Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfennig, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ziemba, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pfennig, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ziemba, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 4: 436-443
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

A test of alternative hypotheses for kin recognition in cannibalistic tiger salamanders

David W. Pfenniga, James P. Collinsb and Robert E. Ziembab

a Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA b Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA

Address correspondence to D. W. Pfennig, Department of Biology, Coker Hall, CB#3280, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA. E-mail: dpfennig{at}email.unc.edu

The function of kin recognition is controversial. We investigated the adaptive significance of kin discrimination in cannibalistic tiger salamander larvae, Ambystoma tigrinum. Previous laboratory experiments show that cannibals preferentially consume less related individuals. We hypothesized that this example of kin recognition (1) is a laboratory artifact, (2) is a by-product of sibship-specific variation in escape responses, because cannibals from families with rapid responses may be more likely to cannibalize slowly escaping non-kin, (3) is an epiphenomenon of species recognition, (4) functions in disease avoidance, because kin may be more infectious than non-kin, or (5) is favored by kin selection. We evaluated these five hypotheses by using laboratory and field experiments to test specific predictions made by each hypothesis. We rejected hypotheses 1-4 above because (1) kin recognition was expressed in the wild, (2) escape responses did not reliably predict whether a cannibal would ingest kin or non-kin, (3) kin recognition was not most pronounced in populations where tiger salamanders co-occur with other species of salamanders, and (4) non-kin prey were more likely than kin to transmit pathogens to cannibals. However, we established that the necessary condition for kin selection, Hamilton's rule, was met. Thus, our results implicate kin selection as the overriding reason that cannibalistic tiger salamanders discriminate kin.

Key words: Ambystoma tigrinum, cannibalism, disease transmission, Hamilton's rule, kin discrimination, kin selection, salamanders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Segoli, T. Keasar, A. R. Harari, and A. Bouskila
Limited kin discrimination abilities mediate tolerance toward relatives in polyembryonic parasitoid wasps
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1262 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. E. O'Connor and R. Shine
Kin discrimination in the social lizard Egernia saxatilis (Scincidae)
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2006; 17(2): 206 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. J. Stuart and J. M. Herbers
Nest mate recognition in ants with complex colonies: within- and between-population variation
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2000; 11(6): 676 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.