Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dejean, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gibernau, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dejean, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gibernau, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 2: 154-159
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Specialized predation on plataspid heteropterans in a coccinellid beetle: adaptive behavior and responses of prey attended or not by ants

A. Dejeana, J. Orivelb and M. Gibernaua

a Laboratoire d'Ecologie Terrestre (UMR CNRS no. 5552), Université Toulouse III, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France b Laboratoire d'Ethologie et cognition animale (FRE CNRS no. 2382), Université Toulouse III, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France

Address correspondence to A. Dejean. E-mail: dejean{at}cict.fr .

Two plataspid hemipteran species proliferated on Bridelia micrantha (Euphorbiaceae). Colonies of Libyaspis sp., never attended by ants, developed on branches, while Caternaultiella rugosa lived at the base of the trunks, mostly in association with Camponotus brutus that attends them in carton shelters. Both plataspid species are prey of the coccinellid beetle Anisolemnia tetrasticta, whose larvae always detected them by contact. When attacked the Libyaspis nymphs cowered, so that the hypertrophied lateral sides of their tergits made contact with the substrate, but the ladybirds slid their long forelegs under these nymphs, lifted them, and bit them on the ventral face. The Caternaultiella nymphs, which do not have hypertrophied extremities of the tergits, tried to escape at contact with the ladybirds, but were rarely successful. To capture them, the ladybirds either adopted the previous behavior or directly grasped then bit them. We noted a graded aggressiveness in the ants toward the ladybirds according to the situation: no aggressiveness on the tree branches; stopping the ladybirds that approached the shelters where the ants attended Caternaultiella; and full attack of ladybirds that tried to capture Caternaultiella nymphs situated outside shelters. The latter behavior can emit an alarm pheromone that triggers the dispersion of their congeners while attracting attending C. brutus workers. Naive workers are not attracted, so we deduce that this behavior is the result of a kind of learning.

Key words: anti-predator behavior, ants, Heteroptera, Coccinellidae, ladybird beetles, learning, predation, trophobiosis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.