Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Listøen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Slagsvold, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Listøen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Slagsvold, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 1: 40-43
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Risk taking during parental care: a test of the harm-to-offspring hypothesis

Camilla Listøen, Robin Fjeld Karlsen and Tore Slagsvold

Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1050 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

Address correspondence to T. Slagsvold. E-mail: tore.slagsvold{at} bio.uio.no .

Amount of risk taking during parental care is often explained in relation to the reproductive value of the offspring. The "harm-to-offspring hypothesis" focuses on the relative harm a period of no parental care can do to the offspring. According to this hypothesis, parents should take greater risks for offspring in poor condition than for offspring in good condition. We manipulated offspring condition in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) and tested the harm-to-offspring hypothesis by exposing parents to a predator model (a sparrowhawk, Accipiter nisus). Time elapsed until a parent first entered the nest-box was used as a risk-taking measure. Parents spent significantly shorter time until first nest visit for offspring in poor condition than for offspring in good condition. Hence, the harm-to-offspring hypothesis was supported.

Key words: Ficedula hypoleuca, offspring condition, parental care, predation risk, reproductive value.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.