Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2004 15(5):810-815; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh084
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/5/810    most recent
arh084v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Adrian, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Adrian, J. C., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 5 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Assessment of local predation risk: the role of subthreshold concentrations of chemical alarm cues

Grant E. Browna, Jean-Francois Poiriera and James C. Adrian, Jrb

a Department of Biology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St., W. Montréal, Quebéc, H4B 1R6, Canada b Department of Chemistry, Union College, Science and Engineering Center, Schenectady, NY, 12308, USA

Address correspondence to G. E. Brown. E-mail: gbrown{at}alcor.concordia.ca.

The ability to accurately assess local predation risk is critical to prey individuals, as it allows them to maximize threat-sensitive trade-offs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities. A wide range of taxonomically diverse prey (including many freshwater fishes) relies on chemical alarm cues (alarm pheromones) as their primary information source for local risk assessment. However, the value of chemical alarm cues has been questioned due to the availability of additional sensory inputs (i.e., visual cues) and the lack of an overt antipredator response under conditions of low perceived risk. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that chemical alarm cues at concentrations below the point at which they elicit an overt behavioral response function to increase vigilance towards other sensory modalities (i.e., visual alarm cues). Shoals of glowlight tetras (Hemigrammus erythrozonus) exposed to the subthreshold concentration of hypoxanthine-3-N-oxide (the putative Ostariophysan alarm pheromone) did not exhibit an overt antipredator response in the absence of secondary visual cues (not different than the distilled water control). However, when exposed to the sight of a visually alarmed conspecific, they significantly increased the intensity of their antipredator response (not different from shoals exposed to the suprathreshold alarm cue). This study demonstrates that prey may benefit from responding to low concentration alarm cues by increasing vigilance towards secondary cues during local risk assessment, even in the absence of an overt behavioral response. By increasing vigilance towards secondary risk assessment cues in the presence of a low risk chemical cue, individuals are likely able to maximize the threat-sensitive trade-offs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities.

Key words: Chemical alarm cues, Ostariophysan fishes, predator-prey interactions, antipredator behavior, vigilance, risk assessment, threat-sensitive trade-offs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
D. Chen, A. Katdare, and N. Lucas
Chemosignals of Fear Enhance Cognitive Performance in Humans
Chem Senses, June 1, 2006; 31(5): 415 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.