Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 7, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2004 15(6):1031-1036; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh074
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/6/1031    most recent
arh074v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Neve, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Contreras, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by De Neve, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Contreras, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 15 no. 6 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2004; all rights reserved

Nest size predicts the effect of food supplementation to magpie nestlings on their immunocompetence: an experimental test of nest size indicating parental ability

Liesbeth De Nevea, Juan José Solerb, Manuel Solera and Tomás Pérez-Contrerasb

a Departamento de Biología Animal y Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain, and b Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, c/ General Segura 1, 04001 Almería, Spain

Address correspondence to L. De Neve, who is now at the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales – Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Departamento Ecología Evolutiva, c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: deneve{at}mncn.csic.es.

Post-mating sexually selected signals are expected to indicate parental quality. The good parent model assumes that expression of the sexual character positively reflects parental ability, resulting in a potential link between the exaggeration of the character and nestling-fitness traits. We tested this prediction in a population of a monogamous passerine, the magpie (Pica pica), for which nest size is known to act as a post-mating sexually selected signal. We provided a food supplement to half of the magpie nestlings in each nest, keeping the other half as control nestlings. We found that food-supplemented nestlings experienced a significantly higher T-cell-mediated immune response and a tendency to an increased condition index. In accordance with the good parent model, we found that nest size was positively related to T-cell mediated immune response for control magpie, whereas this relationship was nonexistent in food-supplemented nestlings. In addition, the difference in T-cell mediated immune response between food-supplemented and control nestlings of the same nest was principally explained by nest size. Based on our results, we discuss that magpie pairs with large nests provided their nestlings with higher quality food as compared to pairs with smaller nests, nest size thereby being an indicator of parental ability. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing a link between a post-mating sexually selected signal and nestling immunocompetence, a trait closely related to fitness in birds.

Key words: immune response, magpie, parental care, sexual selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. J. Soler, M. Martin-Vivaldi, C. Haussy, and A. P. Moller
Intra- and interspecific relationships between nest size and immunity
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 781 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.