Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 21, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):196-200; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh143
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/196    most recent
arh143v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Savage, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

Male attractiveness covaries with fighting ability but not with prior fight outcome in house crickets

Kate E. Savagea, John Hunta, Michael D. Jennionsb and Robert Brooksa

a School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, and b School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

Address correspondence to J. Hunt. E-mail: john.hunt{at}unsw.edu.au.

In many species males that tend to win fights against other males are more attractive to females. There are three ways in which male fighting ability and attractiveness may be associated: (1) attractiveness and fighting ability are influenced by the same underlying traits (e.g., body size), (2) females prefer males that have directly observed winning fights, or (3) winning previous fights indirectly improves a male's chance of being preferred by females. The last possibility may arise as a consequence of the "loser effect"; in many species when a male loses a fight his probability of losing subsequent fights increases. There are, however, no studies testing whether such a "loser effect" also influences male attractiveness. Here we show that male attractiveness and fighting ability are positively correlated in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. Our experiment was designed so that females could not directly observe the outcome of fights, thus eliminating possibility (2) above. We then tested between possibilities (1) and (3) by making use of the fact that in some cricket species the "loser effect" can be eliminated experimentally by ‘shaking’ a male and stimulating the motor program for flying. We showed that in A. domesticus ‘shaking’ does affect the outcome of subsequent fights. Males that had won two previous fights were less likely to win a fight after being ‘shaken’ than when subject to a control treatment. In contrast, males that had lost two previous fights were more likely to win a fight after being ‘shaken’ than when they were not shaken. There was, however, no effect of ‘shaking’ on male attractiveness. We conclude that the "loser effect" does not alter the tendency for large, dominant males to be attractive to females. Instead, it appears that there are traits correlated with both fighting ability and attractiveness. One such trait is body size. Fight winners were significantly larger than losers and attractiveness was positively correlated with male body size.

Key words: Acheta domesticus, attractiveness, body size, fighting ability, "loser-effect".


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. L. Thomas and L. W. Simmons
Male dominance influences pheromone expression, ejaculate quality, and fertilization success in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1118 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.