Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornhill, R.
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thornhill, R.
Right arrow Articles by Franklin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 5: 668-678
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women

Randy Thornhilla,, Steven W. Gangestadb, Robert Millera, Glenn Scheydb, Julie K. McCollougha and Melissa Franklina

Departments of a Biology b Psychology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-1091, USA

Address correspondence to R. Thornhill. E-mail: rthorn{at}unm.edu.

Previous research indicates that the scent of developmental stability (low fluctuating asymmetry, FA) is attractive to women who are fertile (at high-conception risk points in their menstrual cycles), but not to other women or men. Prior research also indicates that the scent of dissimilarity in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes may play a role in human mate choice. We studied the scent attractiveness to the opposite sex of t-shirts worn for 2 nights' sleep. Our results indicate that the two olfactory systems are independent. We repeated previous results from studies of the scent of symmetry. We repeated previous results from MHC research in part; men, but not women, showed a preference for t-shirts with the scent of MHC dissimilarity. Women's scent ratings of t-shirts were uncorrelated with the wearer's MHC dissimilarity and allele frequency, but positively correlated with the wearer's MHC heterozygosity. Fertile women did not exhibit any MHC trait preferences. Women's preference for the scent of men who were heterozygous for MHC alleles may be stronger in women who are at infertile cycle points. Men preferred the scent of common MHC alleles, which may function to avoid mates with rare alleles that exhibit gestational drive. Men also preferred the scent of women at fertile cycle points. The scent of facially attractive women, but not men, was preferred. Neither FA nor facial attractiveness in either sex correlated with MHC dissimilarity to others, MHC heterozygosity, or MHC allelic rarity.

Key words: Homo sapiens, inbreeding, major histocompatibility complex, mate choice, parasites, pheromones, sexual selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. E. Hill and K. M. Durante
Do Women Feel Worse to Look Their Best? Testing the Relationship Between Self-Esteem and Fertility Status Across the Menstrual Cycle
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2009; 35(12): 1592 - 1601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Milinski, S. W. Griffiths, T. B. H. Reusch, and T. Boehm
Costly major histocompatibility complex signals produced only by reproductively active males, but not females, must be validated by a 'maleness signal' in three-spined sticklebacks
Proc R Soc B, October 21, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1501v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex AbuseHome page
J. A. Camilleri and V. L. Quinsey
Individual Differences in the Propensity for Partner Sexual Coercion
Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, March 1, 2009; 21(1): 111 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
S. C. Roberts, L. M. Gosling, V. Carter, and M. Petrie
MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives
Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2008; 275(1652): 2715 - 2722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. M. Durante, N. P. Li, and M. G. Haselton
Changes in Women's Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2008; 34(11): 1451 - 1460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
S. W Gangestad and R. Thornhill
Human oestrus
Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2008; 275(1638): 991 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
M. F. Luxen
Sex Differences, Evolutionary Psychology and Biosocial Theory: Biosocial Theory is No Alternative
Theory Psychology, June 1, 2007; 17(3): 383 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. Havlicek and P. Lenochova
The Effect of Meat Consumption on Body Odor Attractiveness
Chem Senses, October 1, 2006; 31(8): 747 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. G. Haselton and D. Nettle
The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2006; 10(1): 47 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
S. C. Roberts, A. C Little, L. M. Gosling, B. C Jones, D. I Perrett, V. Carter, and M. Petrie
MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans
Biol Lett, December 22, 2005; 1(4): 400 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
S. W Gangestad, R. Thornhill, and C. E Garver-Apgar
Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability
Proc R Soc B, October 7, 2005; 272(1576): 2023 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
J. Havlicek, S. C. Roberts, and J. Flegr
Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status
Biol Lett, September 22, 2005; 1(3): 256 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.