Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Monaghan, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Monaghan, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 2: 205-209
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 2 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Sex differences in embryo development periods and effects on avian hatching patterns

Mark I. Cook and Pat Monaghan

Ornithology Group, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

Address correspondence to P. Monaghan. E-mail: p.monaghan{at}bio.gla.ac.uk. M. I. Cook is now at the Everglades Division, South Florida Water Management District, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33406, USA.

Competitive interactions among siblings are an important determinant of parental fitness. These are strongly influenced by relative offspring size and therefore also by the extent to which parents can influence offspring size hierarchies. The temporal pattern of hatching in an avian clutch has a large effect on size and developmental disparities among chicks. Hatching spread is generally assumed to be mainly determined by the onset of incubation in relation to egg laying. However, the extent to which factors other than incubation onset, such as development rate, also influence timing of hatching has received little empirical investigation. We compared incubation periods of male and female black guillemot (Cepphus grylle) embryos to ascertain whether the time taken for an egg to hatch varies with embryo sex. Laying date and egg mass had no significant effect on incubation time, but male embryos hatched on average a day sooner than did females. The onset of incubation and hatching spread vary in black guillemots. However, in mixed-sexed clutches in which the first-laid embryo is male, a faster development time of males should mean asynchronous hatching regardless of parental incubation regime. This was supported by empirical investigation. These results demonstrate that factors other than incubation behavior can be important in establishing avian hatching patterns. Whether these sex differences in development rate are a result of constraints on the degree of parental control, or an adaptive strategy to manipulate hatching patterns, remains to be established.

Key words: black guillemot, embryo sex, hatching asynchrony, incubation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. A. Fargallo, V. Polo, L. de Neve, J. Martin, J. A. Davila, and M. Soler
Hatching order and size-dependent mortality in relation to brood sex ratio composition in chinstrap penguins
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 772 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
K. M Pilz, E. Adkins-Regan, and H. Schwabl
No sex difference in yolk steroid concentrations of avian eggs at laying
Biol Lett, September 22, 2005; 1(3): 318 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.