Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 11, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2004 15(5):850-856; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh094
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/5/850    most recent
arh094v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schino, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schino, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 5 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Birth sex ratio and social rank: consistency and variability within and between primate groups

Gabriele Schino

Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy

Address correspondence to G. Schino. E-mail: gschino{at}casaccia.enea.it.

Variations in birth sex ratios in primates are notoriously inconsistent and have been repeatedly suggested to be mainly owing to stochastic processes. An examination of temporal consistency within primate populations revealed that the effect of dominance rank on birth sex ratio tends to remains stable over time. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of published data on sex ratio variations in primates shows that although no overall effect was detectable, the relation between birth sex ratio and dominance rank was affected by level of resource availability and degree of sexual dimorphism. These results suggest that purely stochastic processes are unlikely to explain observed variations in primate birth sex ratios, and may explain why adaptive sex ratio variations in primates have been so difficult to demonstrate.

Key words: maternal investment, meta-analysis, population growth, sexual dimorphism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Meunier, S. A. West, and M. Chapuisat
Split sex ratios in the social Hymenoptera: a meta-analysis
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 382 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
J. B Silk, E. Willoughby, and G. R Brown
Maternal rank and local resource competition do not predict birth sex ratios in wild baboons
Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2005; 272(1565): 859 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.