Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barta, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Giraldeau, L.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Barta, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Giraldeau, L.-A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 2: 121-127
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Breeding colonies as information centers: a reappraisal of information-based hypotheses using the producer—scrounger game

Zoltán Bartaa and Luc-Alain Giraldeaub

a Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen (formerly Kossuth University), Debrecen, H-4010, Hungary b Department of Biology, Concordia University, 1455 ouest Boulevard de Maisonneuve, Montréal, Quebec H3G 1M8 Canada

Address correspondence to Z. Barta, who is now at the Centre for Behavioural Biology, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. E-mail: z.barta{at}bristol.ac.uk . L.-A. Giraldeau is now at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Québec at Montréal.

One of the most cited hypotheses for the evolutionary advantages of colonial breeding proposes that colonies serve as a place of information exchange about the location of food—the information center hypothesis. Despite its popularity, the hypothesis generated considerable controversy over its predictions and role in the evolution of colonial breeding. As a consequence, the hypothesis still lingers on, despite numerous apparent falsifications from both observational and experimental approaches. The controversy has three roots: the unclear causal direction between coloniality and information center, the unrecognized distinction between colonial breeding and colonial roosting, and the use of an implicit group selectionist argument. Here we try to clarify this controversy by applying an entirely individual selection-based approach, the producer-scrounger game, to the information center hypothesis. Furthermore, we show how other information-based alternatives of the original information center hypothesis (e.g., local enhancement and recruitment center hypotheses) can be included in a common framework. Our model predicts that individuals relying on information transfer at the colony should be rather common in nature. This prediction is essentially unaltered by the inclusion of either local enhancement or recruitment center. On the other hand, the frequency of leading unknowledgeable individuals (the most accepted sign of information center) is expected to be very low. The model indicates that tests of information-based hypotheses should focus on the expected relative frequency of food-searching flights rather than the frequency of leading.

Key words: information center, local enhancement, producer-scrounger games, recruitment center.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
J. Williams and E. Taylor
The evolution of hyperactivity, impulsivity and cognitive diversity
J R Soc Interface, June 22, 2006; 3(8): 399 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. R. X. Dall
Can information sharing explain recruitment to food from communal roosts?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 42 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.