Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renison, D.
Right arrow Articles by Martella, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Renison, D.
Right arrow Articles by Martella, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 4: 462-466
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Winning and losing: causes for variability in outcome of fights in male Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus)

Daniel Renisona, Dee Boersmab and Mónica B. Martellaa

a Centro de Zoología Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, C.C. 122, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina b Department of Zoology, Box 351800, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98185, USA

Address correspondence to D. Renison. E-mail: drenison{at}com.uncor.edu .

Game theory models predict that fighting ability should be more important in contest outcome when the payoffs of winning are high for both contestants, and ownership should be more important when payoffs are low. Male Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) provide an opportunity to test these predictions in a natural setting because payoffs of winning are higher for penguins fighting before egg laying and lower for penguins fighting after egg laying, allowing the prediction of differences in who should win and lose. We watched an area of approximately 2000 Magellanic penguin nests from 1992 to 1996 at Punta Tombo breeding colony, Argentina; we quantified fighting behavior, banded contestants, measured their body size (here used as an index of fighting ability), determined ownership status when possible, and monitored their reproductive success. We determined that male Magellanic penguins fought for nests and mates. As theory predicts, before egg laying, body size difference was more important than ownership as a predictor of contest outcome and fight duration. After egg laying, owners won fights, and size did not predict who won or how long they fought. Our comparisons of nest ownership, nest quality, and chicks fledged by winners and losers suggested that our predictions on the change in benefits of winning before and after egg laying were correct. We conclude that game theory models are useful in predicting who won or lost fights in male Magellanic penguins and that ultimate benefits of winning fights are related to fitness.

Key words: aggression, fight outcome, fighting, game theory, penguins, Spheniscus magellanicus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
E. S.A. Santos, R. Maia, and R. H. Macedo
Condition-dependent resource value affects male-male competition in the blue-black grassquit
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 553 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Lindstrom and C. Pampoulie
Effects of resource holding potential and resource value on tenure at nest sites in sand gobies
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 70 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. T. Hansen and T. Slagsvold
Early learning affects social dominance: interspecifically cross-fostered tits become subdominant
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.