Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roulin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roulin, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 6: 688-695
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Nonrandom pairing by male barn owls (Tyto alba) with respect to a female plumage trait

Alexandre Roulin

Department of Zoology, University of Bern, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland

Address correspondence to A. Roulin. E-mail: aroulin{at}esh.unibe.ch .

In socially monogamous species it is rare for females to be more intensely colored than males. The barn owl (Tyto alba) is one of the exceptions, as females usually exhibit more and larger black spots on the plumage. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in plumage traits is commonly assumed to be the result of sexual selection. I therefore examined the prediction that male barn owls do not pair randomly with respect to female plumage spottiness during a 5-year study in Switzerland. The prediction was supported, as males that changed mates acquired a new female that was similarly spotted to the previous one, and pairing with respect to plumage spottiness was positively assortative. Significant repeatability in male pairing was presumably neither the consequence of sharing the same habitats with females displaying a given plumage spottiness nor of morphological characteristics of the males that could influence mate sampling. A resemblance in plumage spottiness between the mates of sons and of their father suggests that repeatability could have resulted from sexual imprinting and/or heritable variance in male preference for spotted females. To test whether males assess female plumage spottiness, I either cut off black spots or small pieces of feathers but not the spots of already mated females. Males mated to females with reduced plumage spottiness fed their brood at a lower cadency and achieved a lower reproductive success than other males. This experiment further suggests that female plumage spottiness is a stimulus for males.

Key words: assortative mating, barn owls, male mate choice, phenotypic correlation, repeatability, sexual dimorphism, Tyto alba.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Roulin and R. Altwegg
Breeding rate is associated with pheomelanism in male and with eumelanism in female barn owls
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 563 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. R. Pryke
Fiery red heads: female dominance among head color morphs in the Gouldian finch
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. W. Fawcett and R. A. Johnstone
Mate choice in the face of costly competition
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. M. Jawor, S. U. Linville, S. M. Beall, and R. Breitwisch
Assortative mating by multiple ornaments in northern cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis)
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 515 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Roulin, C. Riols, C. Dijkstra, and A.-L. Ducrest
Female plumage spottiness signals parasite resistance in the barn owl (Tyto alba)
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2001; 12(1): 103 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.