Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 4: 391-395
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Intraflock variation in the speed of escape-flight response on attack by an avian predator
Ornithology Group, IBLS, University of Glasgow
Address correspondence to W. Cresswell, who is now at the Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. E-mail: juniper{at}beetle.u-net.com
The benefits of flocking to prey species, whether through collective vigilance, dilution of risk, or predator confusion, depend on flock members responding in a coordinated way to attack. We videotaped sparrowhawks attacking redshank flocks to determine if there were differences in the timing of escape flights between flock members and the factors that might affect any differences. Sparrowhawks are surprise short-chase predators, so variation in the time taken to take flight on attack is likely to be a good index of predation risk. Most birds in a flock flew within 0.25 s of the first bird flying, and all birds were flying within 0.7 s. Redshanks that were vigilant, that were closest to the approaching raptor, and that were close to their neighbors took flight earliest within a flock. Birds in larger flocks took longer, on average, to take flight, measured from the time that the first bird in the flock flew. Most birds took flight immediately after near neighbors took off, but later flying birds were more likely to fly immediately after more distant neighbors took flight. This result, along with the result that increased nearest neighbor distance increased flight delay, suggests that most redshanks flew in response to conspecifics flying. The results strongly suggest that there is significant individual variation in predation risk within flocks so that individuals within a flock will vary in benefits that they gain from flocking.
Key words: Accipiter nisus, collective detection, escape response, flocking, predation risk, reshanks, sparrowhawks, Tringa totanus.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Sansom, J. Lind, and W. Cresswell Individual behavior and survival: the roles of predator avoidance, foraging success, and vigilance Behav. Ecol., August 12, 2009; (2009) arp110v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Pays, M. Goulard, S. P. Blomberg, A. W. Goldizen, E. Sirot, and P. J. Jarman The effect of social facilitation on vigilance in the eastern gray kangaroo, Macropus giganteus Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 469 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Beauchamp and G. D. Ruxton Dilution games: use of protective cover can cause a reduction in vigilance for prey in groups Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1040 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L Quinn and W. Cresswell Testing domains of danger in the selfish herd: sparrowhawks target widely spaced redshanks in flocks Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2006; 273(1600): 2521 - 2526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Martin, J. J. Luque-Larena, and P. Lopez Collective detection in escape responses of temporary groups of Iberian green frogs Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2006; 17(2): 222 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Devereux, M. J. Whittingham, E. Fernandez-Juricic, J. A. Vickery, and J. R. Krebs Predator detection and avoidance by starlings under differing scenarios of predation risk Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2006; 17(2): 303 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. D. Semeniuk and L. M. Dill Cost/benefit analysis of group and solitary resting in the cowtail stingray, Pastinachus sephen Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 417 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Fernandez-Juricic, B. Kerr, P. A. Bednekoff, and D. W. Stephens When are two heads better than one? Visual perception and information transfer affect vigilance coordination in foraging groups Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2004; 15(6): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|