Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawes, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marthews, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lawes, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marthews, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 6: 757-770
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

When will rejection of parasite nestlings by hosts of nonevicting avian brood parasites be favored? A misimprinting-equilibrium model

Michael J. Lawesa and Toby R. Marthewsb

a School of Botany and Zoology b School of Mathematics, Statistics, and Information Technology, University of Natal (Pietermaritzburg), P/Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209 South Africa

Address correspondence to M.J. Lawes. E-mail: lawes{at}nu.ac.za.

It has been suggested that discrimination and rejection of the nestlings of avian brood parasites are most likely to evolve when the parasite nestling is raised alongside the host nestlings, for example, many cowbird-host systems. Under these circumstances, the benefits of discrimination are high because the host parents may save most of their brood. However, there is a general absence of nestling rejection behavior among hosts of nonevicting parasites. In a cost-benefit equilibrium model, based on the premise that host species learn to recognize their offspring through imprinting on first breeding, we show that nestling recognition can be adaptive for hosts of cowbirds, but only under strict conditions. Namely, when host nestling survival alongside the parasite is low, rates of parasitism are high and the average clutch size is large. All of these conditions are seldom simultaneously achieved in real systems. Most importantly, the parasite nestling, on average, does not sufficiently depress host nestling survival to outweigh the costs of nestling recognition and rejection errors. Thus, we argue that nestling acceptance behaviors by hosts of nonevicting brood parasites may be explained as an evolutionary equilibrium in which recognition costs act as a stabilizing selection pressure against rejection when most of the host's offspring survive parasitism.

Key words: brood parasitism, cost-benefit equilibrium, cowbirds, nestling rejection, nonevicting parasites, probability tree model.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
N. E. Langmore, A. Cockburn, A. F. Russell, and R. M. Kilner
Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 978 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. E. Hauber and C. Moskat
Shared parental care is costly for nestlings of common cuckoos and their great reed warbler hosts
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2008; 19(1): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. P. Hoover and S. K. Robinson
Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host acceptance of parasitic eggs
PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4479 - 4483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.