Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 5: 668-678
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women
Departments of a Biology b Psychology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-1091, USA
Address correspondence to R. Thornhill. E-mail: rthorn{at}unm.edu.
Previous research indicates that the scent of developmental stability (low fluctuating asymmetry, FA) is attractive to women who are fertile (at high-conception risk points in their menstrual cycles), but not to other women or men. Prior research also indicates that the scent of dissimilarity in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes may play a role in human mate choice. We studied the scent attractiveness to the opposite sex of t-shirts worn for 2 nights' sleep. Our results indicate that the two olfactory systems are independent. We repeated previous results from studies of the scent of symmetry. We repeated previous results from MHC research in part; men, but not women, showed a preference for t-shirts with the scent of MHC dissimilarity. Women's scent ratings of t-shirts were uncorrelated with the wearer's MHC dissimilarity and allele frequency, but positively correlated with the wearer's MHC heterozygosity. Fertile women did not exhibit any MHC trait preferences. Women's preference for the scent of men who were heterozygous for MHC alleles may be stronger in women who are at infertile cycle points. Men preferred the scent of common MHC alleles, which may function to avoid mates with rare alleles that exhibit gestational drive. Men also preferred the scent of women at fertile cycle points. The scent of facially attractive women, but not men, was preferred. Neither FA nor facial attractiveness in either sex correlated with MHC dissimilarity to others, MHC heterozygosity, or MHC allelic rarity.
Key words: Homo sapiens, inbreeding, major histocompatibility complex, mate choice, parasites, pheromones, sexual selection.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. F. Luxen Sex Differences, Evolutionary Psychology and Biosocial Theory: Biosocial Theory is No Alternative Theory Psychology, June 1, 2007; 17(3): 383 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Havlicek and P. Lenochova The Effect of Meat Consumption on Body Odor Attractiveness Chem Senses, October 1, 2006; 31(8): 747 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. G. Haselton and D. Nettle The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2006; 10(1): 47 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|