Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, D. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 1: 181-186
© 2004 International Society for Behavioral Ecology


Forum

Ideal flea constraints on group living: unwanted public goods and the emergence of cooperation

Dominic D. P. Johnsona, Pavel Stopkab and David W. Macdonalda

a Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK b Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Zoology, Charles University, Vinicná 7, Prague 2, Czech Republic

Address correspondence to D. D. P. Johnson. E-mail: dominic@post.harvard.edu.

Received 24 September 2001; revised 11 February 2003; accepted 14 March 2003.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Long ago, Hamilton (1971) proposed that the "selfish herd" effect, while primarily thought to reduce predation risk, might also apply to avoiding parasites. Solitary individuals suffer higher ectoparasite burdens if they lack conspecifics either to absorb collateral damage from the local ectoparasite population or to remove ectoparasites by allogrooming. By grouping, therefore, animals may reduce their individual risk of exposure to parasites (Mooring and Hart, 1992Go). This is important because there are significant fitness costs associated with ectoparasite loads. More ectoparasites take more blood, cause more irritation, increase the probability of infection, and decrease the time available for other activities, because grooming becomes a higher priority. These costs vary with group size because a greater number of hosts and shared den sites means ectoparasites are more likely to survive stochastic variation. The dynamics of parasite control might therefore present crucial constraints on group size and a novel origin for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A simulation model
Model description
Model results
An empirical test
Methods

    RESULTS
 
Prediction 1 (group sizes should correlate with ectoparasite load)
Prediction 2 (variance should be greater between social groups than within them)

    DISCUSSION
 
Conclusions

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
C. M Gomes, R. Mundry, and C. Boesch
Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African chimpanzees
Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2009; 276(1657): 699 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Hillegass, J. M. Waterman, and J. D. Roth
The influence of sex and sociality on parasite loads in an African ground squirrel
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1006 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]