Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 3: 260-264
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Partner fidelity and egg reciprocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema
a Department of Animal and Human Biology, University of Turin, via Accademia Albertina 17, 10123 Torino, Italy b Department of Veterinary Morphophysiology, University of Turin, viale Mattioli 25, 10125 Torino, Italy
Address correspondence to G. Sella. E-mail: sella{at}dm.unito.it .
The mating system of the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema consists of a regular egg exchange between partners of a pair. Such reciprocal egg exchange has been considered a form of cooperation, where one partner cooperates by offering its eggs to be fertilized and expects to receive partner's eggs to fertilize. Frequency of cases in which hermaphrodites cheated (i.e., failed to give up eggs at their turn) and responses to cheating were estimated by analyzing the behavior of 38 triplets of ovigerous hermaphrodites over a 2-week period. The partner did not reciprocate 8% of egg layings. The cheated partner did not detect most cases of cheating (16 out of 25). Such a low frequency of cheating can explain why no retaliation mechanism evolved in this species. Sixty-eight percent of the individuals from the original pairs deserted even if their partners never cheated them; therefore, cheating cannot be considered the cause of desertion. Rather, desertion appeared to be a consequence of availability of a new partner whose oocytes were riper than those of the old partner. It occurred because the opportunity arose for an immediate reward, indicating that O. diadema egg exchange differs from that originally described in some serranid fish as egg trading. The relationship between costs of desertion and population size is discussed.
Key words: cheating, cooperation, desertion, egg reciprocation, Ophryotrocha diadema, Polychaeta, simultaneous hermaphroditism.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. W. Petersen Sexual selection and reproductive success in hermaphroditic seabasses Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 439 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Lorenzi, D. Schleicherova, and G. Sella Life history and sex allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worm Ophryotrocha diadema: the role of sperm competition Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 381 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. D. Bishop and A. J. Pemberton The third way: spermcast mating in sessile marine invertebrates Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 398 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Schleicherova, M. C. Lorenzi, and G. Sella How outcrossing hermaphrodites sense the presence of conspecifics and suppress female allocation Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 1 - 5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Leonard Bateman's Principle and Simultaneous Hermaphrodites: A Paradox Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 856 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Luscher and C. Wedekind Size-dependent discrimination of mating partners in the simultaneous hermaphroditic cestode Schistocephalus solidus Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2002; 13(2): 254 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. K. Michiels, A. Hohner, and I. C. Vorndran Precopulatory mate assessment in relation to body size in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris: avoidance of dangerous liaisons? Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2001; 12(5): 612 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|