Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veech, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Veech, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 4: 467-474
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

The foraging behavior of granivorous rodents and short-term apparent competition among seeds

Joseph A. Veech

Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology Program, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA

Address correspondence to J.A. Veech, who is now at the Department of Zoology, Pearson Hall Room 212, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056-1400. E-mail: veechja{at}muohio.edu .

The foraging behavior of a predator species is thought to be the cause of short-term apparent competition among those prey species that share the predator. Short-term apparent competition is the negative indirect effect that one prey species has on another prey species via its effects on predator foraging behavior. In theory, the density-dependent foraging behavior of granivorous rodents and their preference for certain seeds are capable of inducing short-term apparent competition among seed species. In this study, I examined the foraging behavior of two heteromyid rodent species (family Heteromyidae), Merriam's kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami) and little pocket mice (Perognathus longimembris). In one experiment I tested the preferences of both rodent species for the seeds of eight plant species. Both rodent species exhibited distinct but variable preferences for some seeds and avoidance of others. However, the differences in preference appeared to have only an occasional effect on the strength of the short-term apparent competition detected in a field experiment. In another experiment, I found that captive individuals of both rodent species had approximately equal foraging effort (i.e., time spent foraging) in patches that contained a highly preferred seed type (Oryzopsis hymenoides) regardless of seed density and the presence of a less preferred seed type (Astragalus cicer) in the patches. The rodents also harvested a large proportion of O. hymenoides seeds regardless of initial seed density; this precluded a negative indirect effect of A. cicer on O. hymenoides. But there was a negative indirect effect of O. hymenoides on A. cicer caused by rodents having a lower foraging effort in patches that only contained A. cicer seeds than in patches that contained A. cicer and O. hymenoides seeds. The indirect interaction between O. hymenoides and A. cicer thus represented a case of short-term apparent competition that was non-reciprocal. Most importantly, it was caused by the foraging behavior of the rodents.

Key words: density dependence, foraging behavior, heteromyid rodent, kangaroo rat, seed preference, short-term apparent competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. M. Fedriani and A. J. Manzaneda
Pre- and postdispersal seed predation by rodents: balance of food and safety
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 1018 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.