Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tay, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kaitala, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tay, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Kaitala, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 4: 481-485
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Do male golden egg bugs carry eggs they have fertilized? A microsatellite analysis

Wee Tek Taya,, Minna Miettinenb and Arja Kaitalaa

a Department of Biology, University of Oulu, Box 3000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland b Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

Address correspondence to W.T. Tay, who is now at the Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK. E-mail: weetek.tay{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.

In the golden egg bug, Phyllomorpha laciniata (Heteroptera, Coreidae), both males and females carry eggs on their back. Although females cannot carry their own eggs, males may carry eggs that they have fertilized. If males carry eggs they have fertilized, their behavior may be interpreted as paternal care. In this article, we provide genetic data for paternity assignment of eggs carried by 40 males collected from the field. The males and the eggs were typed by using four highly polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers. Out of the 247 eggs typed, 87% were excluded from the father-offspring relationship based on single-locus (least conservative exclusion) mismatches. Under the more conservative (exclusion by at least two single locus mismatches) method, 78% of the eggs were nonpaternal. Relatedness estimates further supported our paternity analyses. The average relatedness of the eggs to the carrying males was low (bem = -0.052 ± 0.024 SE). Within the population, males were unrelated to each other (bmm = -0.004 ± 0.0002 SE), as were the eggs carried by individual males (beggs = -0.004 ± 0.0001 SE). This first genetic study on the breeding system of the golden egg bugs did not find any support for the claim that egg carrying functioned as paternal care, nor did it support kin selection as explanation for conspecific egg carrying.

Key words: microsatellite, paternity, Phyllomorpha laciniata, relatedness.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
R. Hardling and A. Kaitala
Male brood care without paternity increases mating success
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 715 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.