Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soler, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Soler, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 3: 275-280
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Change in host rejection behavior mediated by the predatory behavior of its brood parasite

Juan José Solera, Gabriele Sorcib, Manuel Solera and Anders Pape Møllerb

a Departamento de Biología Animal y Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain b Laboratoire d'Ecologie, CNRS URA 258, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

Address correspondence to J. J. Soler. E-mail: jsolerc{at}goliat.ugr.es

Passerine hosts of parasitic cuckoos usually vary in their ability to discriminate and reject cuckoo eggs. Costs of discrimination and rejection errors have been invoked to explain the maintenance of this within-population variability. Recently, enforcement of acceptance by parasites has been identified as a rejection cost in the magpie (Pica pica) and its brood parasite, the great spotted cuckoo (Clamator glandarius). Previous experimental work has shown that rejecter magpies suffer from increased nest predation by the great spotted cuckoo. Cuckoo predatory behavior is supposed to confer a selective advantage to the parasite because magpies experiencing a reproductive failure may provide a second opportunity for the cuckoo to parasitize a replacement clutch. This hypothesis implicitly assumes that magpies modulate their propensity to reject parasite eggs as a function of previous experience. We tested this hypothesis in a magpie population breeding in study plots varying in parasitism rate. Magpie pairs that were experimentally parasitized and had their nests depredated, after their rejection behavior had been assessed, changed their behavior from rejection to acceptance. The change in host behavior was prominent in study plots with high levels of parasitism, but not in plots with rare or no cuckoo parasitism. We discuss three possible explanations for these differences, concluding that in study plots with a high density of cuckoos, the probability for a rejecter magpie nest of being revisited and depredated by a cuckoo is high, particularly for replacement clutches, and, therefore, the cost for magpies of rejecting a cuckoo egg in a replacement clutch is increased. Moreover, in areas with high levels of host defense (low parasitism rate), the probability of parasitism and predation of rejecter-magpie nests by the cuckoo is reduced in both first and replacement clutches. Therefore, rejecter magpies in such areas should not change their rejection behavior in replacement clutches.

Key words: brood parasitism, Clamator glandarius, cuckoos, evolution, host defense, magpies, mafia behavior, Pica pica.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
O. Kruger, M. D. Sorenson, and N. B. Davies
Does coevolution promote species richness in parasitic cuckoos?
Proc R Soc B, November 7, 2009; 276(1674): 3871 - 3879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
O. Kruger
Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 29, 2007; 362(1486): 1873 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. P. Hoover and S. K. Robinson
Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host acceptance of parasitic eggs
PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4479 - 4483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. D. Sorenson and R. B. Payne
Molecular Genetic Perspectives on Avian Brood Parasitism
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 388 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. J. Soler, M. Soler, T. Perez-Contreras, S. Aragon, and A. P. Moller
Antagonistic antiparasite defenses: nest defense and egg rejection in the magpie host of the great spotted cuckoo
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 1999; 10(6): 707 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.