Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 6: 674-680
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
No effect of parental quality or extrapair paternity on brood sex ratio in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus)
a Division of Biological Sciences, Institute of Environmental and Natural Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK b Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK c Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, S 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Address correspondence to I.R. Hartley. E-mail: i.hartley{at}lancaster.ac.uk . I.R.K. Stewart is now at the T.H. Morgan School of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA. S.C. Griffith is now at the Department of Zoology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Sex allocation theory predicts that parents should manipulate brood sex ratio in order to maximise the combined reproductive value of their progeny. Females mating with high quality males should, therefore, be expected to produce brood sex ratios biased towards sons, as male offspring would receive a relatively greater advantage from inheritance of their father's characteristics than would their female siblings. Furthermore, it has been suggested that sex allocation in chicks fathered through extrapair fertilizations should also be biased towards sons. Contrary to these predictions, we found no evidence that the distribution of sex ratios in a sample of 1483 chicks from 154 broods of blue tits (Parus caeruleus) deviated significantly from that of a binomial distribution around an even sex ratio. In addition, we found no significant effect on brood sex ratio of the individual quality of either parent as indicated by their biometrics, feather mite loads, time of breeding, or parental survival. This suggests that females in our population were either unable to manipulate offspring sex allocation or did not do so because selection pressures were not strong enough to produce a significant shift away from random sex allocation. The paternity of 986 chicks from 103 broods was determined using DNA microsatellite typing. Extrapair males sired 115 chicks (11.7%) from 41 broods (39.8%). There was no significant effect of paternity (within-pair versus extrapair) on the sex of individual offspring. We suggest that, in addition to the weakness of selection pressures, the possible mechanisms responsible for the allocation of sex may not be sufficiently accurate to control offspring sex at the level of the individual egg.
Key words: Blue tit, DNA microsatellite typing, extrapair paternity, parental quality, Parus caeruleus, sex ratio.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. E. Delmore, O. Kleven, T. Laskemoen, S. A. Crowe, J. T. Lifjeld, and R. J. Robertson Sex allocation and parental quality in tree swallows Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1243 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Dickens and I. R. Hartley Differences in parental food allocation rules: evidence for sexual conflict in the blue tit? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 674 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Korsten, C. M. Lessells, A. C. Mateman, M. van der Velde, and J. Komdeur Primary sex ratio adjustment to experimentally reduced male UV attractiveness in blue tits Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 539 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Dreiss, M. Richard, F. Moyen, J. White, A.P. Moller, and E. Danchin Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. E. Johannessen, T. Slagsvold, B. T. Hansen, and J. T. Lifjeld Manipulation of male quality in wild tits: effects on paternity loss Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 747 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.N. Rutstein, H.E. Gorman, K.E. Arnold, L. Gilbert, K.J. Orr, A. Adam, R. Nager, and J.A. Graves Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in the zebra finch Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 763 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E. Budden and S. R. Beissinger Against the odds? Nestling sex ratio variation in green-rumped parrotlets Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 607 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Z. Garamszegi and A. P. Moller Extrapair paternity and the evolution of bird song Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 508 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Spottiswoode and A. P. Moller Extrapair paternity, migration, and breeding synchrony in birds Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 41 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. R. Oddie and C. Reim Egg sex ratio and paternal traits: using within-individual comparisons Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 503 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|