Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebensperger, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cofré, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ebensperger, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cofré, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 2: 227-236
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

On the evolution of group-living in the New World cursorial hystricognath rodents

Luis A. Ebensperger and Hernán Cofré

Departamento de Ecología, P. Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Address correspondence to L.A. Ebensperger. E-mail: lebenspe{at}genes.bio.puc.cl .

We used the comparative method to examine the evolutionary causes of group-living in the New World cursorial hystricognath rodents. To do so, we used the available literature to collect information on behavioral (group size, burrow digging), ecological (amount of plant cover in the habitat), and life history (body mass, time to sexual maturity) variables, along with phylogenetic relationships of these rodents. We analyzed these variables in the context of three major hypotheses. A first explanation poses that rodents live in groups to reduce the energy needed in the construction of their burrows. A second hypothesis suggests that grouped rodents increase their ability to detect and escape from predators. A third possibility states that group-living is adopted by rodents to provide extra parental care to their offspring. Our comparative analysis revealed that across species variation of group size is, to some extent, influenced by body size, and by the habit of burrow digging. Thus, large sized rodent species that actively dig their own burrows form larger group sizes than small sized species that do not dig burrows. In contrast, across species variation of group size was not influenced by differences in the amount of plant cover in the habitat (an indirect measure of predatory risk), or by differences in the time to first reproduction (a measure of parental care given). Therefore, group-living among the New World histricognath rodents seems more linked to a strategy aimed to reduce their burrowing cost than to a strategy aimed to reduce their predatory risk, or to extend their parental investment.

Key words: burrows, comparative analysis, parental care, predatory risk, rodent sociality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
L. A. Ebensperger and D. T. Blumstein
Sociality in New World hystricognath rodents is linked to predators and burrow digging
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 410 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. A. Randall, K. Rogovin, P. G. Parker, and J. A. Eimes
Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 961 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.