Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blundell, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowyer, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blundell, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bowyer, R. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 1: 134-141
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Sociality in river otters: cooperative foraging or reproductive strategies?

Gail M. Blundella, Merav Ben-Davidb and R. Terry Bowyera

a Institute of Arctic Biology, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit and Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA b Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA

Address correspondence to G.M. Blundell, Institute of Arctic Biology, 311 Irving I Building, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7000, USA. E-mail: ftgmb{at}uaf.edu .

We evaluated factors influencing social organization in coastal river otters (Lontra canadensis) to test two hypotheses: group formation is an antipredation strategy, or, alternatively, group information is related to cooperative foraging. Data on group size, group composition, and sociality were obtained through radiotracking 55 otters in Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA, from 1996 through 1998. For males, larger groups occurred after the mating season and concurrent with availability of schooling pelagic fishes. Stable isotope analysis revealed that otters social in >10% of their locations had diets significantly higher in rapidly swimming pelagic fishes than did less social otters, regardless of gender. In addition, otters that were more social had significantly smaller home ranges than did less social otters, an observation consistent with increased foraging efficiency through cooperative foraging. Discounting associations of females with young of the year, approximately 47% of females and only 24% of males were asocial. Among social otters, males were social in 46% of their locations and 63% of that time occurred in all-male groups. Females were only social in 26% of locations and were in mixed-sex groups 78% of that time. We hypothesize that the time-consuming task of raising offspring prevents females from joining foraging groups. When not raising young, females may join males to cooperatively forage for better-quality prey (pelagic fishes), which would be more difficult to acquire as a solitary forager.

Key words: Alaska, Lontra canadensis, predation risk, river otters, schooling pelagic fishes, sexual dietary partitioning, sexual dimorphism, social organization, stable isotopes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
J. K. Gaydos, P. A. Conrad, K. V. K. Gilardi, G. M. Blundell, and M. Ben-David
Does Human Proximity Affect Antibody Prevalence in Marine-Foraging River Otters (Lontra canadensis)?
J. Wildl. Dis., January 1, 2007; 43(1): 116 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. M. Blundell, M. Ben-David, P. Groves, R. T. Bowyer, and E. Geffen
Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 705 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.