Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kokko, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kokko, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 291-300
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: when should helpers pay to stay?

Hanna Kokkoa,b, Rufus A. Johnstonea and J. Wrightc

a Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK b Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK c School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK

Address correspondence to H. Kokko, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. E-mail: h.kokko{at}bio.gla.ac.uk .

We used a reproductive skew framework to consider the evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups. The model provides the first theoretical treatment of rent payment (the "pay-to-stay" hypothesis) for the evolution of helping behavior of subordinates. According to this hypothesis, not all helping behavior is kin selected, but group members help in order to be allowed to stay in the group and potentially gain breeding positions later in life. We show that reproductive concessions may be replaced by complete skew and voluntary, costly alloparental effort by subordinates once future prospects are included in fitness calculations. This suggests that incomplete skew observed in long-lived species is not due to dominant control over reproduction. Rent payment is predicted to occur when relatedness between subordinate and dominant is low, survival is high, ecological constraints are at least moderately tight, and retaining nonhelping subordinates harms the dominant's fitness. Rent may also be required from related subordinates if helping is very costly (leading to low voluntary helping effort) and ecological constraints are moderately tight. However, related subordinates do not need to have a positive net effect on the dominant's direct fitness to be accepted as group members. We also consider compensatory responses of dominant group members as a potential threat to the stability of renting behavior. If dominants trade off parental effort against their own survival, they may selfishly reduce their own parental effort as a response to increased help. As this improves their own survival, the prospects of territorial inheritance diminish for the subordinate, and subordinates should hence be less willing to accept the rent agreement. However, we show that compensatory responses by "lazy" parents prevent group formation only in borderline cases.

Key words: alloparental care, cooperative breeding, helping at the nest, reproductive skew.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. M. Johns, K. J. Howard, N. L. Breisch, A. Rivera, and B. L. Thorne
Nonrelatives inherit colony resources in a primitive termite
PNAS, October 13, 2009; 106(41): 17452 - 17456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. G. McDonald, A. J.N. Kazem, M. F. Clarke, and J. Wright
Helping as a signal: does removal of potential audiences alter helper behavior in the bell miner?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1047 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. L. Pacheco, P. G. McDonald, J. Wright, A. J.N. Kazem, and M. F. Clarke
Helper contributions to antiparasite behavior in the cooperatively breeding bell miner
Behav. Ecol., February 7, 2008; (2008) arm163v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. F. Russell, N. E. Langmore, A. Cockburn, L. B. Astheimer, and R. M. Kilner
Reduced Egg Investment Can Conceal Helper Effects in Cooperatively Breeding Birds
Science, August 17, 2007; 317(5840): 941 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Y.L Wong, P. M Buston, P. L Munday, and G. P Jones
The threat of punishment enforces peaceful cooperation and stabilizes queues in a coral-reef fish
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2007; 274(1613): 1093 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. K. Reeve and S.-F. Shen
A missing model in reproductive skew theory: The bordered tug-of-war
PNAS, May 30, 2006; 103(22): 8430 - 8434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. G. Zink and H. K. Reeve
Predicting the temporal dynamics of reproductive skew and group membership in communal breeders
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 880 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
K. A Stiver, P. Dierkes, M. Taborsky, H Lisle Gibbs, and S. Balshine
Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions
Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2005; 272(1572): 1593 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. Brouwer, D. Heg, and M. Taborsky
Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 667 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. S. Griffin and S. A. West
Kin Discrimination and the Benefit of Helping in Cooperatively Breeding Vertebrates
Science, October 24, 2003; 302(5645): 634 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. S. Griffin, J. M. Pemberton, P. N. M. Brotherton, G. McIlrath, D. Gaynor, R. Kansky, J. O'Riain, and T. H. Clutton-Brock
A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta)
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 472 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.