Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on September 22, 2004
Behavioral Ecology 2005 16(1):294-300; doi:10.1093/beheco/arh161
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/294    most recent
arh161v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolluru, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Grether, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kolluru, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Grether, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology vol. 16 no. 1 © International Society for Behavioral Ecology 2005; all rights reserved.

The effects of resource availability on alternative mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

Gita R. Kolluru and Gregory F. Grether

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA

Address correspondence to G. R. Kolluru. E-mail: gkolluru{at}obee.ucla.edu.

Food availability can influence the optimal allocation of time and energy among alternative behaviors such as foraging, courting, and competing for mates. If populations differ consistently in food availability, selection may cause geographic divergence in allocation strategies. At the opposite extreme, a norm of reaction may evolve such that food intake influences the allocation strategy of individuals in the same way in all populations. Between these two extremes, food intake reaction norms may diverge genetically among populations. For example, at sites where food is scarce, selection may strengthen the effect of food intake on behavior, whereas at sites with abundant food, selection may be weak or even oppose plasticity. We tested these ideas by raising male guppies from streams differing in food availability in a common laboratory environment on either low or high food levels, and then observing them in the presence of male competitors (from the same population and diet group) and receptive females. Males from low-food-availability streams spent more time foraging than males from high-food-availability streams, independent of food intake. Compared with males raised on the high food level, males raised on the low food level spent more time foraging and were less aggressive towards other males. Courtship display rate increased with food intake but only in males from low-food streams. In contrast, males from high-food streams showed greater plasticity with respect to male-male aggression. These results generally support the resource availability/behavioral tradeoff hypothesis while also revealing a surprising degree of ontogenetic complexity in a relatively simple system.

Key words: aggression, alternative reproductive tactic, food availability, food intake, guppy, intrasexual competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. R. Kolluru, G. F. Grether, E. Dunlop, and S. H. South
Food availability and parasite infection influence mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
B. Larison
Environmental heterogeneity and alternative mating tactics in the damselfly Protoneura amatoria
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2007; 18(6): 1021 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.