Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Candolin, U.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Candolin, U.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 4: 407-411
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Sexual signaling in the European bitterling: females learn the truth by direct inspection of the resource

Ulrika Candolin and John D. Reynolds

School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK

Address correspondence to U. Candolin, who is now at Department of Zoology, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland. E-mail: ulrika.candolin{at}esh.unibe.ch .

In many taxa females appear to base their mate choice on multiple traits. But the relative importance of different traits in mate choice has rarely been determined. Here we show that females of a freshwater fish, the European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus, base their mate choice on multiple traits that differ in their reliability as indicators of expected reproductive success and are used at different stages of the decision process. The initial decision to inspect a male is based on male behavior and red coloration, whereas the final spawning decision is based on the quality of the live unionid mussel, Anodonta anatina, that the male is defending as an oviposition site. Male traits may indicate which males are worth inspecting by reflecting male quality, such as reproductive condition and genetic constitution. Male traits do not, however, reflect mussel quality, as bright males also court females vigorously toward mussels that yield a low probability of survival of the offspring. Females, on the other hand, are choosier than males in their choice of spawning site and seem to gain reliable information about the survival probability of the eggs by inspecting the mussel directly.

Key words: bitterlings, mate choice, multiple ornaments, reliable signaling, resource quality, Rhodeus sericeus, sexual selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. K. Lehtonen and B. B.M. Wong
Should females prefer males with elaborate nests?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1015 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
T. K. Lehtonen, S. Rintakoski, and K. Lindstrom
Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 696 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
O. Svensson and C. Kvarnemo
The importance of sperm competition risk and nest appearance for male behavior and female choice in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 1042 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. J. Murphy
Context-dependent reproductive site choice in a Neotropical frog
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2003; 14(5): 626 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.