Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juliano, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gravel, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Juliano, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gravel, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 301-311
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Predation and the evolution of prey behavior: an experiment with tree hole mosquitoes

Steven A. Juliano and Marc E. Gravel

Behavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Section, Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

Address correspondence to S.A. Juliano. E-mail: sajulia{at}mail.bio.ilstu.edu . M.E. Gravel is now at the Ocean Sciences Centre, Memorial University, St. Johns, NF A1C 5S7, Canada.

We tested for facultative changes in behavior of an aquatic insect in response to cues from predation and for evolution of prey behavior in response to experimental predation regimes. Larvae of the tree hole mosquito Aedes triseriatus reduced filtering, browsing, and time below the surface in response to water that had held a feeding larva of the predator Toxorhynchites rutilus. We subjected experimental A. triseriatus populations to culling of 50% of the larval population, either by T. rutilus predation or by random removal. After two generations of laboratory culling, behavior of the two treatment groups diverged. Aedes triseriatus in control-culled lines retained their facultative shift from filtering to resting, but tended to lose the response of reduced browsing below the surface in water that had held a feeding predator. Predator-culled lines lost their facultative response of reduced filtering in water that had held a feeding predator and evolved toward more time resting and less time filtering in both water that had held a feeding predator and water that had held only A. triseriatus. Predator-culled lines retained their facultative response of reduced browsing below the surface in water that had held a feeding predator. Two field populations and their reciprocal hybrids responded similarly to cues from predation and did not differ in their evolutionary response to experimental culling. We conclude that consistent presence or absence of predation can select rapidly for divergence in prey behavior, including facultative behavioral responses to predators.

Key words: activity, Aedes triseriatus, behavioral responses, constitutive behavior, facultative antipredator behavior, feeding behavior, predation, predator avoidance behavior, Toxorhynchites rutilus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. V. Orr, K. Hittel, and K. Lukowiak
`Different strokes for different folks': geographically isolated strains of Lymnaea stagnalis only respond to sympatric predators and have different memory forming capabilities
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2009; 212(14): 2237 - 2247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Ridley and N. Raihani
Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 324 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. C. Fuller, C. F. Baer, and J. Travis
How and When Selection Experiments Might Actually be Useful
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 391 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.