Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zbinden, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bakker, T. C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zbinden, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bakker, T. C. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 1: 137-140
© 2004 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Body size of virtual rivals affects ejaculate size in sticklebacks

Marc Zbindena,b, Carlo R. Largiadèrb and Theo C. M. Bakkera

a Institut für Evolutionsbiologie und Ökologie, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, D-53121 Bonn, Germany b CMPG, Abt. Populationsgenetik, Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

Address correspondence to M. Zbinden, who is now at Unit for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland. E-mail: marc.zbinden{at}unifr.ch.

Sperm competition occurs when sperm of two or more males compete to fertilize a given set of eggs. Theories on sperm competition expect males under high risk of sperm competition to increase ejaculate size. Here we confirm this prediction experimentally in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). In this species, sneaking (i.e., stealing of fertilizations by neighboring males) can lead to sperm competition. Sneaking males invade foreign nests, and the owners vigorously try to prevent this intrusion. In such fights, male body size is assumed to be an important predictor of success. Consequently, the risk of sperm competition may depend on the size of a potential competitor. We experimentally confronted males before spawning with either a large or a small computer-animated rival. We show that males ejaculated significantly more sperm after the presentation of the larger virtual rival than after the small stimulus. In addition, the time between the initiation of courting and the spawning was shorter in the large virtual male treatment. The results suggest that stickleback males tailor ejaculate size relative to the risk of sperm competition perceived by the size of a potential competitor.

Key words: body size, computer animation, ejaculate size, Gasterosteus aculeatus, sperm competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
L. Engqvist and K. Reinhold
Sperm competition games: optimal sperm allocation in response to the size of competing ejaculates
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2007; 274(1607): 209 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biol LettHome page
S. J Kilgallon and L. W Simmons
Image content influences men's semen quality
Biol Lett, September 22, 2005; 1(3): 253 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.