Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 6: 591-596
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Contest behavior in territorial male butterflies: does size matter?

Darrell J. Kemp

School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns 4870, Queensland, Australia

Address correspondence to D. Kemp. E-mail: darrell.kemp{at}jcu.edu.au .

Although intrasexual contests generally favor bigger or stronger individuals, the relevance of body size to war of attrition-type disputes between weaponless animals such as butterflies is unclear. In this study I aimed to investigate the significance of size in this context by studying territorial contests in Hypolimnas bolina (L.), a species that exhibits consistent seasonal plasticity in body size. In this species adult age is positively correlated with large size in spring but with small size in autumn. This shift allowed independent evaluation of the relevance of each variable (size and age) to intrasexual contest success. Observation of a population of marked individuals indicated that only age appeared important, with the winners of pair-wise contests significantly older than losers in both seasons, and with contests lasting longer when the age difference between the combatants was small. Age was also linked to residency; residents won 99% of all contests. This study suggests that size does not matter in these aerial disputes, but age and residency do. It is not yet possible to determine whether older butterflies are intrinsically better competitors, or whether they simply have greater opportunity to find a vacant territory.

Key words: aggression, war of attrition, nymphalid, Lepidoptera.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. J. Fuxjager and C. A. Marler
How and why the winner effect forms: influences of contest environment and species differences
Behav. Ecol., November 13, 2009; (2009) arp148v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. R. Foote, L. P. Fitzsimmons, D. J. Mennill, and L. M. Ratcliffe
Male chickadees match neighbors interactively at dawn: support for the social dynamics hypothesis
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1192 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
K. Fischer, J. Perlick, and T. Galetz
Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better
Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2008; 275(1642): 1517 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Bergman, K. Gotthard, D. Berger, M. Olofsson, D. J Kemp, and C. Wiklund
Mating success of resident versus non-resident males in a territorial butterfly
Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2007; 274(1618): 1659 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. J. Kemp
Butterfly contests and flight physiology: why do older males fight harder?
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 456 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.