Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 3: 326-333
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Female mate preferences and subsequent resistance to copulation in the mallard
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Address correspondence to E.J.A. Cunningham, who is now at Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. E-mail: ejac3{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk.
In the majority of socially monogamous bird species, females solicit or accept copulations from males other than their partner. Females may gain direct benefits from extrapair males, such as greater access to resources, or indirect genetic benefits that will influence the future success of their offspring. However, one group of birds appears to be the exception to this general rule; in the wildfowl (Anseriformes), all extrapair copulations appear to be resisted by females. It has been suggested that resistance behavior may be a strategy to allow females a greater choice of mates, either at the precopulatory level (to promote choice of copulation partner) and/or the postcopulatory level (to promote multiple mating to increase their choice of sperm). This paper examines the function of female resistance behavior in one of the dabbling ducks, the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Observations on a marked population of wild mallard and experiments with captive birds found that although females showed a strong preference for particular males that are the first to molt into their breeding plumage, male attractiveness did not influence female responses to pair or extrapair copulation attempts. Female resistance decreased the likelihood that copulation attempts would end in successful insemination. The findings did not support the hypothesis that females resist copulations to promote female choice and the reasons why waterfowl may benefit from avoiding all extrapair copulations are discussed.
Key words: Anas platyrhynchos, forced copulation, good genes, mallard, mate choice, resistance.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Adler Sexual conflict in waterfowl: why do females resist extrapair copulations? Behav. Ecol., November 24, 2009; (2009) arp160v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Chan, D. Stuart-Fox, and T. S. Jessop Why are females ornamented? A test of the courtship stimulation and courtship rejection hypotheses Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1334 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Hegyi, L. Z. Garamszegi, and M. Eens The roles of ecological factors and sexual selection in the evolution of white wing patches in ducks Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1208 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Denk, A. Holzmann, A. Peters, E. L.M. Vermeirssen, and B. Kempenaers Paternity in mallards: effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 825 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|