Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Field, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calbert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Field, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Calbert, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 2: 122-127
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Don't count your eggs before they're parasitized

contest resolution and the trade-offsduring patch defense in a parasitoid wasp

Scott A. Fielda and Greg Calbertb

a Department of Crop Protection, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, South Australia b Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Adelaide, South Australia

Address correspondence to S. A. Field, Department of Entomology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, PO Box 12, Rehovot, 76100, Israel. E-mail: sfield{at}agri.huji.ac.il

Although aggressive conflicts over hosts occur among females in many species of insect parasitoids, few studies have examined the mechanisms by which these contests are resolved. In Trissolcus basalis, a parasitoid of pentatomid bug egg masses, females co-exploiting an egg mass (patch) encounter one another repeatedly and fight for possession of the patch. We investigated the resolution of pairwise contests by experimentally varying the release time of females and the size of the patch. Logistic regression showed that the female arriving first on the patch was more likely to win both the first agonistic encounter and to retain overall possession of the patch. This advantage to the first female suggests a resource-correlated asymmetry in favor of the first female, due to her having invested more offspring in the patch. Although escalations were more common when the asymmetry in arrival times was small, the majority of encounters within all contests were nevertheless resolved without escalated fighting, with the resident attacking and the intruder backing down. Thus contest resolution basically followed a "bourgeois" rule. Residents tolerated intruders more frequently when the patch size was larger and the second female was released later, illustrating the trade-off faced by residents between defending the patch and continuing to exploit it.

Key words: agonistic behavior, asymmetries, bourgeois strategy, egg parasitoid, Trissolcus basalis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.