Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2004 15(5):729-734; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh070
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/5/729    most recent
arh070v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leaver, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 5 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Effects of food value, predation risk, and pilferage on the caching decisions of Dipodomys merriami

Lisa A. Leaver

School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK

Address correspondence to L. A. Leaver. E-mail: l.a.leaver{at}exeter.ac.uk.

Animals that scatter cache their food face a trade-off between the benefits of protecting caches from pilferers and the costs associated with caching. Placing food into a large number of widely spaced caches helps to protect it from pilferage but also involves costs such as greater exposure to predators. I predicted that animals would disperse food into a larger number of more widely spaced caches when caching (1) a preferred food versus a less preferred food and (2) under conditions of low predation risk versus high predation risk. To test these predictions, I examined the scatter-caching decisions of Merriam's kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami). D. merriami distributed caches in clumped patterns, regardless of food preference, but they showed a tendency to invest more in a preferred food by distributing caches more widely. Under the relative safety of the new moon, they did not disperse caches more widely, rather they partitioned the same amount of food into a larger number of caches than they did under the full moon, when predation risk is higher. To examine whether their cache spacing decisions had a significant impact on the success of cache pilferers, I measured discovery by pilferers of artificial caches of two food types at different caching distances. Results indicate that the cache spacing behavior of D. merriami functions to protect caches from pilferers, because increased spacing of artificial caches decreased the probability of pilferage for both types of food.

Key words: caching, Dipodomys merriami, food preference, kangaroo rats, pilferage, predation risk.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
L. J. Hopewell, L. A. Leaver, and S. E.G. Lea
Effects of competition and food availability on travel time in scatter-hoarding gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis)
Behav. Ecol., July 30, 2008; (2008) arn095v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.