaries containing oocytes at least half the size of a freshly laid egg (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo). From A, we calculated the proportion of male eggs that were worker laid as B = A/(A +[1–A] · m), where m is the proportion of the queen-laid eggs that are male, which has been estimated at 13.0% (n = 26 colonies, Spradbery 1971Go). Ninety-five percent confidence limits (CLs) on A and B were calculated using a Monte Carlo procedure as described in Helanterä et al. (2006)Go.

To determine the proportion of adult males that were the queen's and the workers' sons, a total of 372 (N) males from 7 queenright colonies (mean = 53, SD = 30.5, Table 1) were genotyped using the same 2 loci used to determine queen mating frequency. Loci are informative only if the paternal and maternal alleles of the workers differ, that is, if a worker's son can be distinguished from a queen's sons when he inherits a paternal allele not present in the queen (Foster et al. 2000Go). The proportion of worker-produced males for each nest was estimated as Nw/(PjNj) where Nj and Nw are the total number of males analyzed for the jth nest and the number of detected worker's sons, respectively, and Pj is the power of detecting a worker's son in the jth nest (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo). The power for detecting workers’ sons was calculated following Foster and Ratnieks (2001a)Go.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Allelic diversity, worker relatedness, and queen mating frequency
Genetic variation at the 2 microsatellite loci studied was very high, with 16 and 11 detected alleles and expected heterozygosities of 0.86 and 0.83 at loci LIST2001 and LIST2003, respectively. The genotypes of the analyzed diploid brood show that all mother queens had mated to multiple males and that most (6/10) had mated with 4 males; the mean number of male mates was 3.5. The harmonic mean effective paternity was only slightly lower, 2.92 (Table 1). The mean paternity skew was 0.16, which was not significantly greater than the expected value (0.09) if all fathers contributed equally (paired t-test, t = 1.27, P = 0.24, Table 1). The observed paternities translate into a mean sister–sister pedigree relatedness of 0.42, which is significantly lower than 0.5 (single-sample t-test, t = –4.72, 1-sided P = 0.0005, Table 1). Hence, workers are significantly more related to the queen's sons (r = 0.25) than to other workers’ sons (r = 0.42/2 = 0.21). Given the observed heterozygosities, the nondetection error was low, 0.02 (cf. Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo), and with an average of 33 diploid brood per colony being genotyped (Table 1), the mean nonsampling probabilities of males with P = 50%, 33%, or 25% paternities were only (1 – P)33 = 1.2 x 10–10, 1.5 x 10–6, and 7.5 x 10–5, respectively, on average. Hence, neither of these errors likely affected our paternity estimates.

Behavioral observations of worker reproduction and policing
Summing across all 4 trials, after 1 h more than half of the introduced worker-laid eggs were policed, whereas 74% of the queen-laid eggs still remained (Table 2). Furthermore, 60 of 114 (53%) queen-laid eggs but only 9 of 114 (8%) worker-laid eggs survived for 1 day (Table 2). After 2 days, none of the worker-laid eggs remained whereas 36 of 114 (32%) of the queen-laid eggs remained (Table 2). These differences in the policing rate of worker-laid and queen-laid eggs after 2 days were highly significant, both when tested for each trial individually (Fisher's Exact test, P between 0.0002 and 0.01, Table 2) and when trial was included as a factor (GLZ, factor QUEEN VS. WORKER-LAID: P = 4 x 10–14). In the latter analysis, the first-order interaction effect TRIAL x QUEEN VERSUS WORKER-LAID was not significant, P = 1, meaning that differences in policing rates between trials were not significant. The low survival of queen-laid eggs after 2 days (32%) was most likely caused by the procedure of transferring eggs because in the viability experiments only 18 out of 50 (36%) of the transferred queen-laid eggs survived for 2 days (Table 3a). The policing of worker-laid eggs occurred irrespective of whether the source and discriminator colonies were originating from the same colonies or whether they came from entirely different colonies (Table 2). This demonstrates that the chemical signal used to differentiate between worker-laid and queen-laid eggs is probably universal, rather than colony specific. Finally, video recordings clearly revealed that it was not the queen but the workers that policed worker-laid eggs. In fact, in 3 of the 4 trials the queen did not even visit the test comb during the first day that the comb was introduced.

Egg viability
There was no difference in the overall hatch rate of transferred or untransferred queen-laid and worker-laid eggs, either when tested on all data pooled together (Fisher's Exact test, P = 0.19 and P = 0.15, respectively) or when tested in a pairwise fashion for the 2 colonies, 17 and 23, for which we had both queenright and queenless colony fragments available (paired t-test, t = 3.0, P = 0.20 and t = 4.0, P = 0.16, respectively) (Table 3). Hence, worker-laid eggs did not have lower viability than queen-laid ones. The overall survival of transferred eggs, however, was lower than that of nontransferred eggs (queen-laid eggs: Fisher's Exact test, P = 6 x 10–13; paired t-test, t = 60.0, P = 0.01; worker-laid eggs: Fisher's Exact test, P = 5 x 10–29; paired t-test, t = 31.00, P = 0.021; Table 3).

Percentage of worker-laid eggs and male parentage
Of 1008 examined workers from 5 colonies (mean = 201.6, SD = 84.0), 16 (1.6%) had activated ovaries of which 3 (0.30%) contained nearly mature oocytes (>90% full-size). These estimates are close to the percentage of workers with active ovaries in queenright colonies of a North American population of V. germanica, 0.6% (Ross 1985Go). Given a mean colony size in August/September of 1331 workers (Spradbery 1971Go), colonies therefore contain an average of 21 egg-laying workers. In 3 queenless colonies, a total of 27 reproductive workers (32% of the dissected workers) laid 178 eggs over a period of 5 days. Hence, the mean number of eggs laid per reproductive worker per day (eW) was 1.32. This leads to an estimated 15.4% (A) and 58.4% (B) of all eggs and male eggs, respectively, being worker-laid in queenright colonies (95% CL on A and B: [8.2%, 25.1%] and [40.7%, 72.2%]).

In contrast to these high estimates of the percentage of eggs that were worker laid, the genotyping results show that only 0.27% (1/372, 95% CL: [0.07%, 0.99%]) of the screened adult males were the workers' sons (Table 1). The average power for detecting workers' sons (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo) was 61%. Taking this into account results in an estimated 0.44% of the adult males being workers' sons (95% CL: [0.11%, 1.61%]). The effective number of assignable males was P x N = 226.7. The clear discrepancy between the high percentage of male eggs that were estimated to be worker laid (58.4%) and the low percentage of adult males that were workers' sons (0.44%) is consistent with the forementioned observations which show that worker-laid eggs are effectively policed.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Our results demonstrate that Belgian populations of V. germanica are characterized by a high effective queen mating frequency, 2.9 (Table 1)—an estimate that is close to that obtained for an Australian population of this species, 2.4 (Goodisman et al. 2002Go). The estimate is also in the range of effective queen mating frequencies observed in other large-colony Vespula, where the effective paternity is either not significantly different from 2 (V. vulgaris, Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo) or significantly higher (3.3 in Vespula squamosa, Ross 1986Go, and 5.2 in Vespula maculifrons, Goodisman et al. 2007Go). The high effective paternity and approximately equal sperm use of the male mates form a nice contrast, however, with results obtained for other vespines such as the hornet Vespa crabro, Dolichovespula, and the small-colony species Vespula rufa, where paternity skews are high and effective queen mating frequencies significantly below 2 (1.1, 1–1.4, and 1.5, respectively, Foster et al. 1999Go, 2001; Wenseleers et al. 2005Go).

Given this high effective paternity, worker–worker relatedness was relatively low, 0.42 and workers were genetically more related to the sons of the queen (brothers, r = 0.25) than to the sons of other workers (full- and half-nephews, r = 0.21). On this basis, it was predicted that workers should police each others' reproduction (Ratnieks 1988Go). Our results confirm this prediction and demonstrate that workers selectively kill worker-laid eggs to favor those laid by the queen (Table 2). In addition, we estimated that 58.4% of the male eggs but only 0.44% of the adult males were the workers' sons, again consistent with worker reproduction being effectively policed. Finally, we demonstrated that the lower survival of workers' sons compared with the queen's sons was not due to a lower intrinsic viability of worker-laid eggs, against the hypothesis of Pirk et al. (2004)Go to explain worker policing in the honeybee. Recently, absence of large viability differences between queen-laid and worker-laid eggs have also been shown in V. vulgaris (Helanterä et al. 2006Go), and experiments have also refuted the hypothesis for the honeybee itself (Beekman and Oldroyd 2005Go). That we found only a very small proportion of the adult males to be the workers' sons means that the anomalous genotypes found in one colony by Goodisman et al. (2002)Go were most likely caused by queen takeover, which is common in vespine wasps (Foster and Ratnieks 2001cGo), and not by worker reproduction. Indeed, this was pointed out as a possibility by Goodisman et al. (2002)Go.

Altogether, our results are important in that they provide an important data point to strengthen the relatedness hypothesis for the evolution of worker policing (Ratnieks 1988Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). Indeed, comparison with the 2 closely related species V. vulgaris and V. rufa shows the power of the hypothesis in predicting reproductive patterns. As in V. germanica, in V. vulgaris paternity is high and workers effectively police worker reproduction so that a high proportion of the male eggs but not the adult males are the workers' sons (Foster and Ratnieks 2001aGo; Helanterä et al. 2006Go). By contrast, in V. rufa, effective paternity is significantly below 2, a significant percentage (11%) of the adult males are the workers' sons, and worker-laid eggs are policed by the queen but not by the workers (Wenseleers et al. 2005Go). In addition, policing is less effective in V. rufa than in V. vulgaris and V. germanica, as expected from the fact that it is more difficult for a single queen to control the whole colony than it is for the workers to control each other (Ratnieks 1988Go; Ratnieks and Reeve 1992Go). A lower policing effectiveness in V. rufa probably also explains why a much higher percentage of the workers attempt to reproduce in that species, 9.2%, as opposed to only 1.6% and 1.0% in V. germanica and V. vulgaris, respectively (Wenseleers et al. 2004aGo; Wenseleers et al. 2004bGo; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006bGo). That is, there is more to gain from laying eggs if relatively more of the workers' eggs escape policing (Wenseleers et al. 2004aGo; Wenseleers et al. 2004bGo).

On the other hand, against the relatedness hypothesis for the evolution of worker policing, it remains true that worker policing has also been observed in species with low queen mating frequency, including the hornet Vespa crabro (Foster et al. 2002Go) and some ants (Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). This demonstrates that worker policing can also be favored if it has other benefits, for example, by increasing colony productivity (Ratnieks 1988Go) or causing a more female-biased sex ratio (the workers' optimum, Foster and Ratnieks 2001bGo) (Hammond and Keller 2004Go; Wenseleers and Ratnieks 2006aGo). Productivity benefits are expected particularly when policing prevents workers from laying eggs via aggression; by contrast, policing via egg eating is more likely to result in sex ratio benefits, as egg eating alone is unlikely to make the colony more productive. Nevertheless, our results are important in that they show that V. germanica forms no exception to the rule that worker reproduction should be effectively policed in a species where queens mate multiple times (Ratnieks 1988Go). Indeed, any exception to this pattern would be a much bigger challenge to the theory than the occurrence of worker policing in species with single mating, which can be readily explained (Ratnieks 1988Go; Foster and Ratnieks 2001bGo).


    FUNDING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
"Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders" (IWT-Vlaanderen) (PhD scholarship to W.B.); Research Foundation Flanders (Postdoctoral Fellowship to T.W.); Research Foundation Flanders (GNM-B5996-KAN2006 1.5.018.0 [EC] 7N to T.W.).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We are grateful to B. Hellemans and M. Larmuseau for their help with the genetic work.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 FUNDING
 REFERENCES
 
Beekman M, Oldroyd BP. Honey bee workers use cues other than egg viability for policing. Biol Lett (2005) 1:129–132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boomsma JJ, Ratnieks FLW. Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (1996) 351:947–975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bourke AFG. Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera. Q Rev Biol (1988) 63:291–311.[CrossRef]

Daly D, Archer ME, Watts PC, Speed MP, Hughes MR, Barker FS, Jones J, Odgaard K, Kemp SJ. Polymorphic microsatellite loci for eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Mol Ecol Notes (2002) 2:273–275.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

D'Ettorre P, Heinze J, Ratnieks FLW. Worker policing by egg-eating in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla inversa. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2004) 271:1427–1434.[Medline]

Dijkstra M, Boomsma JJ. Reproductive self-restraint without effective policing in workers of Acromyrmex echinatior leafcutter ants. In: Integrated Studies of Social Evolution—the Closing Symposium of the EU Research Training Network INSECTS—Baer-Imhoof B, Cremer S, Mathiasen S, Nash DR, Poulsen M, Thomas JM, Boomsma JJ, eds. (2004) Helsingoer (Denmark): Lo-Skolen. 20.

Endler A, Liebig J, Schmitt T, Parker JE, Jones GR, Schreier P, Hölldobler B. Surface hydrocarbons of queen eggs regulate worker reproduction in a social insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2004) 101:2945–2950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Foster KR, Gulliver J, Ratnieks FLW. Worker policing in the European hornet Vespa crabro. Insectes Soc (2002) 49:41–44.[CrossRef]

Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW. Convergent evolution of worker policing by egg eating in the honeybee and common wasp. Proc R Soc Lond B (2001a) 268:169–174.[Medline]

Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW. The effect of sex-allocation biasing on the evolution of worker policing in hymenopteran societies. Am Nat (2001b) 158:615–624.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW. Paternity, reproduction and conflict in vespine wasps: a model system for testing kin selection predictions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2001c) 50:1.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW, Raybould AF. Do hornets have zombie workers? Mol Ecol (2000) 9:735–742.[CrossRef][Medline]

Foster KR, Seppa P, Ratnieks FLW, Thorén PA. Low paternity in the hornet Vespa crabro indicates that multiple mating by queens is derived in vespine wasps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1999) 46:252–257.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Frank SA. Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature (1995) 377:520–522.[CrossRef][Medline]

Frank SA. Repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution (2003) 57:693–705.[Web of Science][Medline]

Gadagkar K. Why do honey bee workers destroy each other's eggs? J Biosci (2004) 29:213–217.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Goodisman MAD, Kovacs JL, Hoffman EA. Lack of conflict during queen production in the social wasp Vespula maculifrons. Mol Ecol (2007) 16:2589–2595.[CrossRef][Medline]

Goodisman MAD, Matthews RW, Crozier RH. Mating and reproduction in the wasp Vespula germanica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2002) 51:497–502.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Halling LA, Oldroyd BP, Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Barron AB, Nanork P, Wongsiri S. Worker policing in the bee Apis florea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2001) 49:509.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I & II. J Theor Biol (1964) 7:1–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hammond RL, Keller L. Conflict over male parentage in social insects. PLoS Biol (2004) 2:1–11.[Medline]

Helanterä H, Tofilski A, Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW. Worker policing in the common wasp Vespula vulgaris is not aimed at improving colony hygiene. Insectes Soc (2006) 53:399–402.[CrossRef]

Keller L. Levels of selection in evolution. (1999) Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. 313.

Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E. The major transitions in evolution. (1995) Oxford: W. H. Freeman.

Moilanen A, Sundström L, Pedersen JS. MATESOFT: a program for deducing parental genotypes and estimating mating system statistics in haplodiploid species. In: Mol Ecol Notes (2004) 4:795–797. Available from: URL http://www.bi.ku.dk/JSPedersen/MateSoft.htm.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve HK. Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol (2003) 12:3157–3164.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nonacs P. Nepotism and brood reliability in the suppression of worker reproduction in the eusocial Hymenoptera. Biol Lett (2006) 2:577–579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nonacs P, Liebert AE, Starks PT. Transactional skew and assured fitness return models fail to predict patterns of cooperation in wasps. Am Nat (2006) 167:467.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Oldroyd BP, Halling LA, Good G, Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Barron AB, Nanork P, Wongsiri S, Ratnieks FLW. Worker policing and worker reproduction in Apis cerana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2001) 50:371–377.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Pamilo P. Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects 1. Sex allocation. Am Nat (1991) 137:83–107.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Pamilo P, Crozier RH. Reproductive skew simplified. Oikos (1996) 75:533–535.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Pirk CWW, Neumann P, Hepburn R, Moritz RFA, Tautz J. Egg viability and worker policing in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2004) 101:8649–8651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Queller DC. Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2000) 355:1647–1655.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ratnieks FLW. Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Am Nat (1988) 132:217–236.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol (2006) 51:581–608.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ratnieks FLW, Reeve HK. Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies: the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species. J Theor Biol (1992) 158:33–65.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK. Worker policing in the honeybee. Nature (1989) 342:796–797.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T. Policing insect societies. Science (2005) 307:54–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T, Forthcoming. Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced? Trends Ecol Evol. (2007).

Ross KG. Aspects of worker reproduction in 4 social wasp species (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Vespidae). J Zool (1985) 205:411–424.[Web of Science]

Ross KG. Kin selection and the problem of sperm utilization in social insects. Nature (1986) 323:798–800.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Spradbery JP. Seasonal changes in the population structure of wasp colonies (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Anim Ecol (1971) 40:501–523.[CrossRef]

Spradbery JP. Wasps: an account of the biology and natural history of solitary and social wasps. (1973) London: Sidgwick and Jackson.

Starr CK. Sperm competition, kinship, and sociality: a review of modern theory. In: Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems—Smith RL, ed. (1984) Orlando (FL): Academic Press. 427–464.

Trivers RL, Hare H. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science (1976) 191:249–263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wenseleers T, Badcock NS, Erven K, Tofilski A, Nascimento FS, Hart AG, Burke TA, Archer ME, Ratnieks FLW. A test of worker policing theory in an advanced eusocial wasp, Vespula rufa. Evolution (2005) 59:1306–1314.[Web of Science][Medline]

Wenseleers T, Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW. When resistance is useless: policing and the evolution of reproductive acquiescence in insect societies. Am Nat (2004a) 164:E154–E167.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Wenseleers T, Helanterä H, Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW. Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis. J Evol Biol (2004b) 17:1035–1047.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW. Comparative analysis of worker reproduction and policing in eusocial Hymenoptera supports relatedness theory. Am Nat (2006a) 168:E163–E179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW. Enforced altruism in insect societies. Nature (2006b) 444:50.[CrossRef][Medline]

Woyciechowski M, Lomnicki A. Multiple mating of queens and the sterility of workers among eusocial Hymenoptera. J Theor Biol (1987) 128:317–327.[CrossRef][Web of Science]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/272    most recent
arm128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonckaert, W.
Right arrow Articles by Wenseleers, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bonckaert, W.
Right arrow Articles by Wenseleers, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?