Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolluru, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kolluru, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 5: 607-614
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Reduced reproductive effort in male field crickets infested with parasitoid fly larvae

Gita R. Kolluru, Marlene Zuk and Mark A. Chappell

Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA

Address correspondence to G.R. Kolluru, who is now at the Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology and Evolution, University of California-Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA. E-mail: gkolluru{at}obee.ucla.edu.

Some populations of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus are parasitized by the phonotactic fly Ormia ochracea. Flies locate crickets by their song and deposit larvae onto them. The larvae develop inside the cricket for 1 week before killing the host upon emergence. The reproductive compensation hypothesis predicts that parasitized crickets should increase their reproductive effort during the initial stages of infestation to offset the loss of fitness resulting from their shortened life span. An alternative hypothesis predicts that parasitized crickets will decrease reproduction, either because they are unable to reproduce or because selection acting on the parasitoid favors decreased host reproduction. In laboratory experiments, parasitized male crickets had reduced reproductive effort (spermatophore production, calling, mating activity, and mass allocated to reproductive tissue) compared to unparasitized males. Parasitized males fed ad libitum showed no evidence of allocating a greater proportion of their resources to reproduction. Parasitized and healthy males did not differ significantly in resting or maximal metabolic rates, although this may have been due to the substantial contribution of larval respiration to the metabolic rate of the host—parasitoid complex. These results are consistent with previous studies and suggest that T. oceanicus males parasitized by O. ochracea do not increase their reproductive effort. We discuss potential reasons that crickets do not increase reproductive effort in response to fly larvae and address difficulties in demonstrating altered life-history patterns in response to parasitism.

Key words: crickets, mating, phonotactic parasitoids, reproductive compensation, reproductive effort, Teleogryllus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. R. Kolluru, G. F. Grether, E. Dunlop, and S. H. South
Food availability and parasite infection influence mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. F. Nespolo, M. A. Lardies, and F. Bozinovic
Intrapopulational variation in the standard metabolic rate of insects: repeatability, thermal dependence and sensitivity (Q10) of oxygen consumption in a cricket
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4309 - 4315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.