Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Amundsen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Amundsen, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 6: 793-801
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Food limitation in asynchronous bluethroat broods: effects on food distribution, nestling begging, and parental provisioning rules

Per T. Smiseth, Rolf J. Bu, Aase K. Eikenæs and Trond Amundsen

Department of Zoology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway

Address correspondence to P.T. Smiseth who is now at the School of Biological Sciences, 3.614 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: per.t.smiseth{at}man.ac.uk.

Scramble competition models of begging predict that junior nestlings will be more affected by food limitation than seniors. These models assume that food allocation is under offspring control and, hence, predict that this change in food distribution is caused by a differential behavioral response by seniors and juniors. By using the bluethroat (Luscinia svecica svecica) as our model species, we induced food limitation by removing the male parent temporarily. We found that, as predicted, food distribution became more biased in disfavor of juniors when food was limited. However, there was no significant difference in the behavioral responses of seniors and juniors (i.e., positioning in the nest or begging postures) to food limitation that could explain the change in food distribution. Hence, there was no evidence that seniors controlled food distribution. As predicted if parents preferentially fed seniors, nestling rank affected food distribution when controlling for variation in nestling behaviors. Furthermore, as expected if the increased skew in food distribution under food limitation was caused by active food allocation by parents, nestling rank had a greater effect on food distribution under food limitation than under normal conditions. The present study suggests that food distribution in passerine birds is determined not only by nestling behaviors (begging posture and positioning) alone but also by parental preferences for seniors based on nonsignaling cues, such as body size.

Key words: hatching asynchrony, Luscinia s. svecica, mate removal, sibling competition, signaling of need, size asymmetry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Jeon
Evolution of parental favoritism among different-aged offspring
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 344 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.