Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dierkes, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dierkes, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, U.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 5: 510-515
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish

Petra Dierkesa, Michael Taborskya and Uwe Kohlerb

a Konrad Lorenz-Institut für Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung (KLIVV), Savoyenstrasse 1A, A-1160 Vienna, Austria b Max-Planck-Institut für Verhaltensphysiologie, D-82319 Seewiesen, Germany

Address correspondence to P. Dierkes. E-mail: p.dierkes{at}klivv.oeaw.ac.at .

Large male helpers in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher gain reproductive success by parasitizing the reproductive effort of male territory owners. Under controlled, experimental conditions we examined the genetic relatedness between the members of brood pairs (n = 14), their male helpers (n = 8), and offspring (n = 292) in seven families. We used multilocus DNA fingerprinting to check for potential reproductive parasitism by male helpers and to assess their fertilization success. Of offspring produced in these families, 10.3% were sired by helpers. In parasitized broods, helper fertilization success varied between 12.5% and 35.8%. Male helpers parasitized parental reproduction when their body size exceeded 4.5 cm standard length (SL), even though sexual maturity may be reached much earlier (3.5 cm SL). Two of three parasitic helpers were punished by severe aggressive attacks when parasitizing the reproduction of breeders, which led to their expulsion from the territory. This study demonstrates a potential fitness benefit to broodcare helpers that is often neglected. It also points to the delicate balance that may exist between cooperative and competitive behavior in cooperatively breeding species.

Key words: Lake Tanganyika, cichlids, cooperative breeding, DNA fingerprinting, Neolamprologus pulcher, N. brichardi, reproductive competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biol LettHome page
J. L Brown, V. Morales, and K. Summers
Tactical reproductive parasitism via larval cannibalism in Peruvian poison frogs
Biol Lett, April 23, 2009; 5(2): 148 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. A. Stiver, J. L. Fitzpatrick, J. K. Desjardins, B. D. Neff, J. S. Quinn, and S. Balshine
The role of genetic relatedness among social mates in a cooperative breeder
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2008; 19(4): 816 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J.L Fitzpatrick, J.K Desjardins, N Milligan, K.A Stiver, R Montgomerie, and S Balshine
Female-mediated causes and consequences of status change in a social fish
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2008; 275(1637): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
B. Taborsky, E. Skubic, and R. Bruintjes
Mothers adjust egg size to helper number in a cooperatively breeding cichlid
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 652 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
B. Egger, B. Obermuller, C. Sturmbauer, H. Phiri, and K. M Sefc
Monogamy in the maternally mouthbrooding Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish Tropheus moorii
Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2006; 273(1595): 1797 - 1803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. Heg, R. Bergmuller, D. Bonfils, O. Otti, Z. Bachar, R. Burri, G. Heckel, and M. Taborsky
Cichlids do not adjust reproductive skew to the availability of independent breeding options
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 419 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J.L. Fitzpatrick, J.K. Desjardins, K.A. Stiver, R. Montgomerie, and S. Balshine
Male reproductive suppression in the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamprologus pulcher
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 25 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
K. A Stiver, P. Dierkes, M. Taborsky, H Lisle Gibbs, and S. Balshine
Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions
Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2005; 272(1572): 1593 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
L. Brouwer, D. Heg, and M. Taborsky
Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 667 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J HeredHome page
M. Taborsky
The Evolution of Bourgeois, Parasitic, and Cooperative Reproductive Behaviors in Fishes
J. Hered., March 1, 2001; 92(2): 100 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.