Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuervo, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cuervo, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 3: 246-259
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Sex-limited expression of ornamental feathers in birds

José Javier Cuervoa and Anders Pape Møllerb

a Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Pabellón del Perú, Avenida María Luisa s/n, E-41013 Sevilla, Spain b Laboratoire d'Ecologie, CNRS UMR 7652, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bât. A, 7ème étage, 7 quai St. Bernard, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

Address correspondence to J. J. Cuervo. E-mail: jcuervo{at}eeza.csic.es .

Extravagant secondary sexual characters show sexual size dimorphism in some species but are completely sex limited in others. Sexual ornamentation has been hypothesized to benefit mainly males through sexual selection, but the costs of secondary sexual characters initially would be experienced by both sexes. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism of ornaments and, eventually, the complete sex-limited expression of these characters, will depend on the effects of sexual and natural selection on the two sexes. A phylogenetic analysis controlling for similarities due to common ancestry of 60 independent evolutionary origins of feather ornamentation in birds was used to investigate ecological factors correlated with sexual size dimorphism and sex-limited expression of secondary sexual characters. When the size of an ornament is large relative to body size, the trait will be particularly costly for females, resulting in selection for increased sexual size dimorphism of the ornament. Indeed, sexual size dimorphism of ornaments was positively related to the relative size of male ornaments but was unrelated to relative size of female ornaments. Species with polygynous and lekking mating systems with little or no male parental care (in particular nest building and incubation) demonstrated sex-limited expression of ornaments as compared to monogamous species. Species with no food provisioning of offspring by the male showed a trend for increased sexual size dimorphism of ornaments. Therefore, large natural selection costs during reproduction imposed by the expression of secondary sexual characters are related to the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of ornaments and eventually their complete loss from females.

Key words: sex limitation, sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.