Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 2: 134-139
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Non-warning odors trigger innate color aversionsas long as they are novel
Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, OX1 3PS, Oxford, UK
Address correspondence to W. Jetz. E-mail: walter.jetz@zoo.ox.ac.uk. C. Rowe is now at Department of Psychology, Ridley Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Warning signals made by unpalatable insects to potential predators commonly target more than one sense: such signals are "multimodal." Pyrazines are odors produced by warningly colored insects when attacked, and have been shown to interact with food coloration, biasing avian predators against novel and typically aposematic food. However, at present it is not known whether this is an adaptation by prey to exploit a general feature of avian psychology, or an evolutionary response by birds to enhance their avoidance of unpalatable prey. Here we investigate the effect of other odors on the innate responses of naive domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) to food that is of novel color, or of a color that is associated with warning coloration, yellow. In the first experiment, we demonstrate that natural and artificial odors that have no association with aposematism in the wild can produce biases against both novel colored foods and yellow colored foods. In a second experiment, we also show that odor novelty is vital for eliciting such effects. These results support the idea that warning odors have evolved in response to preexisting psychological biases against novel odors in predators, rather than predators evolving specific responses against odors associated with unpalatable prey.
Key words: antipredator, aposematism, foraging, innate aversions, multimodal signals, neophobia, signal design.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Aronsson and G. Gamberale-Stille Importance of internal pattern contrast and contrast against the background in aposematic signals Behav. Ecol., November 2, 2009; (2009) arp141v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Hunter Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1315 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Halpin, J. Skelhorn, and C. Rowe Being conspicuous and defended: selective benefits for the individual Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1012 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. VanderSal and E. A. Hebets Cross-modal effects on learning: a seismic stimulus improves color discrimination learning in a jumping spider J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3689 - 3695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Exnerova, P. Stys, E. Fucikova, S. Vesela, K. Svadova, M. Prokopova, V. Jarosik, R. Fuchs, and E. Landova Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate? Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 148 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hauglund, S. B. Hagen, and H. M. Lampe Responses of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) to multimodal aposematic signals Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 392 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

