Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, P. T.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 15 No. 4: 621-628
Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 4 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Behavioral dynamics between caring males and females in a beetle with facultative biparental care

Per T. Smiseth and Allen J. Moore

School of Biological Sciences, 3.614 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

Address correspondence to P. T. Smiseth. E-mail: per.t.smiseth{at}man.ac.uk

In families in which both parents care for multiple offspring, the amount of care a parent provides can be simultaneously influenced by multiple social interactions (i.e., parent-parent and parent-offspring). In this study, we first tested for sex differences in the parents' contribution to care and then used path analysis to address the simultaneous impact of parent-parent and parent-offspring interactions on male and female care in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. In this species, both parents provision their offspring predigested carrion from a vertebrate carcass, and the larvae beg for food from their parents. We found that females were more involved in direct care for the larvae and spent more time than did males provisioning the larvae with food. By using path analysis, we found a negative relationship between male and female provisioning, suggesting that parents adjust their behavior to that of their mate. Furthermore, we found that both social interactions (i.e., larval begging) and nonsocial factors (i.e., brood size) significantly influenced male provisioning, but had no significant effect on female provisioning. We suggest that the difference in the relative contribution of the two sexes to the care of the offspring explains why only males seemed to adjust their care to variation in social and nonsocial factors. For example, females may be less able to adjust their care to variation in larval begging and brood size because they were already working near their maximum capacity.

Key words: begging, biparental care, burying beetles, parent-offspring conflict, sexual conflict.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. B.V. Bell
Receiver identity modifies begging intensity independent of need in banded mongoose (mungos mungo) pups
Behav. Ecol., August 27, 2008; (2008) arn104v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. T. Smiseth and H. J. Parker
Is there a cost to larval begging in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides?
Behav. Ecol., August 25, 2008; (2008) arn101v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. A. Johnstone and C. A. Hinde
Negotiation over offspring care--how should parents respond to each other's efforts?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 818 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.