Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 6: 802-806
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates?
a Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, University of Uppsala, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden b Department of Biology, Syracuse University, 108 College Place, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA
Address correspondence to E.H. Morrow, who is now at the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. E-mail: morrow{at}lifesci.ucsb.edu.
Recent studies have documented male traits that cause physical harm to their mates during copulation. Such harm has been suggested to either (1) arise as a negative pleiotropic side effect of adaptations that give males a reproductive advantage in another context or (2) represent a male adaptation per se. In other words, male traits that cause harm to their mates may become established despite the fact that they cause harm or because they do so. A critical assumption of the latter hypotheses is that females respond to infliction of harm in a manner that is beneficial to their mates: by reducing their propensity to remate and/or by elevating their current reproductive rate. In the present study, we test this assumption by experimentally inflicting various forms of harm to females immediately after copulation in three different insect species. We reveal that females do not delay remating or increase their reproductive rate after being harmed but, on the contrary, remate sooner and lay fewer eggs in some cases. We conclude that selection for infliction of harm to females per se is unlikely. Instead, available empirical evidence supports the hypothesis that harmful male traits arise as negative pleiotropic side effects of adaptations that yield other selective advantages to males during reproductive competition.
Key words: accessory gland substances, Callosobruchus maculatus, Drosophila melanogaster, genitalia, sexual conflict, sperm competition, terminal investment, Tribolium castaneum.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Smolensky, M. R. Romero, and P. J. Krug Evidence for Costs of Mating and Self-Fertilization in a Simultaneous Hermaphrodite With Hypodermic Insemination, the Opisthobranch Alderia willowi Biol. Bull., April 1, 2009; 216(2): 188 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Plath, A. M. Makowicz, I. Schlupp, and M. Tobler Sexual harassment in live-bearing fishes (Poeciliidae): comparing courting and noncourting species Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 680 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ronn, M. Katvala, and G. Arnqvist Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles PNAS, June 26, 2007; 104(26): 10921 - 10925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. E Eady, L. Hamilton, and R. E Lyons Copulation, genital damage and early death in Callosobruchus maculatus Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2007; 274(1607): 247 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Arnqvist, T. M Jones, and M. A Elgar Sex-role reversed nuptial feeding reduces male kleptoparasitism of females in Zeus bugs (Heteroptera; Veliidae) Biol Lett, December 22, 2006; 2(4): 491 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. K. Michiels and J. M. Koene Sexual selection favors harmful mating in hermaphrodites more than in gonochorists Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 473 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Velando, H. Drummond, and R. Torres Senescent birds redouble reproductive effort when ill: confirmation of the terminal investment hypothesis Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2006; 273(1593): 1443 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Edvardsson and D. Canal The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 430 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nystrand Influence of age, kinship, and large-scale habitat quality on local foraging choices of Siberian jays Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 503 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T Tregenza, N Wedell, and T Chapman Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm? Phil Trans R Soc B, February 28, 2006; 361(1466): 229 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C Fiumera, B. L Dumont, and A. G Clark Natural variation in male-induced 'cost-of-mating' and allele-specific association with male reproductive genes in Drosophila melanogaster Phil Trans R Soc B, February 28, 2006; 361(1466): 355 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A Maklakov, N. Kremer, and G. Arnqvist Adaptive male effects on female ageing in seed beetles Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2005; 272(1580): 2485 - 2489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Edvardsson and T. Tregenza Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 788 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. Rice, J. E. Linder, U. Friberg, T. A. Lew, E. H. Morrow, and A. D. Stewart Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: Assessment with hemiclonal analysis PNAS, May 3, 2005; 102(suppl_1): 6527 - 6534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|