Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courchamp, F.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Courchamp, F.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 1: 20-27
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Small pack size imposes a trade-off between hunting and pup-guarding in the painted hunting dog Lycaon pictus

Franck Courchampa, Gregory S. A. Rasmussenb,c and David W. Macdonaldb

a Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK b Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK c Painted Hunting Dog Research Project, Natural History Museum, PO Box 240, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe

Address correspondence to F. Courchamp, who is now at Ecologie, Systématique & Evolution, Université Paris-Sud XI, Bâtiment 362, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France. E-mail: franck.courchamp{at}epc.u-psud.fr .

The painted hunting dog or African wild dog, Lycaon pictus, is one of the most endangered large carnivores in Africa, with extinction predicted within a few decades if their dramatic decline is not stopped. It has recently been hypothesized that because of their constraining need for helpers, group size was of major importance in obligate cooperative breeding species, and that the resulting likely existence of a threshold number of adults could create an Allee effect, increasing the group extinction risk. One example where the importance for a critical number of adults may have major repercussions for painted hunting dogs concerns baby-sitting, or pup-guarding, a behavior typical of obligate cooperative breeders. We propose that, as forgoing this behavior is costly because pup guards have the potential to decrease pup mortality, its use is costly too, especially in small packs, because helpers are strongly needed for their cooperative foraging (hunting, protecting the kill and bringing back food to the pups). We present a simple model showing how pup-guarding imposes a cost because it implies that less food per hunt is brought back to more individuals at the den. We complete these analyses with empirical tests of the effect of pack size on the probability of pup-guarding, from field data from the Hwange population in Zimbabwe. Our model, as well as our 5 years of empirical data, both suggest a critical threshold at a size of about five individuals.

Key words: African wild dog conservation, Allee effect, cooperative hunting, inverse density dependence, Lycaon pictus, painted hunting dog, pup-guarding.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
L. Conradt and C. List
Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey
Phil Trans R Soc B, March 27, 2009; 364(1518): 719 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
N.J Raihani and A.R Ridley
Variable fledging age according to group size: trade-offs in a cooperatively breeding bird
Biol Lett, December 22, 2007; 3(6): 624 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Ridley and N. Raihani
Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 324 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.